Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: EyeShootWideOpen
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 56 next>>
Mar 9, 2019 09:14:48   #
I have been a fan of Kelly Robitaille since I discovered her work years ago...this is my first time trying to put together my take on her style. I love her whimsical, dramatic, creative style. I thought about sharing the original and inviting others to try but I was so excited to try the edit that I couldnt wait. I plan to do a series...I have some other ideas in mind.

Please share your thoughts, especially if you see something I can improve. I tried the frequency separation method and I can never figure out the texture part. Also, dodging and burning pointers would be helpful for more of a painterly look.


(Download)
Go to
Mar 9, 2019 09:04:30   #
I am so thankful to everyone who contributed to this feed. Y'all have kept me pretty busy googling artists that I was not familiar with and viewing galleries that were absolutely stunning.

I just wanted to share...yesterday I took a little time out of my tax prep work and shot a picture so I could try doing a Kelly Robitaille style image, but make it my own. I spent about 4 hours late last night on the edit and posted it to a Facebook group and SHE commented on my photo!! I love her brilliantly creative mind and her editing skills are pretty amazing, some of her work is darker than what I tend to do but her talent is pretty impressive none-the-less. So I am pretty happy at the moment! And I am really happy with my first try also. I had issues with the frequency separation and dodge and burn parts but the rest of it, I think, came together pretty well. Excited to get better and experiment more with this style. I was thinking about sharing it in the post processing area for some suggestions on improvements, and help with the fs and d&b...
Go to
Mar 9, 2019 08:50:09   #
Jolly and Cameraf4, Great additions to this feed! Thanks for sharing.
Go to
Mar 9, 2019 01:09:29   #
Rolk wrote:
Sure, no problem, Diane.

First hit the "download" message under the image, and then when
it loads, if you move your mouse or cursor over the image, your
cursor should turn into a plus sign...when it does, keep it on the
image and click again. The image will get huge and you'll be able
to scroll around and really enjoyed the fine detail, especially in
these images.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Tim


Ok, thank you. So like zooming in after download? I did that without realizing that is what I was doing...it was pretty spectacular to see the detail. Wow! And thanks again for explaining.
Go to
Mar 8, 2019 21:11:06   #
rusty nails wrote:
The spring nest building and mating is in full swing


Beautiful captures!
Go to
Mar 8, 2019 21:10:22   #
Rolk wrote:
Actually, double download is even better...you could spend
a ton of time just moving over the image...Love it!
Tim

PS - This person is not a con artist; he's created tons
of DIFFERENT pieces of work. It's okay if you don't like
something, but why is it alright in our society to verbally
abuse someone...???


May I ask what double download is? I am clueless. Thanks, Rolk.
Go to
Mar 8, 2019 21:08:16   #
kcooke wrote:
Just getting around to looking at the photographs I took at the Chihuly Glass Exhibition at Biltmore Mansion in September 18. Here is one from the lawn outside the front of the mansion. Please download to see the incredible detail!


Wow, that is incredible!
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 21:07:02   #
Horseart wrote:
Lovely!!!


Thank you Jo.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 18:39:08   #
kymarto wrote:
Here are some examples shot on crop sensor with a Sigma 8-16 @8mm (or Nikon 14-24 on FF) that might be similar to what you are referring to.


Beautiful images. I have the Sigma 15 2.8 and have yet to learn to compose shots like these with it.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 18:20:31   #
Wanda Krack wrote:
Thanks for the explanation.


You are very welcome.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 13:29:17   #
Szalajj wrote:
Bokeh is one thing, as long as at least something is in focus in your shot.

But in the shot with the gazebo, fence, and pink flower, nothing is in focus.

Decide upon your primary subject, and ensure that it's in sharp focus, then work on your other settings to blur the surroundings.

Some lenses will lend themselves to better quality Bokeh results than others.

The lower the f-stop number, the wider open your lens will be, giving you a narrow or shallow depth of field. It's that shallow depth of field that will give you an enhanced bokeh background and foreground.

Using the aperture priority setting on your camera will get you there the fastest, but experimenting with the manual setting will teach you how the combinations of settings will get you to your desired effect without having to resort post processing special effects.
Bokeh is one thing, as long as at least something ... (show quote)


Thank you. I am still learning and one of the reason I have been taking out lenses I do not use as much. I typically grab my 24-105 which lowest is F4. I do find that I have the tendency to miss the mark with my settings when I grab the primes, misjudging the focal plane area. I once found a really great site, dofsimilator.net, which I need to go spend some time at with my lens selection before I head out to shoot. I will go back and try to improve the shot you mention! Thanks again.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 12:10:29   #
Earnest Botello wrote:
Very good set, Diane.


Thank you, Earnest.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 12:09:42   #
Wanda Krack wrote:
Just curious, how did you process the fire hydrant shot? It stood out to me. Looks like a fun walk.


Aside from the standard adjustments in LR or raw, I took the photo into one of the Topaz filters. Sorry, I cannot remember exactly which one was used. I wanted a softer look for the surrounding foliage. I may have masked or reduced when back in PS. Hope that helps, sorry I cant be more specific. I edit experimentally by each individual photo based on how I envision it when I took it...and there are always happy accidents as well.
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 12:03:58   #
cameraf4 wrote:
Judging by your moniker, Diane, are you always a fan of very shallow Depth-of-Field? After a while, my eyes start to water.


I like big bokeh, I cannot lie. Ok, just a little fun there. I would say often what I shoot does require some element of blur in the background. The moniker was taken from a T-shirt that I own and happened to be wearing when I found/signed onto UHH. So, for lack of something more creative it was more of a steal but I switched out the I for Eye.
Go to
Mar 6, 2019 18:38:45   #
SpyderJan wrote:
That's dedication. It is always hard when one doesn't make it.


I felt bad, but the others would not have survived if I had not cared for them, so I felt good too.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 56 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.