JohnSwanda wrote:
hopefully I can post a link by now without getting it moved. This shows the emphasis of each episode.
https://iconmusicthroughthelens.com
Thank you.
Please do not move.
While I think I will pass, it should motivate (and inform) others to attend. And, I now know what music photography is as I had never heard of it before. There is just too much to learn and there are other topics I do not pursue e.g., through a microscope.
What is music photography?
There are multiple versions of JPEG. The last transition I watched was to JPEG 2000 and it had significant enhancements over the earlier version (JPEG 79?). JPEG 2000 is probably history now. But each version adds improvements so just "old JPEGs" is not an accurate description.
Personally, I am moving to RAW -- but that is a personal decision and wanting to do more with the photo. I am still learning.
If JPEG satisfies your needs, why do more. You should be your own master.
If online speed will ever be important, look for MIMO 2X2. The number of simultaneous wireless clients on a router can be the speed limiter -- as I am now discovering. WIFI-5 or WIFI-6. I do not think any laptop will be 4X4. I would offer more, but I am just discovering. Some others may amplify.
I think I remember an "Olympus Penn FT" (name?) half-frame 35mm camera that was very popular in the 60s or 70s. It got 72 photos on a 36 exposure roll of film.
Read this article (an earlier listing on UHH)
https://photographylife.com/dslr-has-no-future
You may find that this is a good time to go mirrorless. You have to decide.
I am a Nikon DSLR user with no foreseeable need to upgrade to mirrorless.
DSLRs have reached the end of potential innovations -- seller motivation to upgrade. While both DSLR and mirrorless are digital, future development (enhancements) will be in mirrorless. They need to stimulate buyers' need to have the latest and greatest -- whether they need it or not.
mrova wrote:
They can be very destructive, and very interesting to read about. Found this little tidbit a while ago:
"If you have a flat worm infestation, there are several ways to control or kill populations. The first thing to keep in mind is, if you attempt to chop a flat worm in half or even smash them, the pieces will only regenerate into new flat worms. So, if you chop a flat worm into 7 pieces, you will end up with 7 new worms! You must dissolve the flat worm completely in order to get rid of it. Treatment methods include: salt, vinegar, and citrus oil. These products must be applied directly to the flat worms in order to be effective."
They can be very destructive, and very interesting... (
show quote)
Nice photo, but as noted above -- this is a bad-news invasive specie.
camerapapi wrote:
Most probably some of you here participated a couple of days ago of an educational talk on the new Nikon editing software sponsored by Nikonians. I never finished watching Versace explaining how to use the program. I got lost in the first 5 minutes.
I sent an email to Mr. Eric Bowles who was in charge of organizing the talk to express my disappointment. Mr. Versace went into vague technical details but when it came to clearly explain the different parameters that could be used with the editor he failed miserably. Studio NX is a great editor for Nikon cameras, designed precisely to reveal all the qualities present in a Nikon RAW data. Like I have said in the past, Studio NX is the only editor that will accurately reproduce all of the colors captured by a Nikon camera.
Watching videos on line I found a young man who has educational videos from time to time about how to use features in Photoshop. To my surprise he has an excellent one on Studio NX. His explanations are so simple to follow and to the point. Now, after watching his video I feel more capable using Studio NX. For those that could be interested in learning more about this new editor from Nikon just follow this link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD9trkvl4Oc
Studio NX is not perfect, as a matter of fact it is in its first stage of development but it has parameters that will enhance your Nikon experience.
Most probably some of you here participated a coup... (
show quote)
Also on YouTube: "Photo Blue" as a review and about 18 tutorials on NX Studio. Other product tutorials as well.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfT5lswEaYhgdLCl-4-eq2A
richardjkirby601 wrote:
Looks like for Sony DLSR users we need to plan upgrades - should I stay with Sony or look at Canon or Nikon? I have been on the APSC sensor for years and know that moving to full-frame was the next step, but since it meant buying all-new lenses had been dragging it out.
I don't shoot weddings (too much pressure), but general nature (birds & animals), some sports, and a little architecture/buildings/landmarks.
What would you suggest for new camera gear?
What's the rush? If you are happy with what you have, wait. DSLRs have about maxed out their potential for innovation and upgrade. I think today's DSLRs far exceed what anyone expected to get for the price we pay. However, my APSC DSLR still exceeds my needs.
Manufacturers may continue to sell DSLRs until the profit margin drops too low or is dampening mirrorless sales but are unlikely to invest in upgrades and innovations.
Mirrorless is the future and marketing will push them to pay for innovation and upgrades. New capabilities and promotions will probably bring the cost down. This may include more internal storage in emerging models for AI.
In the interim, one may find used DSLR items being sold by those who need mirrorless now, invest in post processing (mirrorless is still digital), upgrade other items (e.g. tripod), or just save your money for when you need a new mirrorless capability.
Buy what you need.
Shooter41 wrote:
Dear John Maher...Your comments and suggestions are well taken. I find myself hesitant to throw images away that are in focus on the birds eye and properly exposed even if a tiny bit of a bird feeder is included. I am not against man made objects, but prefer they be left out if possible. Here is one image I love and cannot get rid of just because the corner of a feeder had to be included.
Great. That bird has an attitude!
Some audiences may prefer the feeder, it may be the only shot you have of a subject, or, as in this case, it may have other features that just outweigh the feeder issue.
No rule is absolute and there will always be some differences of opinion. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" or something like that.
Shooter41 wrote:
D. K. Prathap, bird photographer from India, recommends adding some of the background to bird images to aid in telling a more complete story. In this particular image, there are leaves in the back ground; a twig in the foreground and a suet cage underneath the bird. My own personal artistic tastes like the three dimensional effect the surroundings give to the image. Since I don't have a client yet, that is all that matters. But because I want to improve in general, I would appreciate hearing from excellent photographers on UHH whether they like or dislike the surrounding items in this particular image. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
D. K. Prathap, bird photographer from India, recom... (
show quote)
Great photo.
I really like the 3D effect with some (twig and some leaves) in-focus in addition to the subject. And I like the bokeh background.
Generally, I would try to keep bait like the feeder out of the picture -- maybe have a limb above the feeder. However, that may vary with the audience.
TommiRulz wrote:
It seems like every new camera that comes out says, "focused more toward video than stills"...... I know vlogging is the new thing, but - I would love to see a camera that doesn't have all the video stuff and is focused more toward stills. Is there such a camera ? Have I missed it?
I think it has a lot to do with running out of features to add on (upgrades) for DSLR.
While I have no need (or plans) to migrate to mirrorless, this is an opportunity for manufacturers to expand camera capabilities (the medium is still digital). This will be more than just new lenses -- but improvements and features that have not even been envisioned yet. Look back at the original DSLRs.
The drive to create a reason to upgrade (e.g., adding video) may have actually kept the cost down by increasing the volume of sales. The competition among multiple brands and innovation are what keep prices within reach for millions of us amateurs. Many of those "pro" features have come down to "beginner" or "advanced" models. Why would anyone want all those controls and just put it in "auto". Some (like me) are not good enough to need a "pro" model.
Is this a good time to upgrade? For me -- no; for many -- yes. But look at how fast the new models (capabilities) are hitting the market.
I think this article (was in "Links and Resources") section provided a good assessment of the evolving photography market including DSLRs, Cell Phones, and Mirrorless.
https://photographylife.com/dslr-has-no-future
Looking for manufacturer (e.g., Hoya, Nikon)
The three in plastic cases on the left side look like they may be Nikon cases.
Nikon filters are screw in.
Which, if any, are Nikon Filters.
Nikon DSLRs have two-button reset -- press two buttons at the same time for two seconds to reset to default. The two buttons are indicated by a green dot next to each. This may not work if one of those two is one that is not functioning. Or maybe it will work for this.