Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: FreddB
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 next>>
Feb 20, 2018 11:41:42   #
ELNikkor wrote:
Looks like Tigger's face in the middle of #3, Water Spirit..


Had to back for another look. I guess I need to work on my observation skills.

BTW - when did they start naming every snow over an inch?
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 11:36:48   #
Get busy livin', or get busy dyin'
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 15:51:23   #
Newsbob wrote:
Maybe you need the extra sharpness of prime lenses.

I’m more concerned with weight, especially when considering airline limits. My zoom lenses work just fine, a 28-300 on my DSLR, and a 24-240 on mirrorless.


How do you like that 28-300 (Nikon, right)? It's on my wish list
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 13:38:59   #
whitehall wrote:
Shooting BIF, I found that having my 7D Mk ii ( with a Tamron 150-600) set AI servo, high speed at 1500, ISO 800 usually takes care of the stability issue, BUT BIF requires waiting around and the rig gets heavy. Has anyone used a chest harness, and if so is there one out there that is better than others for ease of action ( ie the camera does not get. Stuck just when you need it)?

Thanks


there's a post from last evening - "Carrying two DSLR" - several responses mentioned 'Cotton Carrier'; PhotographyJim posted a picture of himself
in action. You might want to check it out
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 09:15:19   #
Yo, Jim
Biathlon is WINTER olympics, not summer
Go to
Feb 18, 2018 20:39:04   #
so - if I'm understanding correctly - the head/pod works when panning at eye level or slightly below, but not when your panning goes vertical

thank you, guys! (speters, MT shooter, Chefnell and Gene51)
Go to
Feb 18, 2018 16:34:13   #
Anyone using a Siriu pano tilt head for sports or bif? Would you recommend it, or does anyone have a better suggestion?
Go to
Feb 18, 2018 16:27:11   #
markngolf wrote:
As usual, your replies are with compassion, sensitivity, complete and without judgement.
Thanks, Bob,
Mark


I like to follow these threads all the way thru to identify which responders to pay attention to, and which to ignore. Just like school teachers, some are willing and more able to work with us slow kids, while others only want the gifted kids in their class.
Go to
Feb 18, 2018 12:06:31   #
Lilypad52 wrote:
Boy did I step in a hornet's nest.

Thank you to all who were and have been patient in answering my questions about well, you know what. (I will not speak its name lest it sparks more controversy. LOL) I do wish I could find a better way to let you know that I did and will continue to read every post on the unspeakable subject, and I am gleaning much from your opinions and expertise. Thank you.

For those who posted less favorable responses due to the subject matter... well, just bless your heart.

Until next time... be blessed y'all.
Boy did I step in a hornet's nest. br br Thank y... (show quote)


Thanks a LOT! ☺
I just had to track down your original post and read the responses. But, that's MY neurosis, not your fault.
In my humble opinion, that's the reason every digital camera needs 2 card slots. Then you would have one version to share with those who just want something "good enough" to mark the occasion (birthday, holiday, whatever), and the other to take on your quest for the grail (Perfection).
As for the responses/reactions; you get everything from your favorite teachers ("The only dumb question is the one you didn't ask") to the arrogant schmuck who insisted you should have memorized the entire text before daring to enter his sacred domain.
Most of the time, what you'll get is not only helpful instruction, but also friendly encouragement. So, enjoy the discussion/debate and the fun of your (our) hobby! 👍
Go to
Feb 17, 2018 10:00:52   #
Brucej67 wrote:
Nice photo, I would open up the shadows just a bit in post processing (but that is just me).


Why? Sometimes shadows are perfect just being shadows
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 19:59:19   #
deanfl wrote:
Thank you for viewing and commenting. I will consider your suggestion on feet crops for the future.


Had a flashback on that one - my wife criticizing the prom and wedding pictures; "You didn't get the shoes!"
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 09:35:43   #
Since you're shooting through the window, the simplest fix for #5 and #6 might just be getting outside and shooting from a different pov. Just something I picked up from several of the more constructive critiques on here. Lot of great (and free) advice to be found here.
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 09:12:30   #
rmalarz wrote:
Why insist on complicating things?
--Bob


A: Because we can

2: Because we're stuck in the house, and not out actually photographing
something.
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 08:54:05   #
That's the great thing about this group, not only do you get answers to your photography questions, you also get critiqued on your spelling, grammar, vocabulary, manners, and so much more. It's a real one-stop shopping site!
Go to
Feb 8, 2018 21:57:24   #
burkphoto wrote:
Use the manufacturer’s recommended inks and PHOTO quality inkjet paper. Install the latest printer driver. Select the correctly matching recommended setting for the paper and ink combo in the driver. Be sure your software is set to let the printer manage the color.

If using a third-party paper, download the correct ICC profile for YOUR printer model, and that exact paper.

Learn to use “Soft Proofing” or “Simulation Profiles” (read the software documentation). They show you, on a calibrated and profiled monitor, a close match to your prints.

The process does take some discipline... and it works quite well when set up correctly.
Use the manufacturer’s recommended inks and PHOTO ... (show quote)


Thanks for the help
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.