Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: gvarner
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 450 next>>
Feb 23, 2024 13:24:07   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Fast or slow shutter speed, how do you decide?
Linda From Maine wrote:
The OP has posted eight topics in his five weeks of membership. All seem designed to encourage conversation and learning. I consider him more a facilitator/moderator than someone looking for specific "help." We need a lot more of these kinds of topics!

Calling out rudeness is a waste of time and disruptive to a thread. Just think of the trolls, bullies and Great Truth Tellers as "white noise." Or "naked and afraid." That's what works for me
The OP has posted eight topics in his five weeks o... (show quote)


Perhaps such quieries should be prefaced with "Your opinion please", or "Your thoughts".
Go to
Feb 23, 2024 10:27:18   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Fast or slow shutter speed, how do you decide?
Your "desired" final result determines your camera settings. Otherwise you’re just taking a snapshot and not making a photo. If you’re just doing snapshots then use AUTO.
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 09:49:37   #
(Photo Gallery)
Stained glass
Oooo, that shameless hussy. 😊
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 09:27:58   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Imagine Your Photograph
It’s the difference between taking a photo and making a photo. Big difference. But each approach can produce an excellent photo. One of the pros in our camera club planned a shot for three years in Antelope Canyon, finally got to make the shot and was selling a very large print for $10,000. One of the advanced photographers made a beautiful graphics shot of rain drops on her car's mirror. A real stunner.
Go to
Feb 18, 2024 09:50:43   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Processing vs Post Processing
DirtFarmer wrote:
SOOPP?


Or we can have See How I Tried. 😁
Go to
Feb 18, 2024 09:42:30   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Processing vs Post Processing
We have SOOC so now we can have POOC. 😊
Go to
Feb 17, 2024 11:54:21   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Can’t email full-sized photos
Real Nikon Lover wrote:
When I send an email using Outlook from my desktop/local drive, I can send it as an embedded image or an attached image. Outlook embedded compresses the image and it can usually be sent without problem. If I attach the same image it cannot be sent as it exceeds the 20 megabytes allowed by the provider (GMAIL and SPECTRUM).

I have not noticed a significant loss in resolution sending it as an embedded file using HTML as the email format and "Insert, Pictures. This Device" method.


Downsize your image to less than 20 meg or use a service like Drop Box.
Go to
Feb 17, 2024 10:57:35   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Can’t email full-sized photos
Send the photo as an attachment to the email. Don’t copy then paste it into the email.
Go to
Feb 13, 2024 11:24:03   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
One more time on editing RAW files
DirtFarmer wrote:
The original raw file may be changed when it comes to metadata or the jpg preview, but the original raw data in the raw file ARE NEVER CHANGED. It is not a question of saving the edited file. The original raw data are not changed. The raw data are the important bits from the sensor. Since they are never changed, they provide a consistent starting point for an editing program to apply edits.


What part of metadata is changed? How can the embedded preview file be changed by an edit since you save your work with a different file name?
Go to
Feb 13, 2024 11:09:48   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
One more time on editing RAW files
dsnoke wrote:
I'm not trying to debate the value of RAW files. I shoot only RAW. But I have seen statement that one can not edit a raw file. I believe that is correct, but there are some nuances that need to be explained. So what follows is my more complete (I think) explanation.

A raw file is just the data collected by the sensor in the camera, nothing more or less. What one sees, whether raw or some other format, is a rendering of that raw data by some software program. That rendering may take the form of a jpeg file or TIFF file or GIF file or whatever file format your viewing program uses.

So when you open a raw file in ACR or Affinity Photo or any other program, what you see is that program's rendering of the raw data. If you then make changes and save the file, that saved file may or may not include the original raw data. If you save the changed file as a jpeg file, then the raw data is not saved. If you save a TIFF file, then the raw data is not save, but more data is kept than in a jpeg file. I'm not sure about other file formats.

Some programs may keep a record of changes as a sidecar file or other method. In that case, the program may keep the original raw data. Then, when you reopen the file, the rendering can start with the raw data and reapply the changes for you to see.

Make sense? Comments are welcome.
I'm not trying to debate the value of RAW files. ... (show quote)


As long as the edited file is saved with an extension like jpg or tiff for example, the original RAW file is not changed. It’s that simple. I use Photoshop Elements and save all my edited files as psd files.
Go to
Feb 13, 2024 11:05:20   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Downloading Photos from Phone
maxlieberman wrote:
No, I have a Dell.


Don’t use the Dell Photos app. Open File Explorer, navigate down to your device, open it and select the folder DCIM. Your photos will be in that folder. There ma be one or more DCIM's with slightly different names but they all contain photos. Copy and Paste the photos you want to a folder on your HD.
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 19:16:55   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Permission to use a photo
Wyantry wrote:
I am not wishing to start an argument, but the “Terms and Conditions” of the Hedgehog Forum explicitly state:

”USE OF INFORMATION FROM THIS WEBSITE

Unless you have entered into an express written contract with this website to the contrary, visitors, viewers, subscribers, members, affiliates, or customers have no right to use this information in a commercial or public setting; they have no right to broadcast it, copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish any portions of the content of this website.
By viewing the contents of this website you agree this condition of viewing and you acknowledge that any unauthorized use is unlawful and may subject you to civil or criminal penalties.

Again, Visitor has no rights whatsoever to use the content of, or portions thereof, including its databases, invisible pages, linked pages, underlying code, or other intellectual property the site may contain, for any reason for any use whatsoever. Nothing.
Visitor agrees to liquidated damages in the amount of U.S.$100,000 in addition to costs and actual damages for breach of this provision. Visitor warrants that he or she understands that accepting this provision is a condition of viewing and that viewing constitutes acceptance.

OWNERSHIP OF WEBSITE OR RIGHT TO USE, SELL, PUBLISH CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE

The website and its contents are owned or licensed by the website. Material contained on the website must be presumed to be proprietary and copyrighted. Visitors have no rights whatsoever in the site content. Use of website content for any reason is unlawful unless it is done with express contract or permission of the website.”
b I am not wishing to start an argument, but the ... (show quote)


That spells it out pretty clearly. All the material here is proprietary to the website. So, if it’s theirs, what can they do with it? 😉
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 19:10:30   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Permission to use a photo
Longshadow wrote:

Neither does posting images on the internet make them public property...................


I think all this dialogue here shows that copyright law is completely unenforceable unless we wish to enforce it on ourselves.
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 13:23:14   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Permission to use a photo
dustie wrote:
Really?
Is that something like vehicles parked at curbside on a public street, rather than in a private garage attached to a private dwelling, are public property -- ever since streetside curbs were invented?


That’s a ridiculous comparison. Vehicles are registered to their owner for one thing and parking on a designated area on a public street does not make them public property. You need to think ahead about what you post in Ryder to keep from looking silly instead of brilliant.
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 12:25:44   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Permission to use a photo
This may help dispel some of the ignorance around this issue. Technically, the maker owns it but keeping others from using it without permission of the owner is a harder sell.

https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 450 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.