Canon is generally late as one sees in going to AF. But when they finally did it was 30 years ahead of every other system on the market. In fact Nikon finally got something similar just now with the Z system.
It appears the RF system is another leap including the DPAF and rumored QPAF. This system of AF allows old FD, FL and R Canon lenses to take advantage of focus peaking far more accurately than other systems AF methods of phase/contrast combo AF. In addition to the DPAF for EF and RF lenses hyper accuracy.
That is why it is good to look at Canon rumors and wait a bit before jumping ship.

Or GAS. Yesterday I finally made the decision to dip into the mirrorless ocean and also jumped ship on my dedication to Canon. I picked a Sony A7iii because I've listened to many positive comments about this camera. I'm still hanging on to my Canon gear, because they have become second nature to my shooting habits and work very well. I already noticed how different and ergonomically unfriendly the controls are compared to the Canons. I have 15 days to get fully acclimated to the operation of this fine camera before it gets returned. Also which lens adapter do you recommend to use Canon EF lenses.

It's hard for me to see how auto ISO wouldn't be all over the place taking pictures in the "dappled woods." I lead photo tours in the Tongass National Forest where the difference between shadows and highlights is many stops. How would auto ISO know which of those spots was the one to base the exposure on? It's the exact situation where you need to have complete control of exposure. I use exposure compensation, one way or the other, for almost every shot and it's one of the first controls I delve into on a tour. None the less, I learn something more about Auto ISO every time this discussion comes up, so keep sharing.
...Cam

My vision declined with age. I don't do well with small fonts and need good light and contrast to see well.

My main requirement is a big screen that I can use as my computer monitor hanging on the wall at eye level 24 - 30" away. I'm not sure how this would work out with my current Graphics Processor (NVIDIA Quadro M600M) in a ThinkPad P70 laptop.

I have an Eizo 24" monitor I can use for Post Processing. I think it's a CTX, but it's in storage currently; it's definitely not the top of the line.

Would you please provide any suggestions, data, or advice you have?

I'm open to getting a big computer monitor if needed and not too expensive.

Thanks in advance for your input.

Attention all high-action sports photographers. Never having shot outdoor soccer before, I just received my first ever 400mm; F2.8, Prime lens. Now I desperately need to practice and learn as quickly las possible, how best to get competing soccer players running across the pitch very far away in my view finder or digital screen; and begin to pan them with my aperature set at F2.8; my ISO set at "auto"; my shutter speed set at 1/1250 second to freeze all action, while trying to keep them in focus using back camera focusing, before the upcoming game one week away. My extra long telephoto lens will be mounted on a Robus Heavy Duty tripod with a Manfrotto 393 HEAVY DUTY GIMBAL TYPE camera mount on top of the tripod, allowing my Sony A7RIV to hang off the back of the lens and rotate up and down as well as sideways. I need to accomplish these techniques during the next week, without any outdoor soccer games happening in Wichita, Kansas at this time. My best idea I can come up with is to set up my equipment on my tripod in a parking lot about 150 feet from a busy street, with cars traveling to both to my right and left; practice panning the cars for an hour; go back home and download the images onto my desktop computer and edit them to determine what changes I need to make to my shooting technique and camera settings. Then I need to do it all over again at night time, panning the cars headlights, similar to what it will be at the outdoor soccer game under lights. Any ideas that are better than the only one I can think of, will be much appreciated.