Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: georgevedwards
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 108 next>>
May 27, 2015 12:32:50   #
Wix! Its free, it looks great! Check out my Wix site: http://geoedwards.wix.com/photos
buddah17 wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can have a Website created for my photo and art images that is both affordable and functional?
(IE: Having leads in many places on the Internet, easy to add or change images/information, creative, etc..)
I am a college student with no income at the moment, so my funds to have the site created, (and more importantly, to maintain,) are limited.
Thanks..
Go to
May 27, 2015 12:29:50   #
Ken Rockwell! When I am researching a piece of equipment I don't want to have to spend a lot of time watching a whole video to get to the specification I am interested in. At least with Rockwell you can skim around. DPreview is best for an objective opinion, but sometimes it is hard to know if that is good or bad. Surely there must be some more choices! Crockett's link led me to a photo gallery but not a review of equipment.
Jaackil wrote:
Who Wins?
Go to
May 27, 2015 12:20:05   #
:thumbup:
Go to
May 24, 2015 12:55:10   #
You gambled on Ebay and won the lottery. One may not be so lucky the next time. Take the money and run. Or use the repair money and gamble on Ebay again. It is up to you.
Lou37 wrote:
Hi Mikeazz , The EBay $112 D70s is not the problem camera. That works fine and takes great photos. The D70s that I drove to Nikon is another camera. I liked the one I purchased on EBay so much that I was interested in having the camera fixed so I would have two that worked.
Go to
May 24, 2015 12:30:22   #
Let me get this straight, you had two Nikon D70s cameras. One was broken and you wanted it repaired by the manufacturer. At least one other one you had works fine. but it cost less to buy on Ebay used than the repair cost of the other camera. I agree it would be better to go back to Ebay and buy another used one for less than the repair price. One problem: Ebay and used equipment is a crap shoot. I purchased a used printer once and it did not work. Getting my money back ($150) required intervention from Ebay and I was just lucky I did not lose my money all together. That is the real difference, you can't compare gambling to Nikon. There are many things I do not like about Nikon, but I used to own Canon and only since I switched to Nikon equipment have I been satisfied with the quality of the photos I now get. My main problem is not having the money to afford what I want from them, like an FX instead of a DX, and a nice Macro/Micro lens
Lou37 wrote:
I do understand what free estimate means, however I did not get one. While I was at the counter with my D70s the woman told me that it would cost over $200 to repair the camera. I asked her to detemine what was wrong with the camera and I would decide if I would get it repaired. What they did was hold onto the camera for 5 days and sent me a letter that it would cost over $200, which i s apparently their flat rate to repair the camera. With respect to the other D70s that I purchased on E-Bay, I purchased it before I ever drove to Nikon which is 8 minutes from my house. I own many Nikons from Nikormat, F5,D100, D1x, and on and on. Most of my equipment was purchased new. I worked in Manhattan for 34 years, so I am well aware what things cost, having dealt personally with B&H, Adorama, 47th St. camera, and Ken Hansen. I basically got the impression that Nikon has a set price to repair different camera models and that is in my opinion wrong. With respect to the value of the D70s, it is a lot less than the flat rate to repair. My belief is that they cater to Professionals and not amateur photographers which in my opinion accounts for the rather high prices
I do understand what free estimate means, however ... (show quote)
Go to
May 18, 2015 03:12:35   #
I got a factory refurbished Nikon 70-300mm zoom for under $500, it is probably the best deal for that range, otherwise you are getting into the $1000+ range; there seems to be a similar Nikon telephoto but it is very long physically as are a lot of super telephotos. Tha 70-300 is very sharp all the way to 300. I think it is a substantial difference, maybe not to the bird shooters at a 100 yards but good enough for human sports. Anything more will introduce problems with hand holding instead of a tripod. The 70-300 has VR and I got some very sharp shots at 300mm.
duhi wrote:
Have to get a lens with more reach than the 200. Photographing grandsons baseball games and decided on a 300 zoom, but would like opinions on choices. 1. New Tamron 70-300 or 2. Factory refurbished Nikon 55-300.

Thanks for input .
Go to
May 18, 2015 02:01:17   #
I got a factory refurbished Nikon 70-300mm zoom for under $500, it is probably the best deal for that range, otherwise you are getting into the $1000+ range; there seems to be a similar Nikon telephoto but it is very long physically as are a lot of super telephotos. Tha 70-300 is very sharp all the way to 300. I think it is a substantial difference, maybe not to the bird shooters at a 100 yards but good enough for human sports. Anything more will introduce problems with hand holding instead of a tripod. The 70-300 has VR and I got some very sharp shots at 300mm.
duhi wrote:
Have to get a lens with more reach than the 200. Photographing grandsons baseball games and decided on a 300 zoom, but would like opinions on choices. 1. New Tamron 70-300 or 2. Factory refurbished Nikon 55-300.

Thanks for input .
Go to
May 18, 2015 01:52:55   #
By cat photo, is that an oblique reference to a 'double meaning'? For example, did you see the Danica Patrick commercial where the papparazi are photographing beautiful women arriving at a posh event in limousines...each gets out holding a pet beaver. When Danica gets out, without a pet, the photographers chorus: "Show us your beaver!" I thought that was hilarious! Supposedly banned from the Superbowl.
n3eg wrote:
I think he did the right thing. But the wife of an A-lister arguing about $200 to pay for photo shoots? She was just begging for trouble.

This is why all my photos are rated G...well, except for that one cat photo...
Go to
May 12, 2015 23:16:07   #
Could you give us a list of the commonly known names for different kinds of "SSD" devices and those that are "Non SSD"? I was brought up to believe solid state meant anything that does not use vacuum tubes. Evidently there is a "mechanical disc hard drive" like what comes in a computer that does not have vacuum tubes but is not considered an SSD device, which from what I understand refers to those little things that plug into a USB, like a "flash drive"? (I know a girl photographer who kept all her photos on a flash drive in her pocketbook. One day she lost it and was out of business. She wasn't the technical type) I couldn't keep track of a 1 inch thingie with my photographic life recorded on it either, but I wouldn' try! I would lose anything like that too before it had a chance to degrade!
blackest wrote:
According to an article in ibtimes.co.uk

"The standards body for the microelectronics industry has found that Solid State Drives (SSD) can start to lose their data and become corrupted if they are left without power for as little as a week.

Today, consumers use several types of devices to store information – from computer hard drives, to external hard drives, to flash drives (also known as USB memory sticks or thumb drives) and SSDs.

While hard drives are mechanical in nature and make sure of rapidly rotating discs coated with magnetic material, flash storage devices are completely electronic, making use of a chip to process the data, so that data can be transferred much faster into smaller devices that are also more durable if dropped.

According to a recent presentation by Seagate's Alvin Cox, who is also chairman of the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), the period of time that data will be retained on an SSD is halved for every 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) rise in temperature in the area where the SSD is stored.

Consumer class SSDs can store data for up to two years before the standard drops, but when it comes to SSDs used by enterprises, the drives are only expected to retain data for a period of three months – a fact confirmed by Samsung, Seagate and Intel's own ratings on their products.

Security firm KoreLogic is concerned that far too many people are now using SSDs in both consumer and enterprise applications, which is clearly not a great idea if the data is important and might be needed for a longer period that three months.

The firm advises that users make sure to regularly back up their data and create drive images, or they will risk losing their data, which can have disastrous consequences, for example if the data was part of evidence gather by a law firm for a deposition.

"If long term storage is required, image the SSD onto a mechanical drive and place that drive in storage as well as the SSD," KoreLogic writes in a blog post.

"If you maintain an online legal hold storage capability, image the SSD to that storage. Either way, you essentially eliminate potential data retention problems. The worst-case scenario is explaining to the court why your data cannot be accessed because the hard drive you placed into storage is throwing out errors."

This is the first i've heard of this issue but worth considering when thinking about long term storage of image files. Which is why I posted this article. I think as photographers we tend to have large numbers of unique files that are irreplaceable.
According to an article in ibtimes.co.uk br br &q... (show quote)
Go to
May 12, 2015 23:01:18   #
I am thinking with the movable screen, you should have found a shady angle, although it is a little awkward to center an image when the articulated screen is at an abnormal position. I have a D5200 and am thinking that any other camera would have the same problem, without the articulated screen. I do not see how the articulated screen would introduce a sunlight problem, if it did just put it back into its original position like any other camera. I have noticed the bright sunlight problem in viewing any screen on any of my cameras or devices. I may be missing something here, did Nikon change the viewscreen properties in the 5200 to make it different for video than other cameras? I will admit I have never taken a video with any DSLR camera (or any other camera for that matter). Maybe your problem is comparing DSLR video to a specifically designed for video camera, a completely different animal, I see they seem to have elevated eyepieces or something, a completely different arrangement from a DSLR camera.
Barronofbostic wrote:
Hi,
I use a Nikon D5200 camera.
I went to see the Victory in Europe (VE Day) in Washington DC on May 8th to photograph the historic flyover by all of the U.S. planes that took part in the war. The show was terrific and I got many still photos of good quality. I was not able to take video, however, because I couldn't use TTL sighting. It was impossible, in the sun's glare, to find the airplanes and follow them on the movable video screen. I was so disappointed to have missed the video of a once in a lifetime flyover. It looks as though video on the Nikon 5200 is meant for inside or just around your house, providing it is not too sunny to see the screen. Do I need a dedicated video camera in addition to my Nikon 5200, and if so, which ones are recommended? Have any other digital camera makers solved this video problem? Thank you for your help.
Hi, br I use a Nikon D5200 camera. br I went to se... (show quote)
Go to
May 11, 2015 11:10:39   #
I guess I would ask for a list of which devices by their popular names that are in common usage are considered SSD. For instance, I am still not sure if a camera memory card is considered an SSD device. So CD's and DVD's are are not, even thought they use solid state devices to be read? My external Western Digital 3 terrabyte memory device looks like a solid state piece of equipment, but is or is not?
revhen wrote:
SSD is Solid State Drive. It stores info by changing the configuration of the electrons/molecules within. Don't ask me how! I guess there is a possibility of slowly losing that configuration by reverting to the original state. On the other hand HD (Hard Drives) change the magnetic orientation of little bits of iron on glass platters. They can change their orientation only if an external magnetic force is applied.

I am, however, always suspicious When the makers of one type of technology attacks another type. It's the money, stupid!
SSD is Solid State Drive. It stores info by chang... (show quote)
Go to
May 11, 2015 06:06:00   #
Can you translate that into English? I have been using computers daily for 20 years and have no idea what an SSD is. Is my Western Digital external hard drive an SSD? Is my DVD an SSD? Solid State Device? That covers like all modern electronics... My camera memory card is that an SSD?
Go to
May 5, 2015 23:21:29   #
Did you see the car crash compilation video that followed?
bcheary wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRpPPobJEe4
Go to
May 5, 2015 23:06:39   #
Wish I knew what you are talking about. I am not sure if I have the same problem or not, let alone fix it. Can you give a "for dummies" version? for one thing many terms are unfamiliar and the ones I know I don't see the connection. I have been doing DSLR for 15yrs and you make me feel like a newbie.
JerryEK wrote:
Thanks for the reply.

I probably wasn't clear. I can find and extract the exif data from a single image. I can extract this information for all of the files in a given directory, but to a DOS txt file. After some manipulation (programming a Delphi app) I can then generate a grid listing all of the info on all of the files. Finally I can export this to an Excel file.

What I am looking for is a program that will do this all in one step: Chose a set of files or a directory and have the program generate directly the Excel file.

Thanks again.
Thanks for the reply. br br I probably wasn't c... (show quote)
Go to
May 5, 2015 23:02:21   #
Can't get any better than that, my friend! I downloaded so I could see the data, you even have a similar camera to my Nikon D5200. I thought it must be a full frame. This changes my mind about Tamron, I see they have made vast improvements. My old 28-300 was very soft at 300, but that 600mm is 'tack sharp' as they say!
larryzplace wrote:
Took a walk by a local lake.. Tamron 150-600
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 108 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.