Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: druthven
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
Nov 28, 2023 14:20:08   #
btbg wrote:
It might but it might also hunt for focus. Simpler to manually focus with lens set on infinity. Then you dont have to worry about it.

Many camers wont focus with f8 big lenses, and when you add 16 or more stops of neutral density filter that is a lot more than f8.

Why on earth wouldnt you focus manually and know exactly what hou had?


Thanks for the info, I was just relying on my recent experience with the annular eclipse. Perhaps the best way to guarantee focus would be to do what I did in 2017. Since some lenses can focus beyond infinity check where the infinity symbol is when actually focused on something very far away, ie. the moon and before the eclipse set the focus ring there and immobilize it with electrician tape to prevent accidentally changing it.
Go to
Nov 27, 2023 18:04:40   #
Photolearner01 wrote:
Dear All:
I am planning to a location in the path of totality to shoot the eclipse. I am looking for recommendations on how best to shoot this event. First my equipment:
1. Canon R6, Canon RF 70 - 200mm F2.8 (good when totality is happening), A good steady tripod & a Remote shutter release.
Questions:
What kind of filter do I need to shoot while eclipse is partial? Is a 0.1% ND filter good enough protection for the R6 sensor when using an F2.8 lens?
Should I use a 400mm or a 200mm? The 400 is F5.6.
Since light will be changing fast near the totality I am thinking of using a magnetic filter kit; any issues with using those & the lens electronics?
Of course I also plan to use protective glasses for myself.
Thanks in advance for your advice.

Photolearner01


Also
Dear All: br I am planning to a location in the pa... (show quote)


Google Nikon USA, How to Photograph a Solar Eclipse and also google an eclipse map for the location you will be using. It should provide the times and durations of the different phases, The following info is from my photographing the 2017 total eclipse. You do not need f2.8, the whole thing can be shot at 5.6 or f8. I used 2 cameras both in DX format with an 80-200 lens during totality and an18-300 for the partial shots. this means my 35mm equivalents were 300mm and 450mm. Still they both required cropping which didn't seem to effect the images. Your camera is full frame so the 400mm is probably minimum. If your lens is not a zoom I strenuously suggest renting one since with the filter in place the viewfinder is completely black unless the sun is in the frame and at 400mm it is very, very difficult to find the sun even though you think you know where you are pointing the camera. I routinely zoomed out to 50mm to find the sun and then zoom in on it. Contrary to another post the camera will autofocus with the filter on if the sun is in the frame and the focus spot is on the sun's rim. Find Thousand Oaks Optical and other solar filters at Amazon. You will only need to remove the filter once when entering totality and reattach it only once when leaving totality so forget about magnetic filters. Shutter speeds during the partial phases will be 1/50th to 1/1000th at ISO about 640 so you can hand hold or use a monopod and reserve the tripod and release for totality where the speeds will be in the 1/80 to 1/500 range at ISO 200. During totality you will want to take several exposures at different speeds to capture the different aspects of the corona. I have included three shots for illustration purposes. An orange sun, monopod, (different filters different colors, the true color of the sun is white), 18-300 @ 300mm entire frame. A partial eclipse, monopod,18-300 @ 300 cropped and one of totality, 80-200 @ 200, f8, 1/125th at ISO 200 cropped.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Nov 27, 2023 15:11:30   #
btbg wrote:
Yiu need either a solar filter or at least 16 stpps of neutral density filters.

You also probably want a 400 mm lens or larger for totality, a wider lens is fine if you are shooting something such as other people wearing their glasses watching the eclipse.

You will also need to shoot with manual focus as the camera is unable to focus with the filter on it.

Just keep in mind that if you are too busy shooting you will moss out on really seeing the eclipse. A lot of people who shoot their first eclipse later say that they wish they had just watched it.
Yiu need either a solar filter or at least 16 stpp... (show quote)


The camera will focus with the solar filter on if the sun is in the frame and if the focal point is on the sun's rim.
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 19:02:38   #
Bohica wrote:
I'm 76, memory seems to decrease each day. 20 yrs ago I had a camera, either a Pentax Program or Ricoh XRP, had both, don't remember which I used. But it allowed me to place it on a tripod near my birdbath with a 36 exposure roll of film and it would take photos till the roll ended. I could set it at different intervals from 15 seconds to 60 seconds between exposures. Got a lot of good bird photos that way but don't remember the gear I used. Any old time film fanatics out there that might jog my memory? I was a collector and had about 40 cameras, Pentax, Ricoh, Nikon, Mamya 645, Yashicamat 6x6, Rolleiflex, and a host of old rangefinders
I'm 76, memory seems to decrease each day. 20 yrs ... (show quote)


I'm 87 and here are a couple of tips from Clint Eastwood to beat the sucks. Stay active, have an exercise program at least several days a week and if when you get up in the morning the old man tries to sneak in, kick him out
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 18:50:29   #
Joel Stuart wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am going on a European cruise mid 2024 and would love your opinions about what to take with me. I want only one lens and body. Here's what I have...

Nikon D700 and D7000

Lenses:
* Tokina 100 2.8
* Nikon 35-70 1.28D
* Tokina 17-35 F4 FX
* Nikon 50 1.8D
* Nikon 18-105 kit
* Tamron 70-300

If I were to take one body and one lens, what would be your choices and why?

Thank you
Joel


Having recently made a similar decision on a trip to Paris, I would grab the 7000 and the 18-105 and never look back. I used a 7100 and an 18-140.
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 18:37:50   #
To all of our more seasoned hoggers, I say keep at it. I'm 87 and I try to follow Clint Eastwood's advice, stay active. Have an exercise program that includes strength training and walking at least a few days a week. His other bit of advice that I follow is that when I get up in the morning and the old man tries to sneak in, I chase him out.
Go to
Nov 25, 2023 17:22:21   #
I began my love affair with photography circa 1952 with a Leica 111f, with a 3.5 Elmar lens that was a replacement for my mother's Foth Derby. My progression from there was a Leica M3 and Mamiyaflex two and a quarter square to a Nikon F and a Rolli 35 to a Nikon F3, to Nikon N100, to Nikon D200, to the two I now use, a D7100 and a D500. I doubt I will be transcending to mirrorless as the DSLRs are doing fine.
Go to
Nov 23, 2023 13:36:15   #
User ID wrote:
If you cant be bothered to swipe it and post it here than it doesnt really matter.


Sounds like someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. What's the purpose of nitpicking an amusing and interesting post? Oh, on that subject, a bit of proofreading would have replaced than with then and doesnt with doesn't. Oh my, I do believe I just nitpicked myself.
Go to
Nov 18, 2023 19:07:02   #
Having endured 6+ Mohs procedures on my face and scalp I would be more than just optimistic that you will have no problem using your camera with the left eye.
Go to
Nov 16, 2023 18:03:58   #
My knowledge concerning pixels, size, number, bit depth, files, size, megapixels etc. is limited and woefully inadequate. I would welcome recommendations for sources of education.
Go to
Nov 15, 2023 15:24:14   #
Modern paleontology.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 10, 2023 18:34:17   #
larryepage wrote:
See if the aperture lever on the lens freely moves and closes the aperture down. One possibility is gummed up lubricant on the iris blades causing everything to stick in the open position. I have had this happen to a couple of older lenses by other manufacturers. If that's what's happening, a clean and lube of the lens should fix the problem.


This is a distinct possibility especially if the lens has been over heated such as being left in a hot car. The lubricant runs and gets on the blades and when it cools causes them to stick.
Go to
Nov 9, 2023 14:41:17   #
Many years ago I had a Doc Holliday type of mustache. I got so tired of turning chips with dips upside down I shaved it off and haven't looked back.
Go to
Nov 9, 2023 14:30:01   #
WILLARD98407 wrote:
in Washington the law says that we are able to make a right turn at a red LIGHT after stopping and verifying that the intersection is clear of traffic and peds.

the law also states that if you are stopped by a red ARROW there is no free turn allowed. The red arrow specifically controls the right turn. People who are ignorant of the law just cruise on through the red arrow as if it weren't even there.

Some like to exercise their electrical noise-making safety device because they are annoyed at someone actually waiting for the red arrow to turn green.

first a toot. then two toots. then a blast. (some skip the first two stages of protest and go directly to the blast)

uneducated dolts..

it's on the driving test.

(maybe not the KMart version)
in Washington the law says that we are able to mak... (show quote)



I'm sure there are numerous additions to the driver's test I took, circa 1952. No expressways, freeways or interstates and the left hand and arm served for the nonexistent turn signals. The Texas test still retains the dreaded parallel parking.
Go to
Nov 8, 2023 18:54:02   #
Eric2018 wrote:
It might be bad if you or a loved one were one of the 76.
And it may depend on the denominator - if it's 1% of all traffic fatalities, it'll be closer to 5,000 per year.
And what's in the numerator? If we look only at pedestrian deaths at "right turn allowed on red light" intersections who were crossing on a green (or "walk") light, how many deaths? Half of the 7,624? 10%?
And have deaths at "right turn allowed on red light" intersections risen faster or slower that all pedestrian deaths?
I wonder if those responsible for pedestrian fatalities at "right turn allowed on red light" intersections would drive more safely if the law were changed? Or if pedestrians would be less careful if they were more confident a driver would not blow through the red light and run them down?

-Eric
It might be bad if you or a loved one were one of ... (show quote)


If we could ticket those offenders it sure help the city budget. Stop signs also, even a rolling stop has become a rarity.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.