Gene51 wrote:
Donald, the first VR lens I ever got was the Nikon 18-200 (original) back in 2006. I was blown away by being able to handhold a shot at 18 mm for 1 sec and no noticeable motion blur. I did some testing, and found that it had some value, but my results were always better when I used a tripod, but never knew why. After considerable digging around, I found Thom Hogan's article. I realized that I was gaining low frequency movement correction (handheld) but trading off high frequency correction - that came mostly from shutter and optical element movement (during focus acquisition), which most VR/VC/OS systems cannot sense and respond to quickly enough. I have gotten other lenses since then, with upgraded "tripod ready" stabilization systems, but the results didn't change much. Limiting the movement correction to one axis helps when panning on a tripod or monopod, but it still steals sharpness - which is really evident with images taken with my D800s. When there is a chance of blur from camera movement, I just take out the big tripod - and that fixes the problem. It may not always be convenient, so plan B usually involves ISO 1600 or higher, along with a fast lens - F2.8 or faster for shorter focal lengths, and F4 for the big boys. Motion blur has ceased to be a major issue for me. It's still there but my keeper percentage is higher.
Donald, the first VR lens I ever got was the Nikon... (
show quote)
I have only 2 lenses with VR, will give shooting non-VR with them a real try and see what happens....