Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Fezz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
Dec 20, 2012 17:44:32   #
Hi Bram boy
That's with one lens, the 10-30mm which actually gives quite a bit of zoom! I received the camera several days ago and couldn't be happier! It is easy to use, takes very high speed singles and great HD movies and very nice singles. The optical viewfinder is also great and is coupled to the zoom and views through the lens. Apparently my $299.00 deal was a two day special because they are back up to $399.00 now at the same dealer - Kenmore Camera in Washington State.

There is no flash but one is available.

Fezz


Bram boy wrote:
Fezz wrote:
I am considering buying a small lightweight camera to use as my "walk around camera" since my D7000 is somewhat heavy. I have been attracted to the Nikon Mirrorless 1-J1. Does anyone have any experience with or thoughts about this camera? I have found one on sale at $299.00 which seems to be somewhat less than what they are selling for.

Thanks so much for any information you may have!


is that with one lens or two, a friend just bought one. with two lenses for $499plus tax.if you can get it around the same price go for, it just as good as all the other stuff they have, the only way you will is spend more money. im thinking of one for my self. but all the other 4 /3 that cost $600 or more you might just well get a d5100 or d3200 d3100 you will get a better picture.
quote=Fezz I am considering buying a small lightw... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 18, 2012 15:08:04   #
Thanks for the response. I realized while reading your response that I had meant to say 1-V1 not 1-J1. I believe that the 1-V1 is actually a better camea but I believe I'll do some comparison work. Thanks again!


Cdouthitt wrote:
If you want to get into the mirrorless market, I highly recommend the m4/3 or sony nex format. you can alway get adaptors to fit your nikon lenses.

I have an Olympus EMP2 with a 45mm f1/8 lens and find myself grabbing that camera for daily candid shots of my kids, vs my pro body E5 w/12-60. The EPM2 is a fraction of the weight and a blast to shoot, especially with the touchscreen.

I'm considering right now selling off the E-5 and most of my lenses to switch solely to that format. The OMD EM5 is a spectacular camera, and the Lecia 25mm f1.4, Olympus 75mm 1.8, and 12mm f2 would suit my shooting style perfectly.

Leave the J1 to Ashton to shoot.
If you want to get into the mirrorless market, I h... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 18, 2012 15:03:53   #
Thanks much for the response. I realized as I read your response that I had meant to say Nikon 1-V1 not 1-J1. It seems that the 1-V1 is a better camera. I think I'll do a little more comparison work!



sloscheider wrote:
I'm a Nikon D7000 owner too but have to say I think they missed the mark on their mirrorless models... I don't think I've read a single favorable review on any of the models to date. They chose to use a smaller image sensor than the common 4/3 type and subsequently it falls short when compared to pretty much any of its competitors...

Then again, for $300... that's a pretty good price... If it was closer to $500 then it would have to compete with the Sony models with the same size sensor as your D7000.

I'll be interested to see what other have to say.
I'm a Nikon D7000 owner too but have to say I thin... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 18, 2012 00:26:28   #
I am considering buying a small lightweight camera to use as my "walk around camera" since my D7000 is somewhat heavy. I have been attracted to the Nikon Mirrorless 1-J1. Does anyone have any experience with or thoughts about this camera? I have found one on sale at $299.00 which seems to be somewhat less than what they are selling for.

Thanks so much for any information you may have!
Go to
Nov 29, 2012 01:38:57   #
gnzlzspd wrote:
Fezz wrote:
BW326 wrote:
Interesting to see where all the money went back then.



I may be dating myself but I worked in gas stations when I was in High School and can remember gas at 17 cents for regular and 21 cents for ethel


I know you meant ethyl, Ethel was the cashier!!!


Thanx gnzlzspd, besides being and old goat I'm a lousy speller!
Go to
Nov 28, 2012 13:02:53   #
BW326 wrote:
Interesting to see where all the money went back then.



I may be dating myself but I worked in gas stations when I was in High School and can remember gas at 17 cents for regular and 21 cents for ethel
Go to
Nov 25, 2012 18:24:21   #
That's certainly obvious from reading this thread!


woody54895 wrote:
I have concluded that Republicans/Conservatives are really really poor losers.
Go to
Nov 7, 2012 18:18:15   #
"it" is the third leg of your tripod!


MT Shooter wrote:
ggttc wrote:
Hankwt wrote:
9 months????
Taint nuttin'!
I've had NAS for around 40 years now! It don't go away!!!!


If you expierience NAS for more than 40 years please see your doctor immediately . Do not use NAS if you use nitrates as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure ............


Also, if you experience "something" that lasts more than 4 hours...


Isn't that what a tripod is for? Helping keep it up?[/quote]
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 15:52:56   #
Hi jprib, You can't go wrong with a D7000! I love mine. I notice that you said you plan to share lenses with your daughter. This suggests the possibility that your camera body could spend some time without a lens attached. Be sure to keep the cover on the front of the camera to keep the dust out as that can degrade your pictures. I would suggest that you also buy an inexpensive Nikon lens to keep on the camera to keep out the dust as well as make the camera more ready in the event you see something you want a picture of.





jprib wrote:
Getting new camera, daughter has Nikon , I want to get Nikon D7000 body only and we will share lenses . Does anyone recommend this camera ?
Have been reading great reviews as well as looking at photos from this one.
Any advice will be well taken... Thx
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 14:02:30   #
Pentony, While I totally agree with your analysis it seems to me that fixing it may not be as easy as it seems. We would need to replace all of congress at the same time, apply term limits, place salary controls and limits, remove lobbyists, yet make the job attractive enough to attract good people who would be rewarded for their accomplishments. However, under the current system the people who would have to make and initiate the new rules are the very ones who have made all the rules in the past. I'm sure that they would not be interested in ending their cushy jobs. How could we ever get around that? Unfortunatly, I don't see that ever happening.






Pentony wrote:
You Want Change In The Federal Government ? ? ?

It's a shame that most of us don't understand how our Federal Government is supposed to work.

There are three equal branches. The operative word is 'equal.' As such when things go right they all get part of the credit and when things go wrong we the people blame only one part of the government.

In addition to the three branches there are also two additional branches.

The Three Main Equal Branches of The Federal Government

The reason why the country's forefathers created three branches (parts) of government was to avoid we the people from being ruled by a dictatorship, king or queen. Unfortunately we the people are guilty of creating kings and queens. How do we do this? First a little lesson in Civics.

The main three equal branches of the Federal Government (please note the words “equal” and “main”);
1. Congress - whose two primary purposes are
a. to write just, Constitutional (valid) proposed laws and
b. to fund the implementation of signed laws
There primary purpose is not to enrich themselves especially at the expense of the people. Does this sound familiar?

2. President - who signs or vetoes the proposed laws. If;
a. the President signs the proposed law, bill, then the bill becomes law and the President
1) is tasked with implementing the law providing Congress funds the law. See 1a.
b. the President vetoes the proposed law then the proposed law is returned to Congress
who has three choices;
1) forget about the proposed law
2) override the President’s veto by a certain number of votes
3) rewrite the proposed law and re-submit it to the President. See 2a.

The President has a third choice. The President can veto, sign or ignore the proposed law. If the president chooses to do nothing as in ignoring the proposed law, the proposed law sits on the President’s desk and after a prescribed number of days, the bill, proposed law, automatically becomes law. Then see 2a1). if the law is challenged it becomes subject to the Judiciary.

3. Judiciary or Supreme Court - whose main purposes is to state whether or not a law is
a. Constitutional, hence valid and it is to be implemented (see 2a1) or
b. the proposed law is un-Constitutional, hence not to be implemented. Then the law, goes back to Congress.

Two Additional Equal Branches of The Federal Government

Over the centuries and decades, over 230 years, during the existence of our country there has come to believe by some that there are two additional branches to the Federal Government;

4. We the people whose responsibilities are
a. to elect, our Congressional politicians by voting them
1) in office
2) out of office
3) to continue in office
b. to check on our Congressional politicians
c. to amend the Constitution. You don’t know we can do that?

5. The Free Press (media; newspapers, magazines, radio, TV, etc.) whose main responsibility is to report the facts, news, without biased or opinions. Opinions are to be left to editorials.

In the history of our country, of the 44 Presidents, there has been only one bad President and he was impeached.

SO MY POINT

The point of this prose is that when things go wrong or go not to our likening, it is easy to point our finger at one person, the standing President, rather than look at the whole system. Since the branches are equal, when things go wrong, all are to blame. Let’s fix all. Under President Bush there were things done not to our eventual likening but they would not have been done without the complicities of Congress and the apathy of we the people.

There is a reason why we’ve have a “DO NOTHING CONGRESS.” This current Congress has spent over the last three years making sure that the current “President is a one term President (their words) ,” instead of working for the benefit of we the people, working for the benefit of the country as a whole. AND we the people have been apathetic by failing to exercise all our responsibilities.

We the people have failed in our responsibilities to hold Congress accountable and the media has inflamed things. If you want to blame someone, first blame yourselves.

So how are we the people guilty of creating kings and queens? We don’t vote AND we don’t hold Congress responsible. In other words we don’t exercise ALL our responsibilities. We keep re-electing the same do nothing politicians in effect making them our kings and queens. What do we do? We complain. We don’t act.

So no matter who becomes the 45th President, this country is doomed unless we exercise all our responsibilities. VOTE AND HOLD CONGRESS RESPONSIBLE.

I've not gotten into the rolls of the Congress and the President in waging war and foreign policy. Am just looking at our domestic situation.

By the way;
1. We are not a democracy. We are a republic, supposedly a representative democracy.
2. The concept of democracy doesn’t work well in all cultures. It may not work at all in some cultures. The Middle East is the Middle East; they are who they are. Their cultural does not support the concept of democracy. So let’s keep a strong defense force.
3. Why does Congress have
a. better health benefits than we do?
b. life time pension with health benefits after only working (playing) in Congress for a few years?
c. automatic pay raises?

Why. . .because we the people have failed to exercise all our responsibilities. Congress works for us not we work for them. Maybe it is time for Term Limits? Maybe it is time to restrict their health benefits, pensions and paychecks? Let’s fix all, including us. Maybe it is time for another Constitutional Amendment?


VOTE, EXERCISE ALL OUR RESPONSIBILITIES, AND HOLD
WE THE PEOPLE AND CONGRESS RESPONSIBLE
WHILE REDUCING OUR DEPENDENCY ON FOREIGN OIL
You Want Change In The Federal Government ? ... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 9, 2012 12:46:30   #
I second ACountry! You'll love the D7000. I also have a D80 but kept it and keep my Macro lens on that body so I don't have to pull my 18-200 VR off of the D7000. The D80 also doubles now as my back-up. The D7000's are selling at reduced prices right now. Go for it!


BEEVEE wrote:
Hi folks ,
UHH is a great place to learn & interact.
I have a D 80, 18-70 nikkor & recently acquired 70-300 VRII. I am mainly doing travel photography which includes some landscape as I trek & climb. A bit of widlife. I am thinking to buy a D 7000 & dispose off D 80. Will it be a good idea ? If I keep D 80 as second body will it match with D 7000?
I hope the experienced folks here will give me some guidance :-)
Go to
Oct 6, 2012 02:54:18   #
These were taken with my first digital, a fuji. It is looking west over Admiralty inlet and the Olympic mountains from Whidbey Island in Washington State.




Go to
Sep 27, 2012 00:40:58   #
LouEllen wrote:
If someone owns the Nikon D90, D7000, and D800, would you be willing to post a few shots? What I'd like to see is a comparison using the exact same shot from each camera. In fact, if possible, I'd like to see the comparison of a portrait shot, landscape, etc.

If you have 2 of the 3, I'd still like to see the comparison shots. My current camera is the D90, but I'm looking to upgrade and will likely buy either the 7000 or 800. I know there are plenty of shots to examine on the internet, but when the photographer and the subject are different, it is like comparing apples and oranges.


Lou Ellen,

Here's a flower picture taken with D7000 and Nikor 18-200 zoom at 200mm. The lens used will make a lot of difference

Fezz

Thanks!
Lou Ellen
If someone owns the Nikon D90, D7000, and D800, wo... (show quote)


Go to
Sep 24, 2012 16:36:13   #
Jack Mac wrote:
That isn't true. I updated my latest iPad at the same time
it updated my iPhone 4S.
It also included Siri like my iPhone 4S already had.


CNET has been known to be wrong!
Go to
Sep 24, 2012 15:15:41   #
Bubu wrote:
Wonder what we would loose with iOS6. Not upgrading yet until I Know for example, if all my Apps will run the same.


According to CNET the IPAD upgrade is not yet available in the US. It is now in Europe. No date for the USA yet.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.