Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: davesit
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24 next>>
Sep 30, 2020 11:29:57   #
markngolf wrote:
Cool!! I have it and thousands of others on flash drives for my car listening. I don't think Rachmaninov wrote anything other than beautiful.

Thanks,
Mark


I digitized my hundreds of CD's many years ago and they all fit in a 128GB flash drive that I use in our cars. Isn't technology great? Sure beats carrying 10 CD's at a time in those awful cases.
Go to
Sep 30, 2020 11:19:15   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The relatively new Z50 is 21MP of cropped sensor mirrorless glory! Review: https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/mirrorless/z50.htm


Go to
Sep 30, 2020 11:09:44   #
I was just listening to this concerto a couple of days ago in the car satellite radio. I also love his third piano concerto, a more technical and difficult concerto to play for the soloist.

Thanks for sharing.
Go to
Sep 24, 2020 12:26:09   #
CO wrote:
Tamron's latest lenses are great. I like that they are fully weather sealed including a weather seal at the lens mount. Check out the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 G2 lens.


Go to
Sep 23, 2020 11:08:21   #
Bamboo618 wrote:
I'm trying to photograph the migrating swallows that come through Old Lyme every year. I have a 200-400 lens on a Canon Rebel. Any advice as to the settings? They are most active as the sun is going down and move quickly. Thanks!


Shutter speed is crucial for photographing small and very fast birds such as swallows. I would suggest 1/3200 or faster.
Go to
Sep 9, 2020 12:48:22   #
If you think you don't need to AF Fine-Tune your lenses, you are not optimizing the capability of your lenses.

I just spent days going through my 15 Nikon F-mount lenses with FoCal, a semi-automatic program to calibrate the AF Fine-Tune of lenses with my 3 FF Nikon bodies - D5, D850 and Z7.

Even though the Z7 does have an AF Fine-Tune feature available, I found none of the F-mount lenses required any adjustments, as they all fall within +- 2.

On the D5 and D850 however, the adjustments ranged from -17 to +5. FoCal gives up a before and after picture comparison and I could clearly see a difference when the adjustment is 3 or higher.

And the issue is more complicated than that. The Fine-Tune adjustment is just one number which applies to all distances and focal lengths (if it's a zoom lens). With Sigma and Tamron lenses that are attached to a dock, there are multiple AF adjustments to the lens. On my Tamron 35-150, there are 18 adjustment points - 6 on focal lengths (35, 50, 85, 105, 135 and 150) and 3 distances (3', 6' and infinity). Those 18 adjustments were not consistent. They ranged from -4 to +2. But on my Nikkor 24-70 F/2.8G, they ranged from -3 and -14 at 6' at focal lengths of 28, 35, 50 and 70mm.

So with just 1 setting (or 2 with the new D780), it is just a setting premised on 1 focal length and 1 shooting distance. It's no wonder why many F-mount lenses become sharper when used with a Z camera.

Many people are perfectly happy without performing any AF Fine-Tune, but they are not getting the best images that the lenses could provide.

The day will come when the Z cameras could auto focus as well as the D850 or D5/6. That's when I will be thinking about selling my D5 and D850.
Go to
Sep 7, 2020 14:19:35   #
FTn wrote:
One of the keys to great photographs is testing, testing, testing. Sure testing your lenses and camera bodies for focus issues takes a little time but after you go thru the process it's done for as long as you own them. Once completed it removes the camera body and lens from the list of possibile causes of images that are out of focus and places them squarely on the shoulders of the photographer.

The good thing the camera body only recommends a correction number. You can repeat the test of each lens several times, average them, and use that number for your correction factor. You can also turn off the correction off at any time if you think that it is hurting your images.

I don't understand why people here seem to be so against focus fine tuning. You can print a focus chart that you find for free on the net and tack it up on any flat surface. The process only costs you some time. Nikon has automated the feature on most of its new cameras so I'm sure that the other major players have done the same. Go ahead and give it a try. It will probably help you as a photographer.

- FTn
One of the keys to great photographs is testing, t... (show quote)


Go to
Sep 7, 2020 14:17:45   #
[quote=whitehall]As always your opinions based on your experience will be much welcome:

Do lenses (300 PF) need to be adjusted for back or front focus?

IGW[/quote

With a few exceptions, I happened to have done a AF fine-tune with my many lenses (yeah, I know) and my 3 bodies (D5, D850 and Z7). The lenses are mostly Nikkors, with a few Sigma and Tamrons. With the DSLR bodies, the AF fine-tune numbers ranges from -17 to +5, but with the Z7, there were all either 0, -1 or -2 (just 1 lens). So I can say that you don't really need to AF fine-tune the lenses with Z camera bodies.

Attached is a pdf file of a spreadsheet showing the AF fine-tune numbers with each of the camera bodies. As you can see, with the Z7, the numbers are so small that it's irrelevant. So there is really no need to AF fine-tune lenses with the Z camera bodies.

Attached file:
(Download)
Go to
Sep 2, 2020 16:58:32   #
It is a very good price with such low shutter actuation count. Good luck with sale.
Go to
Aug 26, 2020 13:15:06   #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Go for picture quality. Picture quality will last forever, while inconvenience will be soon forgotten.


Go to
Aug 25, 2020 12:34:04   #
eagle76sct wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking for some honest feedback and opinions on tripod / monopod combo's. I am considering purchasing one. I have looked at a bunch and I am not sure now if there is one better then the other. I don't have to have carbon fiber but if the price was right would consider it. I am more leaning toward aluminum. I am 5'11" so hgt is consideration. I would like to stay around $150 - $200.
I have a Nikon 5600. My go to lens is a 18-140. I also have a 70-300.

Twist lock legs vs flip lock legs?

One I looked at Vanguard VEO2 235ab Aluminum another was MEFOTO Road trip Aluminum?

I do like the arca type lock system.
I have a befree Manfrotto and just not a fan of it. Maybe because it's the head and it's to small for my camera.

Thank You hogs..
Greetings, br I am looking for some honest feedbac... (show quote)


Combo tripod/monopod sticks pretty much give you mediocre performances for both. Your setup is not that heavy. You don't need a huge tripod to support the weight. In your price range, you can certainly get a decent carbon fiber tripod from Neewer or one of the better Chinese manufacturers, and still have money left to get a Sirui monopod.

Here's one from Amazon:

https://smile.amazon.com/Neewer-Inches-Monopod-Camcorder-Work%EF%BC%8CLoad/dp/B08BJ2DH59/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=neewer+tripod&qid=1598373007&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExOERQV0NZTkYwTlVOJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwNjA5OTA5MzlLOEdFN1NNSjJBWiZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNTc1ODc5MVM0SlhRSEtMMEFSUiZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU=

It is a combo tripod/monopod where one of the legs could be detached and used as a monopod. But as someone else responded, it's a pain in the ass. You are much better off getting separate pods. I bought his tripod for my wife's setup, which is very similar to yours. Just don't bother with the monopod feature and get a separate monopod.
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 11:05:45   #
I think there were firmware issues with early EN-EL15 batteries when used with the D850. Other manufacturers also had the same problem. Later versions seemed to work fine.
Go to
Aug 18, 2020 16:03:10   #
imagemeister wrote:
ANY "travel tripod" is mostly NOT a good fit for a 750 with 200-500 lens ! This is the closest thing to a travel tripod that you should be looking at - or one with similar specs - https://www.ebay.com/itm/Leofoto-LS-365C-LS365C-Professional-Carbon-Fiber-Tripod-camera-Compact-tripod/173497892886?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l9372
.


Go to
Aug 11, 2020 11:39:24   #
I had both and sold the 200-500 after getting the 500PF. There is no comparison in quality at the long end of the range.

Frankly, I find pretty much all of the times that even 500mm is not long enough for wildlife. I also have the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 if I am fortunate enough to be closer to my subject.
Go to
Aug 8, 2020 11:16:47   #
Perfect study in B&W.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.