Posts for: polonois
Dec 9, 2022 20:38:49 #
These were taken just over a week ago by my youngest daughter snorkeling from the beach with an Olympus TG5.
Dec 5, 2022 08:53:13 #
Nov 22, 2022 10:46:37 #
sippyjug104 wrote:
Jerry, Ivan Pavlov was performing experiments using dogs as the subjects. He observed, "What gets rewarded, gets repeated."
When bad behavior gets rewarded, it gets repeated. This is also why being soft on crime only encourages more crime.
When bad behavior gets rewarded, it gets repeated. This is also why being soft on crime only encourages more crime.
Right on!
Sep 29, 2022 09:47:38 #
Sep 23, 2022 08:40:48 #
Kodachrome 64,Kodak Ektar 25
Sep 13, 2022 12:05:10 #
Longshadow wrote:
Some will like it as it will allow them to create images from their mind.
I'll stick with photography.
I'll stick with photography.
I agree
Sep 13, 2022 12:04:40 #
chemsaf wrote:
Given there are still many paint and print artists not supplanted by photography I doubt that AI will do away with photography.
Where are you in Lancaster County. I am F&M '65.
Where are you in Lancaster County. I am F&M '65.
About 10 miles west. Along the river.
I took a few classes at F&M over 50 years ago.
Sep 13, 2022 11:07:29 #
An Interesting article from MIT. After scrolling through the pictures could this be the Future of Photography?
Will Cameras become a thing of the past?
AI system makes models like DALL-E 2 more creative
https://news.mit.edu/2022/ai-system-makes-models-like-dall-e-2-more-creative-0908
Will Cameras become a thing of the past?
AI system makes models like DALL-E 2 more creative
https://news.mit.edu/2022/ai-system-makes-models-like-dall-e-2-more-creative-0908
Aug 26, 2022 10:54:26 #
AzPicLady wrote:
Maybe if prisons still were like this, fewer people would want to go there! Our prisons are more like condos.
Right on, I agree
Aug 18, 2022 09:08:19 #
I hope that's a .22 rimfire or there is a trip to the emergency on the way.
Aug 12, 2022 18:47:35 #
Canisdirus wrote:
I'm not interested in any consensus.
Just letting folks know what is really going on here.
It's already set up by the politicians globally...there is no stopping it at this point.
The money shift and drain I mean...it's done...how bad it becomes is unknown.
The important part is...in the end...nothing will be enough to change anything...except power and bank accounts.
Hey...if a person says...okay by me.
Just know what the reality is.
Just letting folks know what is really going on here.
It's already set up by the politicians globally...there is no stopping it at this point.
The money shift and drain I mean...it's done...how bad it becomes is unknown.
The important part is...in the end...nothing will be enough to change anything...except power and bank accounts.
Hey...if a person says...okay by me.
Just know what the reality is.
No matter how true it is, the reality is no one really cares.
In the end we will all pay the price.
Thank you for trying.
Aug 12, 2022 15:15:43 #
Canisdirus wrote:
\ br br br br Propagated... by who? br br It's... (show quote)
I hate to say this however you're preaching to the quire. No one will listen to the voice of reason. All you will get is arguments.
Aug 11, 2022 22:54:49 #
Aug 11, 2022 15:01:10 #
gvarner wrote:
Your commentary sounds exactly like the rational made by the New Earth Creationists when they argue that the earth is only 6000 years old, 10,000 tops. You pseudoscience argument conveniently leaves out the use of ancient glacial ice core samples and modern statistical methods that tie this current warming cycle to anthropomorphic causes.
Sorry the earth is approx. 4.5 billion years old. No I don't rule out anything . Junk science is Junk science.
Aug 11, 2022 14:46:21 #
TriX wrote:
Not NOAA or NCAR or NCDC or NASA scientists or any... (show quote)
I don't doubt the satellite data or what you're saying. However how many years of satellite data is there? Sixty four years tops. The first satellite was launch in 1958 and I'm sure it didn't measure temperature. Based on a ice age cycle 60 years of data isn't a large enough model to draw any conclusions. There isn't any concrete data beyond a 100 years ago and out of at least 100,000 years since the last ice age warm period there is no data to compare it with. Also I'm sure the technology to measure temperature is more accurate today than it was even 50 years ago therefore a few degrees of difference could be a variation in the accuracy of the thermometers or the equipment. No matter how you look at it there is too small a base for any concrete decision. So it's still junk science! Good Day.