Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jamesl
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 97 next>>
Mar 15, 2018 08:45:22   #
Linda2 wrote:
I would like some opinions on Affinity tutorials, paid or free, a good one for beginners. Has anyone used Udemy? Thank you.


The Affinity Photo website has over 100 tutorials available that are all free. On YouTube, if you search for "Carl Surrey", you will find additional tutorials.
Go to
Mar 10, 2018 15:09:07   #
gary8803 wrote:
I just got a cheep flash and Nikon sc-28 cord for off camera flash. I want to shoot close up flower pictures hand held. I watched a few videos and did some reading, but still don't fully understand how the flash a low power of say 1/64th freeze the flower movement and provides enough light at say f16 for depth of field. Is it because the flash is close to the lens? How does a shutter speed of 250 of a second affect the picture if any? I will have a small soft box on the flash to make it softer light.
I just got a cheep flash and Nikon sc-28 cord for ... (show quote)


The shutter speed will affect the ambient light exposure and the aperture, flash power, and flash distance determine the exposure of your subject. The movement is frozen because of the short flash duration which is much faster than the shutter speed.
Go to
Mar 7, 2018 20:10:14   #
ltj123 wrote:
I'm just starting to think processing in RAW and have no investment in Adobe, etc. After reading some reviews seems Luminar might be a good option, noting some discussion in past but with MAC platform. So wondering if anyone using Luminar on Windows platform and how's it working (fairly new to Microsoft Windows), I have Windows 10 Pro.

Larry J


I have and run Luminar 2018 on windows and it works fine for me. All tools are not available yet but are supposed to be coming to get it up to date with the MAC version. I also have "ON1 Photo RAWb 2018.1" and I find it to be better and with far more capabilities. It now, with version 2018.1, even has thering capabilities if you use a Nikon or Canon camera. It costs a little more but if I was only going to get one of them I would recommend the "ON1 Photo RAW 2018.1".
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 16:45:51   #
PW4GDF wrote:
Hello All. I know there are many ways to change color images to black and white. I use Photoshop 7 and would like any input on the best way to do this.
Thanks.


If you have Nik plugins you can try the "Silver Efex Pro" plugin. It does a good job. I don't have Photoshop 7 installed any longer but I did use the Nik plugins with it. The Google Nik collection as far as I know is still free so you should be able to download them. Other than that you can try converting the picture to grayscale and then work on it with levels and/or curves adjustments.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 16:33:58   #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
I'm taking my wife to the big flower show in Philadelphia and I'm trying to decide on which camera to bring. Usually I take one of my Canon DSLR'S with my EF 28-300L mounted. This year, for a few reasons, I've decided not to. My wife was recently the victim of someone who was in a big hurry and apparently is color blind or wasn't paying attention to the traffic lights and on coming traffic. Long story short, my wife will be in a wheel chair and I don't feel like carrying the big Canon lens on my shoulder while pushing a wheel chair.
I'm quite fond of the coverage and versatility of the 28-300 so instead of the Canon white elephant I'm going to take my smaller lighter Nikkor 28-300. Problem is I need to decide on which camera to bring. Which body will give me better results with the indoor lighting in the Pennsylvania convention center, my D7200 or my D500? I don't plan on using a flash but I will have an SB-400 in my pocket if needed.
I'm taking my wife to the big flower show in Phila... (show quote)


Both will do a good job, but I'd recommend that you take the D500.
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 21:46:48   #
Gene51 wrote:
You say that like it's a negative thing. Paying for the software, whether you pay for it monthly, annually, or initially and then later for upgrades - it's all the same. Photoshop CS Extended used to cost $900 and Lightroom $150, and Ps upgrades were $150 and Lr upgrades were $80. The $10/mo or $120/yr is a total bargain and my software is always up to date. Who wouldn't want to pay the new pricing and get the value compared to the"old" way?



For someone that feels they always have to have the absolute newest version and all the updates even if a lot are things you don't and may never use, then it would be a good idea to pay the $10.00 per month. Not everyone is that way. In my case, I used Photoshop 7 until I decided to update to Photoshop CS3 and then for the last time to Photoshop CS6. I used Lightroom 2 until I decided to update to Lightroom 5. In all cases, I find there were improvements but none of them important enough for me to be constantly updating to a new version. I have no need for new camera definitions if I don't have, use or plan to buy any of the new cameras covered by the new version. I am retired and I don't need or want any unnecessary ongoing expenses. I still have my Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 5.7 that I can use if and when I want and without continuing to pay for it every month. So it isn't a matter of the $10 per month being too much to pay, it is just an unnecessary expense. With good replacements available that we can just buy outright like "Affinity Photo", "Luminar 2018" and "ON1 Photo RAW 2018" we aren't stuck with everlasting payments. For those that think the monthly fee is a good deal and want to use it that's fine, enjoy. Rather than paying a fee to use Photoshop I would rather just buy Photoshop Elements which I have done before.
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 18:49:51   #
Soans Pics wrote:
I would live to hear from those of you who are experienced in using these editing programs. I am trying decide which one to use.


Unless you want to pay a monthly fee to use Adobe Photoshop & Lightroom, I would recommend just buying "Affinity Photo", "ON1 Photo RAW 2018", "Photoshop Elements" or "Luminar". Gimp is also available as a free editor.
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 17:14:24   #
lianetdiaz wrote:
Hi to all,

As you might already know South Florida is very sunny and humid. Normally I go out to take some pictures at daytime around 9 Am to 10 Am. The sun is already strong at that time and often I loose details on the images because of the highlights. This happens mostly with the sky. Unfortunately, currently that is the only time I can go out to take pictures as I have small children. Do you have any tips or advice to deal with this? Sometimes I underexpose a little to gain some details on the sky and I open later the shadows during processing. Is this a viable solution or this is completely wrong?
Hi to all, br br As you might already know South ... (show quote)


I would try using neutral density filters or bracket your shots to ensure having detail throughout your finished picture. If you are not shooting in RAW, and have it available, try shooting either straight "RAW" or "RAW + JPG" and use a tripod.
Go to
Feb 17, 2018 21:08:56   #
jdub82 wrote:
In the process of ordering prints from Bay Photo, there is a box to check to opt out of color correction (or enhancement) on your prints. They will do this automatically unless you check the box that you don't want color correction. This is my first time ordering from them. I am a bit apprehensive, as I really like the photos the way they look electronically after post processing. There are several threads recommending Bay Photo, but I haven't found any specifically about their color enhancement. Are there any UHH members who have experience using color correction with a lab such as Bay Photo? Do you recommend allowing their people to do the color correction?
In the process of ordering prints from Bay Photo, ... (show quote)


I haven't used Bay Photo but I would imagine that you would want to opt out of the color correction if you are processing your pictures on a calibrated monitor. If your monitor isn't calibrated you probably should allow them to do color correction. If your monitor isn't calibrated there is a very good chance that printed photos from just about anywhere will probably not match what you are seeing on your monitor.
Go to
Feb 17, 2018 21:00:35   #
Designdweeb wrote:
I have thousands of CDs backing up more than a decade of my photo assignments from my Windows computers at my previous job. We are all Apple at home. Some of the CDs I can read, most, it seems, I can't. Is there a software solution to get my IOS to recognise the Windows CD format, folders and psds and jpgs, or do I have to buy a cheap Windoze CPU and create a network? Installing a Windows OS would probably choke this old Mac beast, although I do have 16 gigs Ram, and several external HDs. Are there any inexpensive recommendations for a Windows computer that might be easier?
Thanks, Adam
I have thousands of CDs backing up more than a dec... (show quote)


I don't think there is any difference when it comes to JPG, TIF, RAW, PDF or PSD files. I have a number of windows machines which I use most of the time and I also have a "MacBook Pro". Several friend have windows or MACs and we use each others photo CD/DVDs all the time and have never had any problem with and type of photo file or PDFs.
Go to
Feb 17, 2018 20:48:06   #
ron james wrote:
anybody members using SKYLUM - i am newbie and been thinking of signing up for lightroom or indeed a similar program and been looking at various programs but rather than monthly fee so SKYLUM would be prefered if it would suit as i would prefer to buy a program as a 1 off- i do have Adobe photoshop CS3 but i will be 1st to admit i find that my skill level isnt great .


I have and use "Skylum Luminar" (windows version) as well as "ON1 Photo RAW 2018" and Like both. I also have, and use, "Affinity Photo" as a replacement for Photoshop. If you are leaning toward Luminar and are running windows you need to know that the Windows version is not yet complete. Skylum is working on it and putting missing components in as they become ready but it will be a little while before the windows version has all of the MAC version components. Neither version has a DAM available at this time, but one is supposed to be coming soon. I generally find that I use the "ON1 Photo RAW 2018" much more than Luminar. If I want to work in more of a Photoshop type environment, I use "Affinity Photo". At this time I would recommend "ON1 Photo RAW 2018" and/or "Affinity Photo". If you are running a MAC, the Luminar is good now and will get the DAM free as soon as it is ready to go.
Go to
Feb 15, 2018 18:32:50   #
EricAChung wrote:
Needs opinions on it use..... like when best to use and is it worthwhile?
Eric


Use them all the time. Essential if you want the ability to get the absolute most out of your shots. If you feel you need JPG either shoot in "NEF + JPG" or use a program like "Instant JPG from RAW" to extract the JPG from the NEF file.
Go to
Feb 15, 2018 18:23:27   #
ramseynet wrote:
All else being equal, what is more important to you in a camera body: an articulating screen or weather sealed ?


Definitely weather sealed.
Go to
Feb 13, 2018 15:56:48   #
BebuLamar wrote:
Among the UHH members who started out using manual mode either by choice or because that was the only mode that was available at the time. How long did it take you to learn how to use it?
Among those who started out with one of the auto mode (full Auto, P, A or S) how long did it take you to learn how to use the camera in manual?
I am not Chris T but I can still ask survey question can I?


My first camera when I was about 9, was a plastic snapshot camera with just a knob to advance the 620 roll film and a shutter button. Then in Jan. or Feb. 1964 my grandfather bought me a 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 Press Camera with all of it's attachments a cable release, a lightmeter and a tripod so it was manual all the way. I had the booklet what came with the camera and lightmater so I read them and taught myself how to shoot with a manual camera. I was fairly comfortable with the lightmater and camera within about a month or a little less. My next camera was an Argus C3 "Brick" that I bought in 1965. I shot all manual until I bought my first digital camera in Jan. 2002, a Sony Mavica FD92 which was pretty much all Auto. I bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D3100, specifically to get back to being able to shoot in manual again.
Go to
Feb 9, 2018 17:30:59   #
bkyser wrote:
Or handheld meter.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 97 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.