Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dsmeltz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 ... 630 next>>
Oct 9, 2014 07:54:22   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Well ya need to stand a little closer!


;-)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol:
Go to
Oct 9, 2014 07:52:35   #
Chris Knight wrote:
We celebrate twenty four years of marriage on the thirteenth of October. After all these years we got to the point that we would save for retirement and spend on anniversary gifts on the big ones. My last was a Tag watch and hers was a diamond anniversary band. The last eight years have been small gifts and dinners out...A few days ago we discussed...AGAIN...no gifts...we would go to a local festival and have a nice dinner that night...This morning while on the deck after shooting the blood moon, she asks me what kind of camera I have. What a strange question at six fifteen in the morning. Then she calls and asks what time I will be home...when I get home she is sitting on the stoop with a guilty look on her face. Bad wife...right...WRONG...she had seen a photo of the moon posted here with a Celestron telescope with a camera adapter...and went to B&H and bought one for me...I will be able to see the rings around Saturn and the rings around DeLane's finger.
We celebrate twenty four years of marriage on the ... (show quote)


Early in my marraige I discovered that the :

"Let's not buy expensive gifts for each other and save for later" rule really meant :

"I am not getting you much, but you better get me sometning nice or I will be sooo sad and disappointed, but if you do get me something nice, you will be rewarded in other ways"

It works for me. :wink:
Go to
Oct 9, 2014 07:47:13   #
boblwest45 wrote:
Here is what I use. If I remember correctly my cost was $.79 for 1/4 lb package.


:thumbup:
Go to
Oct 9, 2014 07:45:04   #
Hohoho wrote:
Are these sigmas?

Thank you!


There is only one 18-35 1.8 and it is Sigma.
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 09:21:50   #
Nikonista wrote:
The File Allocation Table comes from the 1970s and is only found now on floppies, flash drives and thumb sticks snd the like. It is however still supported in its later versions such as FAT32 for compatibility.

Windows does not use FAT as there are much better file systems available these days such as NTFS, but either way amehta is correct in that the disk does not have to be searched to find a particular file - just the index.


Back in the 80's on some (if not all) UNIX machines there was a "Sanity Track." This was before automatic head parking. If the head dropped, it hit the ST. If the ST was sufficiently damaged, the machine could not boot up. But it did give you the following friendly notification:

“Sanity Failure”
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 09:08:07   #
Cdouthitt wrote:
Having owned both (and sold the e-5 last year), the em1 is far superior, and not to mention much, much lighter. However the e5 is still a very well oiled machine, it's just not being supported any more by Olympus.

Back to the em1...
Weather sealing is top notch. I just used it this past weekend in the pouring rain...not intentionally, but had to for the wedding I was shooting. Was really glad it was protected.

I find that adding the boem-1 camera plate makes it fit in my hands perfectly, and the hld7 power grip is a nice to own as well if battery life is a concern.

The lens...oh the lenses. This is one of the amazing things about the m4/3 system. They're so dang small and sharp when compared to their dslr counterparts. Of the ones listed in my bag (In my signature below) the 12-40 and 75mm are my two must have, can't live with out lenses. Add the 7.5 to that and you can cover quite a bit. Add the 25 f1.4 and low light situations become easier to shoot.

Do you still have your old minolta rokkor lenses? If so the em1 has focus peaking that makes shooting with old film lenses a breeze. I like my old pentax lenses. Honestly though it's so tough to beat the native lenses that I rarely use the old film lenses anymore.

If you click on my user name, you'll see my personal website. 90% of the photos taken after December 2013 have been shot with the em1.

Feel free to PM me with any questions about either Olympus setup. I've been shooting solely Olympus since 2007 and have owned quite a few of their lenses and bodies.
Having owned both (and sold the e-5 last year), th... (show quote)


Agree. Mirrorless seems to be the way to go for your needs. And this guy knows his mirrorless. You should consider his advice.

PM him. :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 09:03:55   #
Dngallagher wrote:
Have you looked at Lens Band?

http://lensband.com/store/



I would think those free give away advertizing bracelets (like the one for the charity LiveStrong) they pass out at functions everywhere would also do the trick.

This was on another thread afew minutes ago

redhogbill wrote:
you are correct!! see review from an amazon customer

Most Helpful Customer Reviews...........



9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Yes, it works, but its really just a wrist band.
By 1 Cor 1:18 on May 28, 2012

I bought this band for my 28-135mm Canon lens, I works fairly well and the black blends in well with the lens.
The thing is, all they really are are rubber Wrist Bands that say "Lens Band" on them. When I got it I was disappointed that I had in effect paid 12 bucks(including shipping) for it when I had some laying around the house that I got for free. I actually have a couple that work better.
Nothing against the company, but If you are thinking about buying this lens band, try a rubber wrist band first...
you are correct!! see review from an amazon custom... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 08:59:52   #
redhogbill wrote:
you are correct!! see review from an amazon customer

Most Helpful Customer Reviews...........



9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Yes, it works, but its really just a wrist band.
By 1 Cor 1:18 on May 28, 2012

I bought this band for my 28-135mm Canon lens, I works fairly well and the black blends in well with the lens.
The thing is, all they really are are rubber Wrist Bands that say "Lens Band" on them. When I got it I was disappointed that I had in effect paid 12 bucks(including shipping) for it when I had some laying around the house that I got for free. I actually have a couple that work better.
Nothing against the company, but If you are thinking about buying this lens band, try a rubber wrist band first...
you are correct!! see review from an amazon custom... (show quote)


I thought the bands were only around $5.00. The shipping is more than the band? Geeezzzz :lol:
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 08:57:34   #
manderson wrote:
I know you shouldn't use vibration control on lenses when using a tripod. But what about a monopod? At what point is it necessary? I'm sure that I move somewhat while using the monopod but does it give enough stability that I don't need the v.c.?


It also depends on the lens. Some lenses have a second VR for use on a tripod. I think it counteracts mirror movement.
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 08:55:26   #
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 08:51:04   #
Frank W wrote:
You could buy expensive rubber bands...... Sorry, I didn't mean that. :oops:


Actually you can buy expensive rubber bands.

http://lensband.com/store/

I would think those free give away advertizing bracelets (like the one for the charity LiveStrong) they pass out at functions everywhere would also do the trick.
Go to
Oct 7, 2014 08:45:35   #
Jakebrake wrote:
Good grief, why would you even think about upgrading until the 7D MK II comes out. That would be a true upgrade! And all of your lenses would work. To think about switching to Nikon with the investment you have in lenses alone is absurd in my opinion.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 6, 2014 10:19:39   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Use gaffers tape instead. Electrical tape leaves behind a sticky residue, especially when used in hot weather.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Gaffer's tape all the way. If you are not familiar with it, think of it a duct tape but way more cool.
Go to
Oct 6, 2014 09:09:53   #
jerryc41 wrote:
It's not the brand that's important, it's the particular model lens. Look for comparisons online. Try DxO, articles, and YouTube.

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare


Yes try DxO as PART of you research. Remember that their tests are NOT under field conditions. If you shoot ONLY in studio, they are probably sufficient. If you shoot anywhere else, gather more real world review data.
Go to
Oct 6, 2014 09:01:32   #
juleskarney wrote:
Hello: I had the same question a few weeks ago. Did my homework. I went from a d-90 to d-7100. I have to say I love this camera. It's wonderful.


Is it just me, or is the guy in the first shot facing the wrong way? :wink:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 ... 630 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.