Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: khorinek
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32 next>>
Sep 12, 2019 07:52:39   #
Capn_Dave wrote:
Here is an old post of mine telling you about my first time cleaning the sensor:

I am with the majority and clean my own sensor. I'm an outdoor photographer in Florida. High humidity blowing sand we got it all. I will try to find shelter when changing lenses but sometimes that's impossible.
I had read and seen videos on the net about cleaning the sensor. I decided to give it a whirl pearl.
I was like a virgin on prom night. This was my first time and really nervous. I brushed and blew the outside of my camera off. Then removed the lens and took the Rocket Blower and shot a couple of blasts of air inside the camera. I put the lens back on went outside and took some pictures of the sky. Back inside I went downloaded the pictures and, nope spots still there mostly in the different places. I repeated the first couple of steps and then got the Rocket Blower out again and then I fired up the Artic Butterfly. I looked into the camera and stared at the (what everybody calls the sensor but is a plate over it) and with a shaking hand wiped the sensor in one direction and then the other. My heart was pounding like crazy, I could hear it in my ears. I put the camera back together and headed outside once more to shoot the sky. I then came back in downloaded the pictures and low an behold I was down to 3 spots. Here we go I know the third time is the charm Mr. Murphy loves threes, this was it the do it or die moment. Brushed off the camera took off the lens, hit the sensor with the Rocket Blower, hit the sensor with the Artic Butterfly. Now I opened the package of sensor swabs. I am starting to shake. Each swab is packed in a cellophane package. I fumble to get the package open, I am holding the swab in one hand, trying not to touch anything with it and knowing there are humongous particles flying around inside my house. The particles look like balls with diamond spikes sticking out and they are slamming into that swab, just waiting to scratch the hell out of my sensor. I open the bottle of sensor cleaner, and by now I am shaking like a canary trying to pass a peach seed, I gingerly try to get two drops of solution onto the swab. I empty about a quarter of the bottle on my hand and arm but do manage to finally get the couple of drops on the swab. Look out camera I going in. I notice the swab fits perfectly on the sensor, I swipe one way then the other, I remove my trembling hand, drop the swab, slap a lens on, light up a cigarette (I don't smoke) poured a glass of single malt scotch, and go outside to take pictures of the sky once more. Upon checking this time, Wahoo, no spots. Piece O' cake.
After that fiasco I bought a sensor loupe so I could look and see if any crud was on the sensor.

I clean my sensor about 3 to 4 times a year and just do it. No shaking, no sweats, and like the Virgin on prom night, I stop and think "Is that all there is?"
Here is an old post of mine telling you about my f... (show quote)


That was well written and funny. I still prefer to pay the $50 to have my sensors cleaned.
Go to
Sep 11, 2019 07:50:36   #
I have my cameras cleaned by a professional camera shop.
Go to
Sep 11, 2019 07:45:26   #
Fabulous1too wrote:
I have a Canon 5D mk3, I have several lenses including a 17-44mm f4, a fixed 50mm f1.2, a 24-70mm f2.8, and a 70-200mm f28. A friend of mine is selling a 24-105mm f4 at a really good price, $450, do i really need this lens? Thanks in advance hoggers.


If it is the original version, I would say no, or at least take it out and try it. The original version of this lens was soft from 80mm to 105mm. I had this lens and mine was not a good copy. The focal range makes it a good all around lens, but if it takes bad photos that won't matter. You already have all you need in the 24-70 and 70-200.
Go to
Sep 10, 2019 07:26:37   #
I use K (kelvins) white balance and adjust as needed. Also you may need to use continuous lighting, that way you get what you see, as apposed to a strobe.
Go to
Sep 9, 2019 09:00:21   #
sb wrote:
Consider the new Canon EOS RP. Full-frame mirrorless. Not as great a camera as the 5D Mk IV, but it is also only $1100. With the adapter you can use any Canon EF or EF-s lens.


I use the EOS RP. I switched from the Mark III and Mark IV. I do use my Mark IV for some sports as it is faster fps than the EOS RP but the image quality is as good as the Mark IV and the camera weighs half as much. I use my 70-200 f/4 and 70-200 f/2.8 on it with great results. I believe Canon has made a big statement with the mirrorless R and RP cameras. My experience with Best Buy is they hire high school kids to sell their products and the kids are not that familiar with the real world products, just what they are told in the store. IMHO.
Go to
Sep 7, 2019 08:10:40   #
roy4711 wrote:
I do not understand iso settings could someone explain it to me I am and amature.


I tell my students, ISO (International Standards Organization) is "artificial light" applied to the image. The higher the ISO number the more "light" you will see in the photo, which makes what's in the photo more visible to the viewer.
Go to
Sep 6, 2019 07:35:20   #
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-EOS-80D-24-2MP-Body-Xlnt-Cond-SUPER-LOW-SHUTTER-COUNT-784-FAST-SHIP/202770377453?epid=223367815&hash=item2f360e6aed:g:BJgAAOSwVlVdbgUQ
Go to
Sep 5, 2019 09:35:45   #
I also like the idea of updating the "hardware" as mentioned in this post. Why not update the sensor, or other features that new models my have. My Mark III looks almost identical to my Mark IV. The biggest difference is the internal parts. If you put these two models side by side most people couldn't tell them apart if you covered up the labels. Instead of manufacturing a new model with the new hardware and technology, why not send it in to canon and have a hardware and firmware update?
Go to
Sep 5, 2019 08:32:01   #
That is a great lens! I use mine a lot and it weighs half as much as the f/2.8 model. If you saw the ding in the box before you bought it I would have asked for another one just to be safe, or point out the ding to the clerk when you bought it so they are aware of it. However, I would take it out and try it to see if there are any issues.
Go to
Sep 5, 2019 08:23:59   #
robertjerl wrote:
A part of it is the big name brands cameras are "too good". They reached the MP level for up to 16x20 or so prints long ago and features that are way more than the casual photographer/snap shooter wants or cares to make use of and they are so well built they last a long time. So most of the market is saturated.
New customers often are content with their cell phones.
So they need to cut down on the large line ups of so many models, esp the P&S since those are the ones the cell phones replace. They should concentrate on the best they can produce for the money in say three or at most 4 models (dslr or mirrorless-which ever people want). Beginner, intermediate, high end and a pro level "HOW MUCH DOES THAT THING COST?" In the point and shoots make just a couple of models one that has a better sensor than a cell phone with a good control layout, and one high end one with a great sensor, lens and controls but small enough to go in a pocket for those serious photographers who sometimes want or need a small light camera for "just in case". I carry a nearly antique Panasonic ZS6 in my shirt pocket when I leave the house. Then one very good bang for the buck bridge/superzoom for those who want more than a P&S but don't want to carry or change lenses.
I seem to remember in the late 50s or 60s Nikon made a modular SLR that the pros could swap out things, my two Miranda Sensorex's had a modular view finder, pentaprism and pop it out and slide in a waist level with magnifier. If they even made them so sensors etc could be upgraded that would be great. A lot of people would be more likely to go for a newer sensor or processor instead of buying a whole new camera.
A part of it is the big name brands cameras are &q... (show quote)


I agree! Sometimes manufactures get carried away with trying to appease their entire audience. The point & shoots are/will be replaced with cell phones eventually. Canon (and all camera manufactures) should concentrate their efforts on the needs of the largest group of customers. It took several years for Ford and GMC to figure this out. They sold many models that mirrored each other and became their own competitors, Pontiac, Buick, Saturn, Chevrolet, GMC all made similar models and ended up competing with each other. Ford dropped the Mercury line a few years ago. It's a tough market today and with the tariff war it's going to get tougher.
Go to
Sep 4, 2019 07:14:55   #
connievloutely wrote:
I am looking for some advice on an external hard drive with a capacity of 2 tb.

I have used Seagate and western digital in the past.

what is the current best brand for reliability.

Your thoughts please!


I use Western Digital with no problems. All my external hardrives are 1TB. Iv'e thought about going larger but if you do have one fail, you only lose 1TB of images not 2TB.
Go to
Sep 3, 2019 07:39:58   #
Sark17 wrote:
You’ve got a good memory! Though just a couple of days ago I upgraded to the Canon EOS R (and love it!)!!

What would be recommended for every day use? (non L) EF 24-105 f/3.5-5.6 IS, or sounds like maybe the 18-135? Thank you for your help!


If you have the EOS R, I would recommend an L lens. The EOS R and any L lens are in the same quality arena. Also, I don't believe it was mentioned yet, the biggest difference between the 24-105 f/3.5-5.6 IS and the 24-105 f/4 L IS would be the aperture settings. The f/3.5-5.6 means variable aperture (the aperture changes as you zoom) whereas the f/4 is constant (you can set the aperture and it will stay no matter how far you zoom), good for indoors. The RF 24-105 f/4 L IS would be a good lens for the EOS R. I use this lens on my EOS RP with good results.
Go to
Sep 2, 2019 07:56:56   #
hj wrote:
In another post today several recommended the Canon 80D refurb bundle on Canon's refurb site for $699 and includes two lenses. I'm trying to understand why they have this bundle so inexpensive and yet on the same site the 70D body only is $959 and with an 18-55mm lens $1079. Why is the 70D more expensive than the 80D? I have a mint 70D and thought I should consider the 80D bundle at $699 but now I'm not so sure.


I'm guessing here, the 90D is getting ready to come out soon. When it hits the market, it will make the most recent model, (80D) unwanted/obsolete to photographers that want/need the new model and if they have a lot of stock of the 80D, they want to unload the 80D before the 90D comes out.
Go to
Sep 2, 2019 07:51:03   #
mizzee wrote:
For years I've used LR exclusively because of FOP. I just took Scot Kelby's "Ultimate Photography Crash Course" and expected to learn tips and tricks with taking better photos, which I did learn. But, I got the added bonus of a cure for my FOP! I've taken a number of workshops for Photoshop with no lasting benefit. For some reason, maybe laughter, maybe step-by-step, I'm now able to start using PS. I'm not a paid advocate for Kelby, I just wanted to share my revelation!


I learned a lot from Scott Kelby in a one day session than I ever realized I could. I've read all his books and watched a lot of his videos. He's a great teacher.
Go to
Sep 1, 2019 07:55:20   #
I am not a fan of third party lenses. I believe the extra $$ you pay for a quality Canon/Nikon lens is worth it.

https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/ef-85mm-f-18-usm?searchTerm=85%20mm
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.