Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: minniev
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 874 next>>
Oct 25, 2021 09:15:59   #
KindaSpikey wrote:
I'm pretty sure that almost all here own decent or excellent cameras, but I imagine that quite a lot of us (myself included), sometimes see the opportunity for a great shot and don't have our camera to hand. We do however have our phones. The quality of the cameras on the phones is getting better and better, so I'm wondering if any of you regularly use any post processing apps made specifically for phones? I came across a free app a while ago called "Snapseed", and if you haven't already tried it, I highly recommend it! I'd be interested to know if any of you have used anything other than that one that you would recommend.
I'm pretty sure that almost all here own decent or... (show quote)


I use my phone a lot more than I once did for spontaneous captures. My primary editors are the mobile versions of Lightroom and Photoshop Express which are available to anyone who has an Adobe subscription. But I also use the Apple Photos built in editor, Snapseed (similar to the NIK computer plugins), Lenka (for black and white), and fun/creative aps like Distressed, PaintCan, Brushstroke and Glaze. Some apps allow me to control the camera functions of my phone a little more directly than the native app does, though I'm sure that varies from phone to phone and model to model. Mine is not the latest version of iPhone.
Go to
Oct 19, 2021 18:57:38   #
An interesting discussion that I hope to follow. I do quite a bit of this for fun, most of it fantasy compositing. Sometimes I think of something I want to try and shoot the components like you did here, then cobble them together on layers as you’ve described here. Sometimes I find bits and pieces in my catalogue like others of you have described. Sometimes I use some of my own photos and parts of things I find online, especially in the extensive Creative Commons collections offered by most large museums now.

If shooting for a planned composite, choices about how to shoot (focus, aperture, lighting, white balance) all affect how believable the composite will be in the end. And to make a composite “feel” right to the viewer, we have to learn to control these factors in post processing if we must, to make them work. Shadows must all lean the same way, focus must fade from the subject into the distance in a believable manner, colors tend to fade from the focus point as well. Light must be maneuvered to fall similarly across the created frame. I struggle to make these things work properly.

I confess the only people I’ve ever posed for a planned composite are my grandsons, who willingly pretend to hang from a cliff or jump from one chair to another to create an image that has them jumping over a raging river or hanging off Half Dome, or holding a water bottle with a dragon in it. More often I’m using an onion for a moon, or creating a beauty shop for egrets to get their feathers done. Most recently, I’ve begun trying to learn how to use a mixer brush to overpaint composites for a different look.

It’s my fun!
Go to
Sep 13, 2021 16:53:31   #
After attempting a boring star photo, I rounded up a few from my archives to add to this interesting thread. Because I use a small sensor camera, I often tinker with such shots in ways that make the noise less bothersome. Besides, tinkering in post is just as much fun for me as taking photos.

1. Bourbon St in New Orleans is a great place for night shots
2. Monhegan Island, Maine, opening of lobster season starts after midnight on Oct. 1 each year, and the fishermen row out to the lobster boats that are loaded with traps and anchored in the harbor.
3. Mesa Arch at sunrise is iconic. Mesa Arch before sunrise is blue.
4.Nashville has the biggest July 4 fireworks show in the US


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Sep 13, 2021 16:44:44   #
Craigdca wrote:
We had a thunderstorm behind our San Gabriel Mountains last night and I was excited to try some flash photography.

f/6.3, ISO 400, ss varied as I used bulb setting and an IR remote to trigger and end exposures.

It was a huge challenge to focus on the mountains as it was very dark. I got a ton of dead pixels again and, after some research, found pixelfixer.org that solved the problem.


Those are quite nice. I've never tried anything like this in a storm.
Go to
Sep 13, 2021 16:43:53   #
jaredjacobson wrote:
By the definition of night given (anything where the sun is below the horizon), most sunset and sunrise photos would qualify, in which case I probably have more than a thousand photos within the genre. Even laying aside sunrises and sunsets, my biggest challenge was cutting down the number of photos to post. I was surprised how many photos I take at night, and the breadth of approaches.


Love that city scape. Very nicely done.

The black and white shot is wonderfully mysterious.
Go to
Sep 5, 2021 12:15:01   #
fergmark wrote:
A little contribution to the After Dark topic this month. The first is the only recent photo in this batch. The rest go back fifteen to twenty years. Starting with the first, I had gone down to the beach early, and only because of the fog. The second two were taken after midnight while on Monhegan Island. The cloud cover made it very dark, and were both around twenty second exposures. I like the grainy quality that this very early sensor produced.
The next three are fire as you can see. A more complicated endeavor than I would have imagined. The bigger the fire, the more light, and lower the iso can go, but the hotter the fire, the faster it moves, requiring a faster shutter speed. If you didn't have a high enough shutter speed it's just a blur, and I wanted well defined flames. Hard to get a workable balance, and the only place where I could produce these large fires was a friends place in Vermont. The last two tripod mounted, seeing what I could come up with moving the camera around.
A little contribution to the After Dark topic this... (show quote)


Interesting, widely varied set. I’m intrigued with your fire series, something I’ve never even thought of. Fascinating abstracts.

Love your Monhegan after dark images. I’ve never tried to shoot the Sheridan after dark, but it makes a wonderfully moody images. I did try some there and once I get back home I may retrieve one from the archives to post. I’ve some of the harbor, one of the lighthouse, and some taken of the boats going out before sunrise on Trap Day. None of them are any good. I have much more study to do before I can figure this kind of photography out.
Go to
Sep 5, 2021 12:10:23   #
pmorin wrote:
From the Desert to the Sea

My contribution is a themed set taken at different locations at different times of year, Fall and Winter. The first was taken just a few minutes before sunrise in Palm Springs on the way to the golf course. The second was taken at Ola' Mexican Grill in Huntington Beach just a few minutes after sunset.


The most vivid colors seem to happen just after sunset or just before sunrise. Lovely pair.
Go to
Sep 5, 2021 12:07:45   #
CassidyMariya wrote:
hello! i took this image with my iphone!
it’s a image i took on a ferry!
what do you think?


Nice colors. It’s almost an abstract with its bands of color.
Go to
Sep 5, 2021 12:06:52   #
Fred Harwood wrote:
Handheld Minolta 101, converted slide. Kitzingen, Germany, April 1965.
Ghostly walkers, perhaps a bus.


I really like your ghosts!
Go to
Sep 5, 2021 12:06:09   #
ebrunner wrote:
After Dark

Our topic for this month will be night time photography. Let’s define it as anything shot while the sun is not above the horizon. This would include the blue hour in the evening after the sun drops below the horizon and also the blue hour before the sun emerges from below the horizon in the morning.

Long exposures that show light streaks from passing cars are a good example for this challenge. You might also think about landscapes, especially in the morning when there is a glow on the horizon; but the sun is not yet above the horizon. Clouds will also feature in any landscape photos because they show color before the sun rises and they hold color after the sun sets.

You can chose photos from your archives; but it is hoped that this challenge might also inspire you to go out and shoot during September with the topic in mind. Let us know if this is something you do regularly and what challenges the topic might have presented. Remember that this is not a photo competition; but instead an opportunity to discuss the topic. I’ll offer an example to get us started; but this is only a starting point. This will probably be a long thread. Don’t let that discourage you. It is, after all, a big topic. Have fun.
Erich


The posted photos. I'm going to post three photos to get the topic started. I took my own advice and shot all of these this evening. There was no color because the sky was completely overcast. I checked sunset time and all were shot after sunset. The liquor store was shot without a tripod. I used high ISO and relatively fast shutter with wide open aperture. For the long exposure shot of the boat, I totally forgot to take into account that the waves would move the boat. (Parked cars remain sharp, parked boats not so much). I'll post others throughout the month; but these might serve as an example of the type of photos you can get without any sun.
Have fun shooting
After Dark br br Our topic for this month will be... (show quote)


Challenging topic! Good for you for taking new photos for the project. Nice set, especially the one of the store with its array of lights. One of the benefits of our current technology is that it is possible to shoot after dark without a tripod. For some of us, that benefit comes at the great expense of high, noise inducing ISOs. Cameras with larger sensors hold up to the task better than those with small sensors. I’m one of those who uses a small sensor camera for a variety of reasons. And I’ve never tried night photography because of the noise involved.

I was at the country house when this topic posted, and decided I’d try a “star” photo. I am sure I don’t understand this process because I’ve seen star type photos taken with cameras like mine that are quite nice. I cannot say the same for my own effort here, so I’ll have to study more about settings. I do think a tripod would have helped but didn’t have it with me so here’s the outcome. A tripod would not have made the setting (yard and forest and field) more interesting, but I might have got more interesting sky features and would have been able to use a longer exposure. Clearly I have a lot to learn about settings and processing this type of image.

Thanks for encouraging us to try something different. I may try some more before the month is out.


(Download)
Go to
Aug 22, 2021 13:07:37   #
JimRPhoto wrote:
Thank you minniev and ChrisKet. I just looked at my photos setting. At the bottom, I did have “keep originals” chosen. Also, all the slider switches above that, in the photos setting page, are slid to “off” so none of them is active. But as I say, I think somehow, the iPad program assumes I want to export to a cloud or send the file and is thus reducing the file size. The lesson learned for me is to never edit with the Apple software, as in about five years of my method of doing backups (onto the SanDisk stick using the iPad) never before have I seen this issue. Thanks again to all. JimR.
Thank you minniev and ChrisKet. I just looked at ... (show quote)


There are two places for the Keep Originals settings. One is in the Photos Ap settings. The other is in icloud settings that you access by clicking your name or icon on the top of the settings menu, then going down to the Photos subsection. Check both places. The key setting there is third from the top, and it's a blue check mark instead of a slider. It needs to be on Download and Keep Originals, not Optimize iPad storage. What you describe sounds like the Photos settings, not the ICloud settings.

It may, of course, be some new default setting that has dropped in via a recent Apple update (I hate that they want to think for us so much). The Apple user forums are a great place to sort out a difficulty like this. I have always been able to find someone that knows more than me about any issue over there!

All that said, if you have an Adobe subscription, the lightroom iPad ap is a good solution for edits and transfers.
Go to
Aug 22, 2021 11:22:54   #
MS. DONNA wrote:
Soooo for the longest time my old Mac (not a laptop) would shut down a lot while I was working in Lr that’s all I use it for. It was 8 years old. Bought a brand new Mac have had it for 2 weeks …. It to just shuts down now. Does anyone else have this problem !?????? It has to be with Adobe I’m thinking


I've been using Adobe programs on a variety of macs for 15 years and the only times I ever had a computer just shut down on its own was a failure in the power source (either the electrical connection or the part inside the computer called "power supply") or the incipient failure of an external peripheral. If you are using a very old computer or one with too little memory, a memory hog program may hang or even crash but it doesn't usually take down the computer. Once you restart, you should be able to get some information from the log about what was going on behind the scenes when the computer went down. Last year I had this sort of problem when an external drive I keep my photos on was beginning to fail. It was still working so I didn't even suspect it. I ran the utility check on all my drives and one did not pass; I replaced it and the problem went away.

For the new computer, you really should contact Apple. You may need to take it into the service center to be checked. They provide great tech support. For the older out-of-warranty computers, the Apple online message boards have been very helpful for me.
Go to
Aug 22, 2021 11:05:42   #
JimRPhoto wrote:
Hello Fellow UHHers. I typically save all my day’s photos onto my iPad when I’m away from home. This time, since i was away for a few days, I did some editing on the iPad, which has pretty capable tools on it. However, I noted when I then uploaded these edited photos into my computer, that the file size was much much smaller. Typically my photos are about 7 to 10 mb, but these photos edited on the iPad are less than 1 mb. Does anyone know why this is? Thank you! JimR


I also use my iPad as short term camera storage when traveling. I use Lightroom instead of Photos for on the road editing of my camera photos and consequently use Adobe cloud instead of icloud to transfer camera photos to my home computer, so my workflow is not exactly the same as yours. I have never encountered the overcompression you are describing. My full resolution photos download to home computer from the cloud when I get home.

As someone has already noted, I wonder if you may have your icloud preferences for Photos set to "optimize icloud storage". I would suggest you uncheck that box and check "download and keep originals" instead. Let us know if this solves it or not.
Go to
Aug 14, 2021 16:11:28   #
fergmark wrote:
I looked through the folder from the Salton Sea and picked a couple more. The fish at my feet had seen better days and the neighborhood intersection as well.


You are the only person I know besides myself who has taken pictures of rotting fish that we could classify in the fine art category. Pictures of trophy fish, yes. Pictures of fish in a colorful fish market, yes. I think this is a small niche. I like this very much while at the same time wondering what happened here - did someone catch them and cast them aside? Did they die from a toxic event in the water? Were they victims of a storm? Deliberate drainage of a lake? Dead creatures always have a story to tell, and quite often the villain in the story is two-legged, in one way or another.

A few oldsters here might have seen this one when I first posted it years ago, named "A Terrible Beauty". I came upon this cache of what is essentially dead dinosaurs while exploring a bayou in the Mississippi delta out from the village of Rolling Fork. Gars are some of the most ancient surviving creatures on the planet. I suspect these were trapped and killed by human fishermen who were their competitors for the same prey.


(Download)
Go to
Aug 13, 2021 12:33:01   #
R.G. wrote:
This one focuses more on the less-than-pristine aspects of the building. It was a worthwhile subject and I'm glad I bothered and glad that I worked the scene.
.


This is absolutely wonderful, and is exactly what I loved about Scotland - the old buildings set into beautiful landscapes. The details keep me looking at every nook and cranny in the image. I hope one day I'll have a chance to return and see more jewels like this.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 874 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.