You hit it on the head. How true.

First there was Mattie now there is Pepperosa. So similar in action, verbiage and posture that most feel it is one and the same Troll. This aberration feeds on the ire and discomfort it is able to inflict on others. It (I can only guess gender since it has not declared itself) is a purported Obama hater. Although I will most likely (at this point in time) not vote to re elect, I do not hate the man. Nor do I give a damn where he was born. I would take an effective and strong leader from wherever he came. I believe the birther provision to be bad law.

The coward of UHH however gets his jollies off disrupting our forum. "It" contributes absolutely nothing. Not even healthy dissention. I say that because I know people on both sides of the issues discussed here, revile "it". No one is hard up enough for an ally to embrace "it". Yet members argue with "it" as though "it" had a rational functioning thought process.

"It" is too unsocialized to understand that the way to win friends and infuluence people is to reason with them. Rather "it" chooses to insult, denigrate, profane and dismiss as incompetent, anyone who does not agree with "it" while incessantly ranting the same message declaring how stupid people are who will not bother to view a video in the link "it" has been ranting about and trying to shove down peoples throat.

A link to a video about a birther investigation by sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County AZ. A person I have been intimately aware of since 1992. A blustering, publicy hounding blow hard who has cost our county over 50 million dollars in insurance award claims for wrongfuls deaths of prisoners in his custody. A violator of civil rights. (Read Bull Conner type). To appreciate the inhumane transgressions of Mr. Arpaio, one must realize that nearly 90% of his prisoners are so, not for heinous crimes but misdemeanor violations. DWI's, bad checks, petty theft, drugs, etc. Not violent threats to the public at large. He is an egomaniacal 84 year old relatively insignificant individual who through a crafty public relations department is able to garner press while neglecting the enforcement of real criminal complaints such as the ignoring of over 400 (yes 400) complaints of sexual or child abuse matters, an issue of current criticism and investigation by higher authority.

Where am I going with this? Here: I believe that in order to preserve sanity and objectivity in our Chit Chat forum we must reject that which calls itself "Pepperosa" or "Mattie". A cowardly aberration which declares not it origin, its domicile, its background, its education, its occupation or profession, its location or anything at all. An aberration which is vile, profane, insulting, perverse. There are other adjectives but why? "It" is what "it" is and "it" is undesirable. The only possible legitimate excuse for "It's" behavior is Tourette's Syndrome and that only manifests itself in speech, not writing.

I am against sanctioning anyones right to free speech but "it" makes a mockery out of the first amendment. "It is violent, visceral, vituperative and disruptive of our efforts to conduct meaningful dialog. Lets sign in below with a straight up or down vote as to whether or not we care to tolerate "it". If you are a thumbs up you will be casting a vote to reject "it" and purge "it" from our midst and believe the best remedy is to ignore "it" by not responding in any way to any of "its" posts. If you feed the monster "it" will thrive. Let's kill this poison. It contributes not to free speech or thought. "It is the pariah of hate and bigotry. Lets purge "it" from our midst. "It" has overstepped all bounds of decency.

Remember: Thumbs up is to purge "it".