Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Jim Plogger
Page: <<prev 1 ... 468 469 470 471 472 473 next>>
Feb 21, 2012 17:09:59   #
larrycumba wrote:
suzie123 wrote:
I shoot with a Canon 40D and use a 100mm lense for macro. I shoot handheld and alway have a nice soft effect to my photo which I like but, lately I have wanted to achieve the crisp, clean, max detail picture. What is the trick other then a tripod? Is it a photoshop thing, do I need a better quality lense, is it the aperture not open enough. Would appreciate any help. I will switch computers and send a picture along.


Since I am an enabler, here is your answer.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/647011-USA/Canon_3554B002_EF_100mm_f_2_8L_Macro.html
quote=suzie123 I shoot with a Canon 40D and use a... (show quote)


This is a great lens but the answer is technique more than anything else. I believe suzie was shooting with a 100mm Macro. It may not be the L lens, but that really does not matter.

:lol:
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 16:00:56   #
the f/stops here wrote:
Jekbeck60, So whats wrong with a putty colored lens. Get a black or camo lenscoat, or ... look into the Sigma 150-500mm lens. I own one, as well as the Canon 100-400mm lens and the Sigma operates equally in sharpness. The IS is not as good and focusing is a tad bit slower but great lens for the price and it comes in black!

Remember the f/stops here! Have fun, J. Goffe


Everyone needs to keep in mind that you give up speed in most of these long telephoto zooms. The Sigma 100-500 has a max aperature of f6.3 at 500mm.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 11:52:40   #
jekbeck60 wrote:
I currently have a Canon Xti with a 24 - 105 lens. I am thinking about upgrading to 7d - or perhaps one of the 'new' canon's once we know exactly what they are. I also want a lens something like the canon 100 - 400 mm, however, I don't feel comfortable with the white lenses, I know they are the best, but just do not want to draw attention. What might be the next best lens in the 100 - 350/400 category.
I'd be grateful for any assistance anyone can give me.


The Canon EF 24-105L is the lens that stays on my camera. The 100-400L is excellent but very heavy and is the not the best for handheld shots. I use mine on a tripod most of the time. I find that my EF 70-300/4.0-5.6 IS USM is great for most handheld shots depending the light. I would make that my next lens and then later you might want to add the 100-400. It does not necessarily have to be a Canon lens. Tamron and Sigma also makes a 70-300.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 09:36:55   #
Wanda Krack wrote:
JPinTenn, nice flowers! The first one is my favorite. I also use colors behind flowers sometimes, especially something like iris, that can stand alone. I have used all colors (poster boards), but white is probably my favorite. When hiking, I have used the cover to my reflector/diffuser (black or white, gold or silver). I find when shooting individual blossoms it sometimes helps to have a background different than the surroundings. Another place I have used 'artificial' backgrounds is in greenhouses. Nurseries are wonderful places to shoot blooming flowers in the early spring time. But, it doesn't bode well with me to have a busy background, and sometimes even clutter, when the blossom is so beautiful. Green houses are wonderful places to catch flowers in good, diffused lighting. So, when I go to the greenhouse to take pictures, I make sure I have something that I can stand up behind the flower, and usually have both black and white, and will use. depending on the color of the blossom and what's behind it. I take either poster board or the tri-fold board and change out the color with fabric. Dark green velvet also works well as a background for wild flowers when hiking. But, since I carry my medium sized diffuser with me when hiking, it's always there to use if needed.
JPinTenn, nice flowers! The first one is my favor... (show quote)


I quite often use white backgrounds but I have never tried using green. I am going to give it a try. Thanks for the comments.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 09:33:36   #
rpavich wrote:
Nice photos.

Here is how I create a black background even in bright sunlight!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEhaWtcdWdc


I have used this method several times and it works very well most of the time. The exposure normally requires some adjustment in ACR.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 09:22:16   #
Coker wrote:
Renee - I hear this alot from my students. There are really only two manufactures for serious photographers. Nikon and Canon. I love the D3100 Nikon and the Canon T1i, T2i and the T3i. The T1i is all you really need. I also enjoy the Tamron Lenses especially the 18-270 what a GREAT walk around lens. The pro glass from Tamron has been tested to be equal to the Canon and Nikon glass. It really depends on your budget. Smile


While most of what you say here is correct, Sony should not be omitted as a choice for serious photographers. Their DSLR's are consistently rated very high and they offer an excellent lens selection. Maybe Sony should have put "Minolta" on their DSLR's and "Sony" on their P&S cameras, then they would be taken more seriously as a quality choice. Having said all of that I am a dedicated Canon user.
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 14:26:58   #
renee wrote:
I just broke my camera. dropped it and bent lens. It is a Nikon 610. I paid about 400. 5 years ago. I would like one with a big screen at least 3 inch and a view finder beecause it is hard to see in bright sunlight. I would also like a fast shutter because I miss a lot of shots. Does anyone have any suggestions?
thanks Renee


Here's an excellent link to help you decide on a new camera:

http://cameras.about.com/od/buyingguide/a/Dslr-Buying-Guide.htm
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 14:17:27   #
renee wrote:
I just broke my camera. dropped it and bent lens. It is a Nikon 610. I paid about 400. 5 years ago. I would like one with a big screen at least 3 inch and a view finder beecause it is hard to see in bright sunlight. I would also like a fast shutter because I miss a lot of shots. Does anyone have any suggestions?
thanks Renee


You really did not say if you were looking for point & shoot or a DSLR. Depending upon your budget now would be a great time to go with an entry level DSLR. Canon, Nikon, and Sony are all excellent cameras. Just keep in mind that when going with a DSLR that it is a long term commitment to the brand because of the investment that you will have in the lenses. But, of course, in the future when you want to upgrade you will only have to purchase the body. Most of my Canon "L" lenses were purchased back when I was using an EOS 10S 35mm. They still serve me well on my Canon DSLR.
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 14:04:00   #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
looks like what you're doing works well.
I just put that out there for those who have the problem I encounter occasionally. If you can keep the light off of the black matte board it should be close to black.


When I use black mat board I use a large umbrella to block bright light. That works really well but some adjustment is still required in ACR.
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 13:50:32   #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I find that black velvet will greate a "black hole" as far as lighting goes. If matte board is used, I don't always get black. Nice flower shots BTW, love the last one.


Never tried black velvet. I will give that a shot. I always shoot in RAW and when I use black mat board I adjust the black in ACR.
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 11:46:36   #
I do quite a bit of flower photography adding black backgrounds. I sometimes add them in photoshop but also sometimes use a black piece of matboard behind the subject. I would like to hear about other techniques from those who enjoy this type of photography.

Japanese Anemone


Siberian Iris


Cabbage Butterfly on Dahlia

Go to
Feb 20, 2012 10:27:26   #
docrob wrote:
docrob wrote:
suzie123 wrote:
I shoot with a Canon 40D and use a 100mm lense for macro. I shoot handheld and alway have a nice soft effect to my photo which I like but, lately I have wanted to achieve the crisp, clean, max detail picture. What is the trick other then a tripod? Is it a photoshop thing, do I need a better quality lense, is it the aperture not open enough. Would appreciate any help. I will switch computers and send a picture along.


Well this is an easy one - suzie the subject itself is soft. Flowers are soft, they grow in gardens which also tend not to have sharp edges. Yes, of course, using a tripod helps get that really crisp edge and stopping down to F8 or F11 will help as well. But the primary reason your flower photographs are soft is the nature of THE subject.

In this thread, to illustrate sharpness - coins were used. Coins are not flowers - coins have hard defined edges, and ridges and flowers for the most part do not.
quote=suzie123 I shoot with a Canon 40D and use a... (show quote)
quote=docrob quote=suzie123 I shoot with a Canon... (show quote)


You are quite right about the general nature of flower photography. However, there are certain shots that you do want crisp edges such as the one below.

Hibiscus Bloom

Go to
Feb 20, 2012 08:49:20   #
suzie123 wrote:
I shoot with a Canon 40D and use a 100mm lense for macro. I shoot handheld and alway have a nice soft effect to my photo which I like but, lately I have wanted to achieve the crisp, clean, max detail picture. What is the trick other then a tripod? Is it a photoshop thing, do I need a better quality lense, is it the aperture not open enough. Would appreciate any help. I will switch computers and send a picture along.


In addition to your tripod use mirror lockup and a smaller f-stop. f8 should work well.
Go to
Feb 19, 2012 14:53:07   #
TimK5458 wrote:
traceyklotz wrote:
Ok still confused. I want to be able to edit my photos as in remove power wires, other objects, change backrounds, merge images etc. So do i need to buy photoshop or just get elements 10?


Tracy, go to this link and download the 30 day trial of Photoshop Elements 10. You can then see if it offers everything that you need. There is no obligation to buy it if you do not think it will do the job.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_elements&loc=en_us


Also there is a wonderful plugin for Photoshop and some other that does a good job of removing power lines. Be sure to read the installation file. I have used it many time and love it.

http://www.vicanek.de/plugins/wireworm.htm
quote=traceyklotz Ok still confused. I want to be... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 19, 2012 09:42:00   #
Fran wrote:
arphot wrote:
Fran wrote:
Download free 30 day trails of each. I decided on pse 10. It's on sae this weekend if you would rather buy than try the trial.


Fran . . . please let us know where the sale can be found. Thank you! :thumbup:


Hi. Check out cdw.com. Search for photoshop elements 10. 49.99 for the priemere version. I would copy the link but m not sure how to do that on my iPad.


Here's the cdw link:

http://www.cdw.com/shop/search/results.aspx?pCurrent=3&pPage=1&key=Adobe%20Photoshop%20Elements%2010&SortBy=PriceAsc&searchscope=All
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 468 469 470 471 472 473 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.