Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: sxrich
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21 next>>
Aug 19, 2022 10:11:06   #
https://www.amazon.com/How-Create-Stunning-Digital-Photography/dp/0988263408/ref=asc_df_0988263408/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312057344057&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=16944878467991002863&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9005966&hvtargid=pla-434254677573&psc=1
Go to
Aug 16, 2022 00:58:00   #
You're welcome......good luck!
Go to
Aug 15, 2022 17:05:25   #
Dziadzi wrote:
I use TTL, manual, 1/250, ISO 400.........no flash compensation. Thanks to all of you for your feedback.


I shoot events with a d7100 and d750. Sb700. I also use a Gary Fong Lightsphere (original, non-collapsible). I always bounce the flash regardless of ceiling height to include fill flash outside. Please - no lectures on bouncing outside. Set your metering to Matrix which will give you TTL-BL (TTL - balanced lighting). Don't use spot metering. I usually go with manual, 1/200, f-2.8 to 5.6 depending on situation. Now, I do adjust flash power from the camera (flash button) as TTL isn't always accurate and most times is a little hot, I'm down .7 stop to start. I do turn on my "blinkies". I can't afford to blow highlights in a wedding dress. I'm usually at iso 200-400. Depending on distance to subject, I'll go iso 800. I never point my flash directly at a subject. This approach has worked for me. Here are some pics, inside and outside fill flash.












Go to
Jul 26, 2022 12:24:30   #
JD750 wrote:
I have an 85mm, f1.8 and I use it for portraiture. It’s great for that.

So a question for those who have a fast 85mm lens, what do you use it for?


I have the Nikon 85 1.8g - shoot it on a Nikon d750. Value wise, superb. I've also tested it extensively in different scenarios from close-up, to portraiture to events. My views may be different that others. Strengths: reasonably priced, very sharp, nice saturation. Weaknesses" Shooting an event, inside (50 people) in a rented hall, 60th birthday party - I took it off my camera! Went with my Nikon 24-70 2.8 nonVR. It wouldn't lock focus in low ambient light, low contrast images (people dancing with lights turned down). Too slow - when capturing moments is important. Then, another event. Wedding venue grand opening - invitation to wedding photographers - shooting a model, ambient light, close range with focus point on closest eye - AGAIN, struggling to lock focus. In nice bright light, it's great. I've also done close-up with it - very good. I don't adhere to "fill the frame" as your depth of field is reduced severely and I want both eyes in focus. If I want close up, I'll shoot my Tokina 100mm 2.8. Bottom line, a portrait lens that is a good one. But, it's still just a tool. Because of the 1.8, artistic. Compared to the Nikon 85 1.4, image rendition more 3d with the 85 1.4. Here are some pics.










Go to
Jul 25, 2022 19:52:54   #
PAR4DCR wrote:
The three things in the above image: baby, nurse and all of the medical machines.

Don


Yep, you nailed it
Go to
Jul 25, 2022 10:50:31   #
Wicker wrote:
Thanks for introducing me to John Free. It has been a long long time since I look a hard look at what I have been shooting and what I've been looking at. John Free has openen my mind to what I have been doing without really thinking. He has put into words the elements of images I've been working on. I now see what works and what doesn't in my photos. What is kept and what is cut out has always been a hard choice. I just took a look at images I've recently edited and now understand why it works, as it has a story to tell.
Thanks for introducing me to John Free. It has bee... (show quote)


(Download)
Go to
Jul 25, 2022 10:44:57   #
dustie wrote:
••quote•• He told me his grandfather is sufferg from dementia and has forgotten his entire past and does not recognize anyone in his entire family. Of course, I sympathised but thought to myself "now I have something to look forward to"! ••quote••

Not to discourage you....I do understand the point you have in your "SICK sense of humor", as you referred to it. However, be aware, there is no certainty that the things you desperately want to forget will also be purged from your memory if you should fall victim to the effects of alzheimers/dementia.

I have friends and have worked some around those who are afflicted with this.

One fellow in particular comes to mind when reading your comment. On some of his worst days, his troubles were so connected to the flooding of memories and disturbing things from the past that he was very combative, uncooperative and angry against the caregivers who were supposed to assist him, and he was bound and determined that they only meant to do him irreparable harm.
In a somewhat odd way, we found out that at those times he did not actually recognize me as an employee of that facility, but he thought I was a former co-worker of his from his working years 40 or so years ago who had come to visit him.
We found we could get him calmed down for a while if everyone else would just leave his room and let me put my work duties aside for a while, then just sit and visit with him playing along that I was a former co-worker and we could reminisce about the good old days on the job back then.
It varied from episode to episode how effective that calming would remain when it reached the point I really had to leave his room to return to my duties. Sometimes he remained pretty calm, happy I was a person from the past who had taken the time to make a trip to visit him.
Other times, he returned to his agitated anger when I had to excuse myself to leave his room, because he 'knew' then that I was 'just like them' and did not really mean him well, otherwise I would get him out of there instead of leaving him there 'with them'.

It can be very bitter/sweet sometimes being related to and/or working around those whose brain is suffering the ravages of aging, disease and horrible memories.

Best of wishes to you.
••quote•• He told me his grandfather is sufferg... (show quote)


"Vanity"...........https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1U3MyX0pmE
Go to
Jul 25, 2022 10:00:24   #
MrMophoto wrote:
Autofocus, nice set
For those who object to the term "rules", remember it's only a word.
Let's call them "compositional suggestions"


So funny.........Forget "Mother", let's call her "birthing parent"!!!!! Offended????? Throw away your camera and protest!
Go to
Jul 25, 2022 09:28:40   #
Wicker wrote:
Thanks for introducing me to John Free. It has been a long long time since I look a hard look at what I have been shooting and what I've been looking at. John Free has openen my mind to what I have been doing without really thinking. He has put into words the elements of images I've been working on. I now see what works and what doesn't in my photos. What is kept and what is cut out has always been a hard choice. I just took a look at images I've recently edited and now understand why it works, as it has a story to tell.
Thanks for introducing me to John Free. It has bee... (show quote)


I had the same reaction. Glad you liked it.
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 22:26:39   #
Reuss Griffiths wrote:
Rongnongno
Regardless of all the rules of composition and framing you are looking for, the first requirement is to gain the attention of the observer. If they don't look at your image, nothing else matters. The strong central figure, aided by all the compositional elements does exactly that, gets you to look at the image. The image also tells a story or suggests one. What are those girls doing underneath, who is that woman sitting there, how are they all related. All these things go through the observers mind whether he thinks about them or not. I think it's a great image and obviously a lot of the viewers whose attention you got also got up on the wrong side of their beds.
Rongnongno br Regardless of all the rules of compo... (show quote)


Thanks - you nailed it.
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 22:06:44   #
billnikon wrote:


Years ago (if I may) "That Nikon Guy", Matt Granger, the Aussie, did a test of 70-200 2.8's. Canon, Sigma, Nikon. Of course, shooting brick walls and bark on trees was part of it. They all performed well with some focus breathing. Then, the true test. He goes to an event, evening, inside, lower light. He had the Nikon and the Sigma with him. Well guess what - the Sigma couldn't and wouldn't lock focus LOL!!!!!! It was worthless! Sure, it was sharp in good light, yada yada but when the rubber met the road - it was a turd. Shooting a wedding - UNACCEPTABLE! I"m still shooting with a very old Nikon 70-200 2.8 vr1.
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 21:41:30   #
ReFlections wrote:
Thank you. Keep up the good work. Appreciate your post. Glad it is not about Nikon vs Canon, dslr vs mirrorless, or what camera/lens to take to Europe. Keep posting!


Thanks very much! Still surprised - not one photographer from this site has posted one single image of their own on this post or another one I started on composition. It's almost as if we stopped teaching math and science in school. It's now victimhood and gender identity. How to break "rules" in the name of artistic expression because it's hard to be disciplined. The term "rules" offends people LOL!!!!
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 18:29:38   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If you think rules stifle your creativity, you probably don't understand the rules.


exactly
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 13:57:27   #
I watched John Free years ago. I then went out and tried to incorporate 3 or more elements. MUCH harder than I ever anticipated. Here's a link to his video with images. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhViR3Iu2QE&t=30s
Go to
Jul 24, 2022 13:43:00   #
EJMcD wrote:
I get that but why anyone would use that to demonstrate the Rule of Thirds on a photography forum is beyond me when there are countless other examples to be found. Maybe the fact that I am a US Army Veteran, Father to four children and Grandfather to 9, strikes me as a very unusual and disgusting addition to the topic.


You're right......
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.