Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: bpulv
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 146 next>>
Jul 1, 2020 13:29:46   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
Regular electronic flash works fine with IR. You only need IR flash if you want the flash to be less visible. These are IR shots with backlighting and fill lighting from a standard flash.


Nice photos!
Go to
Jul 1, 2020 11:07:44   #
Lucian wrote:
I used to use my Nikon for IR but there are several factors to consider. You have to buy an expensive filter for every size lens you wish to use, you have to compose then put on the filter so you no longer can see what you are doing or if anything moved. You also have to focus on a different point for IR. A standard lens focusing on a point is not the same point of focus with IR Light, I am assuming you knew that right? There is an IR mark on your lens to show where it needs to be slightly moved to once normally focused, in order that the IR image will be correctly focused. Then there is a very long exposure time of many seconds and finally a long camera processing time before you can use it again.

In the end I bought a converted camera which allows me to use it like a normal camera, see the shots immediately, even freeze someone jumping in the air in IR or photograph a horse trotting by, none of which I could do with my standard Nikon and a dark filter.

As for live view, I don't know how you can see anything, since it still goes through the filter and lens anyway, if shooting with a standard camera and IR filter on the lens. Go with a converted camera, you will be much happier and use it far more often, trust me, I've been through it. I bought a converted camera from a company that did conversions, I had the choice of using my own camera to convert or they had a selection of used cameras that they had already converted. I went that route and bought one for just a little more than it would have cost me to convert my own.

That was years ago, it was the Panasonic DMC-LZ10 Lumix which has a Leica lens with a 5X optical zoom and was only 10MGPXL but it did what I needed and I'm still using it today.
I used to use my Nikon for IR but there are severa... (show quote)


When I was an Air Force photographer in the 1960's, we had a box of 4 x 5 infrared film and number 40 infrared flashbulbs in our inventory. I experimented by taking flash IR photographs in the base movie theater using a Speed Graphic camera during a show and got terrific results. The flashbulbs were not invisible; they produced a deep red flash, but no one seamed to be disturbed by it. We used one of those photos in that year's base guidebook. It is too bad that no one manufacturers an infrared electronic flash.
Go to
Jul 1, 2020 09:30:50   #
hoola wrote:
What if I use live view(which my Nikon D5300's have) ?? Will view still be dark ?


All modern lenses are color corrected for the range of wavelengths that make up visible light. Color correction compensates for those wavelengths so they all come to a sharp focus on your sensor. There is no optical compensation in your lenses, however for infrared waves that are outside the visible light spectrum.
So you must compensate for that when you focus. Some older film cameras and lenses had a mark on the focusing ring that showed the position to focus at infinity when using infrared film, but DSLRs do not. Focusing on your LCD or through your TTL viewfinder will NOT allow you to make that compensation since you will only be viewing and focusing on visible light. You really need an infrared converted camera to eliminate the frustration you may encounter by simply using a filter.
Go to
Jun 30, 2020 09:02:01   #
scubadoc wrote:
When using a carbon fiber 4 section tripod at less than full height, which is more stable: shortening by collapsing the thinnest legs at the bottom or by collapsing the thickest legs at the top? I imagine this would apply both to my heavy RRS and my travel tripod, the Feisol CT-3442.


Regardless of the tripod size and weight, collapse the bottom section first. Also, on a carbon fiber tripod, never fully extend any of the legs. Always leave about two inches on each leg unextended. That will make an otherwise shaky tripod ridged.
Go to
Jun 30, 2020 08:57:58   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
I have been reading up on the use of histograms and find one issue missing - motion.

Most articles end with something like: "Never use your LCD for exposure again!" or something to that effect but, can you expose your image using the histogram when your subject is moving? Sounds pretty obvious but, for beginning photographers, this glaring omission could frustrate the daylights out of the newbie.

Do you use your histogram in your photography or is it a tool that is overlooked and left alone in the Menu section of your camera?
I have been reading up on the use of histograms an... (show quote)


I use histograms all the time to confirm proper exposure in the camera and during editing both in Lightroom and Photoshop. It is the surest way to confirm proper exposure settings. It is especially important for a newcomer such as yourself to learn and use histograms as part of learning the exposure triangle and how to manually set your camera; a basic required skill.
Go to
Jun 28, 2020 21:26:33   #
photophile wrote:
Thanks Ed, nice removal. Smart Photo Editor has an erase tool also which I usually use.


FYI, "Ed" means that I edited the post. The UUH software did not let me post the second photograph until I posted and then went into the edit mode.
Go to
Jun 28, 2020 09:20:05   #
photophile wrote:
Gleason Farm plus a frog on the path:


In general, I like your photographs, however, photo number 4 has two utility poles in at the middle of interest and both photos number 4 and 5 have distracting power lines. Those distractions can easily be removed in Photoshop.

Ed




Go to
Jun 27, 2020 10:47:19   #
phlash46 wrote:
Well done!


Go to
Jun 26, 2020 13:43:35   #
willaim wrote:
I have the Pro-100 and have been using a third party paper, but all of a sudden, for some reason the colors were off. I tried the Red River Exploration Sample Kit and I could not believe what a difference it made. It gives you the right profile for each paper to use for your printer. The colors were as close to my monitor as never before. Not familiar with your printer, but you might try Red River Paper before you decide to purchase the Pro-100, which, by the way is excellent.


There are multiple possible reasons for the color shift. First of all, check the firmware version of your Pro-100. The latest version is 2.003. My printer has 2.001 firmware, but I am not having any issues because I use only Canon paper and inks. The other variable you should consider is the ink you are using. If you are using third party inks, I would highly recommend that you switch to the Canon inks because the colors of third party inks are notorious for batch to batch inconsistencies. That can make a huge difference on some papers.
Go to
Jun 26, 2020 11:59:08   #
RoswellAlien wrote:
After it has served admirably (albeit a bit slowly) for 7 or so years, I would like to replace my MacBookPro. I had pretty much decided to go with an iMac desktop and keep the laptop for odds and ends.
HOWEVER, read the other day that Apple is going to start phasing in their own processor chips and phase out Intel, and they’re going to start with MacBooks and tablets, picking up desktops later.
For all you knowledgeable Mac wonks out there, and I’m not being sarcastic*, should I stick with Plan A and get the iMac or wait until the new chips are out and go with another MacBook? I think the article said things should start happening in 2021.

Thanks

*The IT folks at the HS where I taught said I knew enough about the school’s computers to be dangerous. Only crashed one of the labs once - better than some of my colleagues. ;-)

Thanks again.
After it has served admirably (albeit a bit slowly... (show quote)


Regardless of which Apple product you are considering, Apple is always evolving their products and with each change somethings are added while others become obsolete. So, if you are always waiting for everything before you buy, you will never buy anything. That is the dilemma with any computer product regardless of brand.

If you need a new computer now, I would not wait what for a product that they are predicting will come out in a year or two. There can be delays when release is that far out. Additionally, it is not a good idea to buy a new version of a computer or upgrade you OS on an old one until it has been on the market long enough for the bugs to be worked out. To me that means if a new feature is to come out in a year and it actually does, I must wait another three to six months before the on line chatter says it is stable before I make my purchase.

When planning to buy your new iMac you should also consider that your new computer will have a 64-bit OS and your old 32-bit software will not work on your new machine. So you will need to plan for the cost of purchasing new versions of some of your programs.
Go to
Jun 26, 2020 11:41:28   #
foathog wrote:
I have a feeling I already know the answer but here goes. I have a Canon G4210 printer which prints OK photos. It's no Pro 100. Would I gain anything by using Red River paper with it? Or should I stick with the Canon paper?


Unless you have a calibrator that allows you to for both calibrate your monitor and profile and calibrate your printer, I would stick with the papers that are already in you printer's color profiles list.
Go to
Jun 25, 2020 15:06:36   #
hiker60 wrote:
Thanks for sharing. The 4014 is an impressive engine. Not surprising that this area has been discovered by photographers. Years ago, I did quite a bit of photo work in the area and rarely saw any other photographers. Believe it or not, engineers even had their cab windows open--and waved.


They don't necessary wave, but if you give them the whistle signal (pumping your arm up and down) they will often blow their horn for you.
Go to
Jun 25, 2020 14:41:51   #
dmr wrote:
I am in over my head. An Adobe article (Fed 2020) says Newer versions LR Classic not compatable OS10.15.
and cannot use uninstaller to uninstall LR6 Cannot even open LR6. Even if I uninstall lr how do I link up the catalog


Your problem is that the Catalina OS is a 64-bit program and is not compatible with 32-bit software. I have a computer that is part of my editing system that I have not yet upgraded from Mojave for that exact reason. If you have already upgraded and did not save your old OS system to a disk or other media before you upgraded to Catalina, you will not be able to go back to Mojave. If that is the case, you are out of luck and will need to upgrade your software.
Go to
Jun 25, 2020 12:43:19   #
bsprague wrote:
--> "I will move on to LRCC. My photos are on an external drive."

No. Don't do that. Take the subscription and use "Lightroom Classic". It will have the workflow you are used to and will automatically update your catalog without destroying your old one.


---> " any editing becomes saved in the new catalog which can only be interpreted by LRCC."

Lightroom CC is a new more "mobile" editing program. You will get it with the subscription but it will be a major change to your workflow. As you move forward with the subscription you will find good ways to use Lightroom CC with Lightroom Classic.


--> Can I install LRCC on a second computer? How do save a second copy of the original catalog? CC is the non cloud version

Lightroom CC keeps your images on Adobe Servers. Therefore you can work with them from as many devices you can find that are connected to the internet. Lightroom Classic (like the one you are used to) can be used on two computers. There is NOTHING purposefully built into Lightroom Classic to make it a multi user system. All efforts at that are user invented tricks. One such trick is to put the catalog on an external drive with the photo files but that normally slows it down a lot.

--> "I have never used PS before "

With the upgrade to the current Lightroom Classic you will find less need for Photoshop. But, since it is included in the subscription, it has several things it can do better than Lightroom. My favorite is the removal of ugly tourists in my travel photos.
--> "I will move on to LRCC. My photos are... (show quote)


LR CC and LR Classic CC both have a setting that allows you to only save your photos to local drives and not use the cloud. I never use cloud storage for anything. Instead, everything is on a system were both primary and backup storage reside on 32Tb of storage including offsite storage of backup drives in my bank safe deposit box.
Go to
Jun 25, 2020 12:37:26   #
Adorama and B&H have the longest and best reputation of any camera stores in the country. They both guard their reputations jealously. They are the last vendors on the Internet I would worry about.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 146 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.