You are probably splitting hairs again. I used the term to describe, for example, his cancellation of the trip to Denmark after being told his idea of buying Greenland is absurd. I would include his escalating tariffs against China after they raise tariffs on the US (“Whoa, you can’t do that to me? I can do that to you but you can’t try to protect your economy using the same tactic; that’s just not fair.” [Note:not an actual quote, but a sentiment.] There have been plenty of reports of Trump being furious about issues with his staff, if you care to check it out. Of course, you would just say “f**e news,” right?

Bigotry and r****m have made America Great Again. It doesn't take much prompting for so many to get their robes out of the closet and light their Tiki torches. My absolute favorite is the "Oh, I'm not a N**i, you and your Democratic pals are N**is!" response. It worked a lot better back on the playground, but trying to associate Fred Phelps and company with modern day democrats while stating that Muslims are evil seems just a bit of a stretch. Oh well, if you suck up enough Faux Snooze, facts just don't seem to matter.

There does seem to be a distinct shortage of actual reading or reading comprehension among the Hitler Jugend and Epoch Times crowd, but that certainly shouldn't surprise me.

You may return to your Wizardry without further comment from me.

What you, "see" is not science.
What I asked is when?
Does it become human at the moment of fertilization, or the moment of a heartbeat, or the moment of it breathing, or the moment of ejaculation?
What science do you have or do you rely upon to determine your hypothesis?
I believe that science agrees that it becomes a human when it is viable. Viable means that it can survive outside the womb. So at 6 weeks, it cannot and thus it is not human.
As to your allegation that a baby can be aborted right up until birth, that's simply a lie. There is no state in the United States that allows a healthy baby to be aborted at 9 months. (Full stop).
Finally, I would add that you Wingers aren't pro-life. You're simply pro-birth. Once the baby is born, you don't want to feed it, shelter it or pay for its education. Usually, the next time that unwanted child will hear from any of you is when they turn 18 so you can send them off to fight for the oil companies and possibly die for profit.
So please don't give me that holier than thou bs. You wingers are evil, right from the getgo.

And there is the rub, eh? You don't know the answer yet you whine and cry because you SAY Conservatives are doing nothing. But you haven't told us what Liberals are doing. So in your mind you are pushing the narrative the Conservatives don't give a s**t about Brazil but Liberals do care. 20 million dollars is nothing but chicken feed to rich people even on the Liberal side. Pelosi, Schumer, Feinstein, any one of the Clintons could pay that 20 million in a heart beat. Yet they don't. Surely if Liberals cared one bit about Brazil and the fires they could take a collection in the Left side of Congress and send Brazil a check. But they don't which indicates to me Liberals don't care either. Your whining and complaining is for nothing but show. Look at what we are thinking someone should do. Ohhh No No, not us but somebody should really do something don't you think??? THAT my friend is what Liberals are famous for, telling others what they should do according to what Liberals think.

Let me ask you how you would feel if America had a forest fire and someone from Germany, without asking, flew over the fire and put it out. Would you not wonder WTH these people were doing interfering in America's business? Has anyone asked Brazil what they think? Doesn't Brazil have 20 million dollars to put out the fire IF they want it put out? You see these little questions pop up in my head about Brazil's answers to these questions.

Dennis

Historically, the conservatives are the ones that go to war (unless of course you have a bone spur). You're absolutely right! The liberals would be the ones to offer a solution. I don't think folks on a photography group are the ones to provide answers but there are groups that specialize in these things. Maybe use the 20 million to get more tankers, fire r****dant, hire additional fire fighters etc. THEN stop clear cutting. I don't know the answer but I do know that doing nothing is NOT a solution.

Just what do you watch Dennis? I think putting OUT the fires is the big concern. Trump did not even attend the G7 meeting on the environment so I guess there's no problems with the planet. And I guess the rest of the G7 that agreed to donate 20 million to COMBAT the fires are being taken in by the evil liberal agenda. Those damn liberals want to put out an average number of fires? How dare they! Let's clear cut more of the rain forest so there won't be as much to burn! And just think of the money to be made....

And once again folks the Liberal speaking voice is coming out. Nobody said the fires are not a problem. Nobody is suggesting that we (Brazil) keep on burning. Nobody said there is no need to worry. Nobody said it is OK since the rain forest has been burning for years and everything is fine. Nobody said to relax and do nothing. Where do you Liberals get your information you keep spreading around like manure in a field?

Why do you continue to make things up just to make it SEEM that Conservatives don't want to do anything and are always on the bad end of conservation and the environment? Oh yes I forgot for a moment. The reason is because you on the Left NEED to spread these lies to keep your agenda going. You spread fear every e******n cycle to gain v**es. If you v**e Republican grandma will be pushed over a cliff and have no medical services. If you v**e Republican little girls in black churches in the South will be blown up. If you v**e Republican there will be oil spills all over the planet and so on. That is just exactly what you people do.

Dennis

Dear climate alarmists: We regret to inform you that NASA declared the fires in the Amazon to be ‘close to the average in comparison to the past 15 years’

If you’ve been reading the MSM over the past few days, you’ve been treated to a barrage of coverage over the fires in the Amazon and how what’s going on is a “massive increase And as we told you, politicians and celebs are really, really concerned. But not so concerned with the t***h. . .
As we told you last night, the photo is from 2003: last year”: There’s just one problem with this narrative. NASA, which kind of started all of this when they posted this photo of the fires from space, said this year’s fires are at or below average “if we look back 15 years”: Weird! It’s a totally normal year for fires but everyone is freaking out? What could it be?


Embassy of Brazil in the USA
✔
@BrazilinUSA


Brazil commits a lot of resources to combat forest fires. A recently updated NASA report says that “satellite data indicated that total fire activity across the Amazon basin this year has been close to the average in comparison to the past 15 years”.
https://
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145464/
fires-in-brazil
…

Doesn't take much to verify that this is the t***h. The photos being used are from 16 years ago, and aren't even from the right region of the Amazon. The fires are a problem, but they are not the problem being reported.