Black Bart wrote:
You forgot to mention Berkley is also the home of the Batshit crazies on the left.
I'm sure you agree with the whole article.
Big deal!!! Even BamBam has a Nobel prize.
gmcase wrote:
This guy is such an incredible liar. I don't think I have ever known of someone that lies so easily, readily and in such copious amounts. He even can keep a straight face but he does have some tells.
It's not him that amazes me, it's the sheep that believe him.
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
What? If it ain't on Fox it isn't real?
It's only real if Chris Matthews has a thrill running up his leg.
Hers is a thought: How much
more would we be giving to Wal-Mart employees if they were not employed by Wal-Mart????
PrairieSeasons wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/with-2015-budget-request-obama-will-call-for-an-end-to-era-of-austerity/2014/02/20/332808c2-9a6e-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html
If we're ending goobermint austerity does that mean that the Obama's can resume taking Air Force 1 vacations?
Doe it mean that the goobermint will now be able to fund projects like Solyndra?
Does it mean that the goobermint will now be able to fund $100,000 outhouses in Alaska? ( http://blog.heritage.org/2013/12/30/mb-1230-booze-pole-dancing-luxurious-hotels-top-10-examples-government-waste-2013/ )
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/wit... (
show quote)
"With the 2015 budget request, Obama will call for an end to the era of austerity that has
dogged much of his presidency............"
That's funny stuff right there.
bvm wrote:
He's got a thing for Chris Matthews and Maddows. One jerk and one dyke, and ts hasn't figured out which one he likes more.
When the dems brainwash you, all hope is gone!
I like Maddow. He's the most interesting 13 year old boy on television.
It's a good thing someone opposed this, most of the news organizations would not have. In fact, they would probably like it. That way, the FCC can report back to our glorious leader and tell him how they (the "news" casters) are in goose-step with the regime and are doing their part to advance the progressive agenda (of course they are already doing this, but they are not getting the individual recognition they require).
How glorious, Comrade.
magicray wrote:
Hahaha!
:thumbup:
And there is the reaction a troll looks for.
Wow. I was looking at the new version.
lowkick wrote:
I concur. I have a 430 and a 600, but I wanted a couple of additional flashes to use as strobes when I need 3 or 4 flashes set up to get the effect I want. I got a Yongnuo 560 III to try. It's great and I will be getting another one soon. I don't know where you paid $200 for the 560 II, but the 560 III was $75 on eBay - new. Yongnuo Professional Flash Speedlight Flashlight Yongnuo YN 560 III http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BXA7N6A/ref=oh_details_o05_s00_i01?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I paid around $80 for the manual Yongnuo. I was guessing at the price for the TTL flashes.
I just looked. The Yongnuo 568EX is around $180 each. These flashes can be controlled in camera (depends on model).
This doesn't matter anyway!!! We were all relieved when we found out that "companies under 50 employees will not be affected". So, we spent a year thinking that this complete mess would not interfere with us. We had a meeting 2 weeks ago. Can you guess what it's about???? Our insurance will increase by 65% as of January 1, 2015. We are a small bussiness with a caring boss. Up until now, we have not had to pay a cent for our insurance. In fact, to keep our policy affordable last year, my boss chose a policy that had a $1,500 a year deductible for each of us. He set up an escrow account to cover all of our deductibles.
He's way too small to take an increase of 65%. So starting next year, he will add the amount he's currently paying for each of us to our paychecks and we will have to go on our own. I'm getting a little tired of the bullshit in Washington!
Check out the Yongnuos that have full TTL & ETTL functions. I own 4 of the 560 II, fully manual. They work great, and always read only positive reviews. I think they are under $200.
Nice shot. Is this lens as sharp @ 600mm as it is @ 400mm?
Higher taxes have no affect on the Democratic donors, they just don't pay their taxes.
The problem is that whoever drafts him also gets a 3 ring media circus ( a la Tebow). I think that fact alone will hurt him more than the fact he's gay. I don't think it's something he should hide, but I do think he went about it in a bad way.
Thanks for replying. Another common one seems to be eyeglasses. First they are on, then not, then are again. If there are people watching out for these things ( I have heard this also), as someone mentioned above, then how many mistakes are they catching???