Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Carusoswi
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 30 next>>
Aug 19, 2020 02:43:42   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Perhaps you have missed the L**T parades in San Francisco where men and women parade in Sado Machistic outfits or naked to support gay behavior. Maybe you missed the sudden thrust (no erotic pun intended) of cross dressing men reading stories to little kids in libraries. If this is not shoving the gay lifestyle down people’s throats I don’t know what is.

I say the above while having numerous gay friends, have attended a gay wedding and have spent much time around gay people. Not one of my L**T friends would ever say I am offended by their lifestyle. I don’t care what they do in their bedroom but I don’t want to see it in public. Screw a sheep if you want, if the sheep has written permission from its mama. But just as my wife and I do not have public displays of affection my friends don’t either.

Dennis
Perhaps you have missed the L**T parades in San Fr... (show quote)


Do you see your L**T friends showing public displays of affections in public? Do you see parades of L**T's showing public displays of affections in public? Cite some examples, please. Your reply ignores the other points I made in my post. Do you believe that your L**T friends should face firing or be passed over for promotion or be kicked out of the military after displaying courage in battle? Do you agree with my HS counselor that I should not have pursued a college degree(s) because no one would ever hire me anyhow?
Do you agree that it is ok for the owner of a house to be arrested while unlocking his/her front door just because he/she is a person of color? You are silent on whether or not you can justify a person at home in his/her own bed being murdered by police as they conduct a botched non-announced warrant on the wrong persons at the wrong address?
Do you grant native Americans any justification in opposing their displacement from lands to which they lay claim just because Europeans 'discovered' a new source of land and riches and could wield superior fire power?
Your reply is silent on all these points which, to my mind, are more important than what you think of your L**T friends and what they think of you.

It appears that you are the only poster to address even one of the points I made in rebuttal of the OP's slate of objections. That seems to prove my point.

Enjoy your position while you can.

We are going to change things.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 02:19:15   #
letmedance wrote:
Here in Ca. we get the b****ts without requesting. I am alone now but I will get 4 b****ts, one for the wife, 2 for relatives that no longer reside here and one for myself. Wow that means I get 4 v**es if I feel like like it.


So I did a quick check to see if you really get 4 v**es if you feel like it:

https://www.sos.ca.gov/e******ns/v**er-registration/v**e-mail/ provides for mail-in b****t to be mailed to every v**er (a v**er would be one who is registered to v**e).

https://www.ncsl.org/research/e******ns-and-campaigns/vopp-table-14-how-states-verify-v**ed-absentee.aspx Scroll down to California to see for yourself how this state verifies mail-in b****ts it receives. If your children are registered v**ers, they could use the b****ts mailed to them. However, if you, yourself v**ed 4 times, three of your b****ts would be rejected (and I believe you might be in a heap of legal trouble).

If you care to avail yourself of the information, it is clear that, if you received 4 b****ts, then your household is on record with 4 registered v**ers. If they are registered, then they are eligible to v**e. If you are alone, now, then where are the other three registered v**ers? Have they moved without notifying the authorities. Are they still in California? If so, I would expect that they are still qualified to v**e.

If you bother to review the information I have provided, then it is clear that California is sending b****ts to what it shows on record as registered v**ers. You, as a single v**er, cannot v**e more than one time without being discovered. V**e two or four times at your own peril. You will be discovered.

Why would you spread such misleading information? Why?

Caruso
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 02:04:47   #
letmedance wrote:
Here in Ca. we get the b****ts without requesting. I am alone now but I will get 4 b****ts, one for the wife, 2 for relatives that no longer reside here and one for myself. Wow that means I get 4 v**es if I feel like like it.


So, what happens to those b****ts? What verification procedures are in place to insure that you cannot cast 4 v**es if you feel like it? You give us the first half of the situation, but leave out the most important second half.

Respond here if you care to do so. I will be off to check out the second half of this procedure for myself. I cannot believe that California or any other state would simply accept any b****t returned with out some procedure in place to check its validity.

Prove me wrong if you can.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 01:53:46   #
Architect1776 wrote:
You really have been suckered into the f**e news definitions and blurring of mail in and absentee b****ts.
Until you gain a basic understanding of this simple concept no further discussion with you is waranted.


Your post was not directed at me, but, where I live, mail-in is virtually identical to absentee. The differences you try to support do not exist in my state. To v**e mail-in, I have first to request a mail-in b****t. It is not sent automatically to my address. I have to sign my b****t before returning. That signature is matched against the sample on record with the local e******ns board. If the signatures do not match, my b****t is rejected.

If you can name jurisdictions that automatically send b****ts to addresses (similar to junk mail) and accept and tabulate v**es without verifying them, please do so. Otherwise, I count your claim as just more unwarranted chatter. My basic understanding of this 'simple concept' is based upon my experience, not some nonsense sputtered by a 'president' who can find nothing better to do.

The rant from the White House against mail-in v****g is rooted in their belief that if every qualified v**er were to v**e in November, they will lose. Of course, everything they do or propose is based upon the Predator's gut feelings (he is so much smarter than the experts, don't you know). He has not bothered to do a study on who (including he, himself) v**es via mail, absentee or otherwise.

There are numerous states that have been v****g via mail (not absentee) for years. The Predator hasn't even noticed them, but he files suit against states that want to implement mail-in due to the p******c, a real issue which he has been woefully slow in acknowledging.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 01:37:01   #
Architect1776 wrote:
News flash mail in is where b****ts are sent to every address regardless of registration, alive or dead, legal or felon etc. NO!!!!!!!!!!!! request is made just sent.
Absentee b****t is requested by a legitimate v**er then returned.

Huge difference and you need to study real hard and learn it.


NEWS FLASH: Mail in in my state is not 'where b****ts are sent to every address.' We here have to send in a request for the mail in b****t. Additionally, we have to sign our b****t, and include our SS# before we return it. The b****t is submitted to our local v****g authority for acceptance and tabulation. It is only counted if our signature on the b****t matches the one on file with the v****g authority.

As when v****g in person, once your mail-in b****t is recorded, you are checked off the list and cannot v**e a second time by any means. The opportunity for fraud, whether v****g in person or by mail is very low.

I think you should do a bit of studying, yourself. It sounds to me as if you get your information from the Predator, and we all know he does not study and doesn't read.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 10:25:41   #
travelwp wrote:
Is that why you picked Biden?


Trump cannot read more than a sentence at a time, if that. That's why he and his 'Republic' supporters are at such a disadvantage. If you are a Trump supporter, it is likely that you suffer from the same non-reading affliction. I feel for you.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 10:57:39   #
jcs wrote:
Some will NEVER have enough .


No one is shoving their “gayness” down your throat unless you feel that you or others have the right to fire a person because he/she is gay, to discriminate against a person simply because he/she identifies as being gay, or if you advocate for firing experienced and loyal combat veterans because they identify as being gay (did your ‘straightness’ serve and see combat in defense of our country?).

You don’t state your race, but persons of color (to whom I guess the second point on your ‘tablet’ refers) only want to be free from discrimination. They would prefer not to be murdered for the crime of being present in their own residence, to have cops called when in the process of unlocking the front door to the home that they own, to be denied employment or advancement, to be chased down while jogging and murdered (“just another ‘N’ said the murderer), to not be asphyxiated by a policeman, and on and on.

As for politics, this country thrives on honest political discussion. It is not condemnation when members of one party criticize the other, so thin your skin.

I do not care where you were born, but if your ancestors held mine in s***ery after bringing them here in chains from their home country, then I will blame them. If you or your ancestors supported George Wallace as he proclaimed that segregation should prevail forever, if you or your ancestors support(ed) the law enforcement officers who cracked John Lewis’ skull as he walked non-violently across the Edmund Pettis Bridge, then I do blame you and your ancestors, and if your ancestors had a part in naming that bridge, I hold them accountable. Fear not, Pettis’ sorry life’s history will never be erased, but he should not be honored by having that bridge named after him. We will right that wrong.

. . . and if you and your apparent ilk never cared where I and my ancestors were born, why such an uproar over Obama’s birth certificate or, now, apparently, the birthplace of Kamala Harris’ parents.

I never cared that you worked hard and were promoted, but I will not accept that, being equally qualified, I was turned away from employment many times because I didn’t look like you. As a straight ‘A’ student in a predominantly white high school, I did not accept advice from my white counselor that I should not bother to attend college, as, I would likely not graduate, but, even if I did, no one would hire me, anyway. To how many other students of color did that evil man give the same advice? If you agree with his advice, then I say loudly that I and those other students of color did experience discrimination, whether you cared or not, whether you were promoted or not.

If your beliefs include the belief that ‘eminent domain’ gave your ancestors the right to run my ancestors off our land, to purchase land, move my ancestors to that alternate location, then push them away from that location as well, then I state that your belief in that instance is, indeed, wrong.

I and my ancestors all showed plenty of patience, and, as you claim for yours, our patience has, indeed, run out. Enjoy your dominance while you can. We will soon outnumber you in society and at the b****t box. Fear not, things will change.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 10:10:07   #
RichieC wrote:
An honest question.. you have a winning lottery ticket- lets say a million dollars. Do you mail it in?

Do you mail it in even if its for $1000.... $500 even.

Why?


When you take your winning lottery ticket in for redemption, do you face long lines? I have never won more than a few dollars (and I rarely play the lottery), but on those few occasions, I was not even asked for ID, never had to compare my signature to one that was on file (because lottery vendors do not keep signatures), they just handed me the money. Do you think my local 7-11 would mail me a check for $4.00 if I mailed in my winning ticket? Do you worry about the possibility that someone will print up millions of fraudulent lottery tickets. Was there ever a history of lottery ticket literacy tests? Do you have to drive across town to find the only purchasing source of lottery tickets?

You are comparing apples to oranges. The point is that mail-in v****g exists successfully in many U.S. states, and its relative cousin, the absentee b****t exists in all states with little evidence of fraud. Even Trump's commission established to bolster his claim of fraud found little and his commission was disbanded.

On the flip side, one can find many instances where polling places are closed to inconvenience v**ers (usually in communities of color), mainly to suppress the v**e. Google is your friend, do a search on closing polling places to see how thousands of v**ers have been forced to wait in long lines because, instead of 5 or 10 polling places, only one was offered.

Presently, we are suffering through this p******c, and there are valid health reasons to make mail-in v****g available, yet we see the Predator via his appointment of an unqualified postmaster general working to dismantle the postal service, ripping out mail boxes, firing qualified, experienced postal service employees, tearing out automatic sorting machines, and sending letters warning v**ers not to use the US mail to submit their mail-in b****ts, while the Predator, for his own convenience, elects to v**e by mail.

You do realize that mail-in b****ts contain the name of the v**er (or, perhaps, in some states, the name must be provided by the v**er when he/she fills out the b****t). In any case, the v**er also has to sign the b****t before it can be counted. That signature is, indeed, matched to a sample specimen on file with the local v****g authorities. It has to match or the b****t is thrown out. There is little opportunity for the Predator's 400 lb guy sitting on his bed to duplicate and send out millions of b****ts to ineligible v**ers. Moreover, there is little evidence that mail-in b****ts favor one political party over the other, just another of the Predator's unfounded fears.

Trump's only reason for his opposition to mail-in b****ts is his fear that he will not be re-elected if all eligible v**ers have an unfettered opportunity to cast a b****t.

I can sympathize with the Predator's fears, for he is surely going to lose, his aggressive effort to suppress the v**e notwithstanding.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 09:06:05   #
soba1 wrote:
I don’t think her father is black I could be wrong. Just because someone has a dark complexion does not make them black. It’s a culture a mindset, a dark skinned Indian, an Aborigine, for good measure a dark skinned Native from Mexico, or say South America.


So, you are saying that Obama was not black, right.
I get it.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 08:55:31   #
dpullum wrote:
My apologies Shooter, for straying off-topic. I agree that Kamala Harris is not black-black rather a blend altho people of India are sufficiently black to be as a VP said about my well educated Indian-Punjab-England educated hard working Biochemist... he was my "Porch Monkey." That VP and I had a few words in 1990 I reported to corporate, he only to the president of that division. So to that VP, from India qualified my Biochemist as being Black-black. Danger Punjabis are fierce warriers.
https://barusahib.org/general/sikh-are-greatest-warrior-in-the-history/
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/porch_monkey

If it is ok for Trump to portray himself as a healthy man with orange pancake makeup to cover his gray/blue aged sickly skin, is it ok if Kamala Harris uses a darkening cream? Where on this chart does Ms Harris fit and where is black enough to identify oneself as black.
https://www.loreal.hk/research-and-innovation/customerinnovation/knowhairandskin

Trump in contrast is congestive heart failure ghostly pale blue/white and so uses makeup to cover his before death FDR gray old-man death pallor. Low blood oxygen level. Cyanosis refers to a bluish color of the skin and mucous membranes. The low blood oxygen can explain some of the Cerebral hypoxia is a form of hypoxia (reduced supply of oxygen), specifically involving the ... A T***sient Ischemic Aphasia, TIA, may cause sudden dimming or loss of vision, aphasia, slurred speech, and mental confusion. The symptoms of a TIA typically resolve within 24. Last week's confused press conference exhibited Trump's TIA.

The makeup is discussed:
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/12/6/20998822/trump-orange-concealer-bronx-colors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expressive_aphasia

So, I put my v**e on Kamala Harris with iffy blackness curable by darkening cream vs Trump and his on the edge of death blue covered by orange makeup. And agree with Shooter that Harris may not be really black-black in color or heritage altho she can understand and help eradicate the upside-down economy ine******y.

Darkening cream will not affect Harris's young high energy sharp mind. In contrast, the Orange cream used by Trump to cover his blue hypoxia that results in mental confusion caused by perhaps progressive congestive heart failure. At 300 pounds on a high-fat diet, Trump is a ticking time bomb.

Summary: In a race do not bet on a dying confused horse, Trump, that confuses a whinny with a heehaw. Better to bet on a young filly, Harris, that can run fast and can stomp her foot to answer the question of 2+2=4.
My apologies Shooter, for straying off-topic. I a... (show quote)


I am a product of a mixed marriage. My mother was white, my father, what we call black. His heritage included African American and Native American. When I fill out forms (in doctors' offices, on government forms, etc.), rarely is there a box that I can check to accurately describe who I am. That's not my fault. My birth certificate says I am black because, in those days, if there was knowledge (by the "authorities") that there was any person of color in ones ancestry, you were black, period.

Harris is who she is, born where she was born, an American citizen, a Senator. Elect or v**e against her for her platform. Skip the r****m. Those of us who have suffered have had enough.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 08:44:39   #
skylane5sp wrote:
I remember things she said, positions she took, and there are lots of videos of her showing her trying to 'grab that ring'(mouthing what's politically expedient), no matter what direction it leads her. She earned her nickname, Heels Up Harris.


So, list the things she said and give us reference to time and date, show us the videos (clearly, you would not be referencing her hobbling of Barr during Senate hearings where he was at a loss for words to answer a simple questions).

"Heels Up Harris", really?

If her heels were up, it occurred during natural relations with her husband, to which she was not required to pay hush funds, funds which came from his campaign illegally, funds, payment for which, he sent his cover guy to prison. Your protests ring hollow.

Predator supporters are going to have a tough time during the next 90 or so days. Compared to the Predator, there is little about which to criticize the Democratic ticket.

Good luck.

See you in November.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 08:34:56   #
boberic wrote:
White L***s M****r. Black Privileged. The other day a 5 year old white boy was brutally murdered by a black man for the horrible act of riding his bike on the man's front yard. The black man approached the boy and at point blank range shot him in the head, instantly k*****g him. Where is the outrage? The Protests. The R**ts? The fires? The crowds Screaming WHITE L***S M****R. Where is the L**TING? There is very little difference between the murder in Minnesota and this murder one resulted in chaos and the other did not,
White L***s M****r. Black Privileged. The other d... (show quote)


Where, when, and a link to the story, please.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 07:50:14   #
usken65 wrote:
I have seen the video. He opposed 28billion the post office needs for universal mail in v****g. He is not defunding the post office. Stop the f**e news lies.


Why does he oppose an issue that the majority of Americans, given the p******c, support? Mail-in v****g is ok in 'Republic' states, not in states where Democrats are in power. Mail-in v****g is ok for him, just not for Democrats. Moreover, why does he appoint a lackey to run the USPS, and why is he pulling up mailboxes, removing mail-handling machines, and firing career USPS workers?

This is not f**e news. These are facts.

Make excuses for his dreadful administration while you can. We will correct this, no matter his attempts to obstruct and suppress the v**e come November.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 07:44:34   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Politicians put laws in effect that caused it to lose money.

"Under the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006, the USPS is required to pay $5.4 billion to $5.8 billion annually, through 2016, to pay for future retiree health benefits."

"We must pay today for benefits that will not be paid out until some future date," the Postal Service said. "Other federal agencies and most private sector companies use a 'pay-as-you-go' system, by which the entity pays premiums as they are billed ... The funding requirement, as it currently stands, contributes significantly to postal losses."
Politicians put laws in effect that caused it to l... (show quote)


Ah, thank you for pointing this out! I have been slugging through these posts, many of which are ridiculous. Most posters do not realize that the USPS is not a business, and most are unaware of the draconian benefit funding requirements imposed upon the USPS mainly to hobble it financially, then claim that it operates at a loss.

Now, we have a self-centered Predator in the White House who would like to do away with the USPS entirely. As usual, his approach does not take into account the many tangential results of his short-cited, self-centered, poorly crafted actions.

It will not work.

Liberty and justice, at some point, will prevail.

Caruso
Go to
Aug 15, 2020 07:37:06   #
Longshadow wrote:
I tried to pick another item that people may NOT want discussed on a photography forum.

So a moderator is needed to decide what is ethical, since people can't.....

Would you care for everyone discussing politics during your Art Club meeting? Or band practice?
Or your birthday party? There are times and places...........


No, but when I want to discuss photography on this forum, I go to those sections defined as photography based sections. You have to select 'All Sections' to get to the 'Attic' which is provided as a section where most anything goes.

If you want to restrict your exposure to photographic discussion only, then, do yourself a favor, and go to those sections.

Of course, you and your ilk already know this, you just don't like it when the Predator, through his own stupidity, steps in a pile so deep that it cannot be cleaned off his shoes. You v**ed for him, and you will v**e for him again, but this time, he will not be re-elected. Enjoy defending your position while you can. His time is short.

Caruso
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 30 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.