Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jrh1354
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7
Aug 24, 2015 15:23:23   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I was offered the opportunity to set up an email account with Microsoft Outlook. I would enter all my current Time Warner, info and I could connect through Outlook, using my regular email address.

What, exactly, does that mean? Is there an advantage to using Outlook? How would it be different from my T-W connection?


Jerry,
I tried Outlook in WIN 10 and hated it. It's just not user friendly. I downloaded Windows Live Mail and it took me right back to the look and feel of the old e-mail programs. Outllook is now optimized for tablets and phones. Try Windows Live Mail - you'll immediately see and appreciate the difference.
Cheers - JRH
Go to
Aug 12, 2015 11:34:49   #
machia wrote:
I bought an adapter from B&H for $49 and have been using my old Minolta-Rokkor lenses on my Canon DSLR with great results. I researched these adaptors and decided that the one built by FotodioX with correction lens was best. No noticeable degradation in image quality, and no focus issues what so ever . The only limitation is that you can only shoot in manual or Aperature priority mode which is fine with me because those are the only modes that I usually shoot in . I wasn't going to give up all the light that my f1.2, 1.4 and 1.7 lenses offers me. To buy lenses new at these f-stops and of this quality would be VERY expensive ! I'd stack the old Rokkors and Nikkors up to anything out there, especially considering the fact that Minolta built many lenses for Leica with Minolta glass . These old lenses are of high quality and well worth $49 for an adaptor to be able to still use them. Give this adapter a try !
I bought an adapter from B&H for $49 and have ... (show quote)



:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 10:14:32   #
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 9, 2015 16:53:52   #
Just keep in mind that this camera was made between 1950-1958. That makes it at least 60 years old. It likely could use a thorough CLA to operate anywhere near the original specs. I have the whole Signet series and they are truly worth saving. The design and engineering of these beauties shows what could be done with slide-rules and non-automated manufacturing equipment.
Go to
Aug 3, 2015 11:27:27   #
MKS.S-BEAU wrote:
Have a Nikon N 80 whose surface on the camera back has gotten tacky. Anyone run across this and was able to get rid of the tacky feeling of the back? Thanks.


This is a well-known problem among Nikon film camera users. The only sure way to correct the problem is to replace the back. Nikon was providing replacement backs at no charge provided you could prove you bought the camera from an authorized Nikon dealer. As I understand it now, they've exhausted their supply of replacement backs. Buying a used one to cannibalize for the back generally doesn't work since their backs are also starting to soften. The N80, N90, and F100 all suffer from this malady. They were really great film cameras - too bad Nikon messed up on trying to apply a non-slip coating without adequate testing.
Go to
Jul 27, 2015 13:13:12   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Agfa Pan 25 and KodaChrome 25 Both delivered incredible resolution that I have not yet found in the digital world.

I also like the other spectrum side with the Ilford 1000 especially when used with sepia paper.


I'll second that - can't beat Kodachrome slide film or Ilford paper.
Go to
Jul 26, 2015 18:39:00   #
I have the 18-140 with my D7000. The lens is equivalent to a 27-210 in FX. It's got a good range and is not that heavy. It is a bit pricy unless you can find a good deal on a re-furb - but it's definitely worth it.
Go to
Jul 21, 2015 11:37:06   #
02Nomad wrote:
James, did it come with the leather case and the Agfa Tully flash with its separate case?


Just the original leather case. e-Bay is really a crap-shoot. The same item can sell for twice as much on another day. Just depends on who is looking for a classic camera when you post.
Go to
Jul 21, 2015 11:03:40   #
I recently purchased one in very good condition on e-Bay for $49. That included shipping via USPS. The offer of $40 was on the mark.
Go to
Jul 12, 2015 11:09:11   #
houdel wrote:
I got a new (to me) Nikon F3 HP last week and a Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 lens this week. Thursday I loaded up a roll of film & took a bunch of casual snapshots around the yard just to test the new combo out. Friday I gave the roll of film to my 19 year old son to have it processed at the Walmart 1 hour photo lab after work (in our nearest "big city", Big Rapids MI, pop 10,600, 25 miles away).

He called me after work & informed me Walmart no longer had a 1 hour photo lab. I told him to try Walgreens and Meijers. A little later he called back, no one there does 1 hour photo processing anymore.

The last time I needed 1 hour photo processing, a couple of years ago, Walmart, Walgreens and Meijers all offered it. Today, nobody? The change must have been fairly recent as Meijers still had the 1 hour photo processing signage in place but they no longer offer the service, all film has to be sent out and has a 2 week turnaround time.

Now I understand film processing is way down in this digital age, but I thought it had pretty well leveled out or perhaps was even seeing a mild resurgence, so why did all three vendors in one area discontinue in house processing in such a relatively short time frame? If the answer is lack of demand I would have expected that after the first two discontinued the service there would still be enough remaining business to keep the third vendor going.

Is there something else in play here? I seem to vaguely recall from a couple of years ago that the EPA was going to issue some new regulations on waste photo chemical disposal due to the silver content in the processing solutions. So is this demand driven, or did the EPA put 1 hour photo labs out of business?
I got a new (to me) Nikon F3 HP last week and a Ni... (show quote)


I had similar experience with Walgreens here in Dayton. The manager told me that the corporate policy was to continue using the film processors until they needed maintenance. At that point, they were to be shipped to (I think he said New Jersey) a recycling facility. We're lucky. There's still one Walgreens store in south Dayton that has a working film processor. When it dies, the 2-week turn-around goes into effect. No more Kodachrome processing 2 years ago - C-41 processing is on endangered list.
Go to
Jul 8, 2015 15:10:31   #
Jencast2008 wrote:
I would be a novice or amateur then....building to something more with practice! Very good list searcher....great job!

Just a thought - photography fits well into the old craft model where you have Apprentices, Journeymen, and Masters. This directly addresses the level of their skill set and the mastery of same to produce products that others admire.
I consider myself at the Journeyman level. I've studied the craft and demonstrated my skill level - but I still have a lot to learn. I was a Semi-pro for a while in the 70's. Never could make the transition from Semi-pro to Pro. Getting married created a vortex that sucked-up too much of my time. Not to mention the need to pay a mortgage, put food on the table, and cater to wifey's somewhat extravegant tastes.

I would remove novice from the list as it doesn't really line up with the other categories (if my suggestion of using craft levels were substituted).

Great post - lots of good ideas and intelligent discussion. Bravo Zulu
Go to
Jun 30, 2015 21:26:22   #
Peterff wrote:
How about a "my first serious camera" response?


These were the cameras that got me started collecting classic cameras. This 1980 Moscow Olympics camera is in my collection - along with about 20 others the USSR designated to honor the Olympics (that the USA boycotted). Now that I'm retired, I'm going to do my best to run one roll of film through every one of these cameras.
Go to
Jun 29, 2015 15:36:01   #
rmalarz wrote:
http://nationaldaycalendar.com/days-2/national-camera-day-june-29/

--Bob


Funny thing - they illustrated the announcement with a USSR Zenit camera (Industar 61 lens!).
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.