Quite frankly, you can use a single setting that will work for everything.

raw (to the maximal capabilities of your camera, 14?) + F JPG. Do remember that you can make better JPGs from a raw than the camera does, so the JPG option? Use it only if there is a need to share immediately, otherwise, it is not needed.

'Medium raw?' what the heck is that? Another hybrid to save space? There is no advantage there. Same as saving raw 12, which makes no sense at all.

I am always puzzled when someone comes out with their setting, and it turns out that they basically castrate their camera capabilities under the illusion it is 'better'.

'M' with auto ISO is a semi auto, sure there are advantages there. It is only good choice if you constrain the ISO in order to get the best results. Test your camera to check what starting ISO is best (Usually the base ISO + 2~3 for invariant sensors) the high ISO depends on your tolerance for noise.

I would query your use of wide AF for landscape. It comes with the risk that the camera will use a focus point in your immediate foreground when what you really wanted was a focus point that was a specific distance away from you (and not necessarily close). Using centre weighted (or whatever your camera calls it) gives you some control over the focus point. Even if the intended subject isn't close to the centre you have the opportunity to get a focus lock and then recompose.

Somebody will no doubt point out that the plane of focus is (approximately) flat and if you swivel the camera the plane of focus swivels with it. However, in landscape photography the chances are you'll be using an aperture that's small enough to give a fair amount of DOF, so exact positioning of the plane of focus isn't essential. I would expect that to be the case most of the time in landscape photography.