Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rkaminer
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18 next>>
Jul 5, 2021 18:12:23   #
I have google photos linked to my phone to auto upload the files. Sometimes it can take a long time (a couple of hours) because there is a pause to transfer the files. Not sure why and when that happens I try to force the transfer by opening the images on both sides. Eventually it gets done.
Go to
Jul 5, 2021 16:50:39   #
JohnBoy5562 wrote:
That will work but you do realize they are not full resolution I think they are only 2 mb. I would still put them on my pc or Mac to upload to the cloud.


I set the download to full resolution. You can choose either 2Mb or full res. Obviously it will take a little longer to download and the transfer to Google Photos, but it is worth the small time difference
Go to
Jul 5, 2021 16:24:31   #
I use Snapbridge all the time with my Z6 and found it to be reliable mostly using Bluetooth. When the images are download to my phone, they are also sent to Google photos for permanent archiving. Simple one-step way to transfer to Google Photos without taking out the XQD card or plugging the camera to a computer.

I can control the camera using it as a remote viewfinder and shutter release; very handy if the camera is on a tripod and I cannot stay by the camera.
Go to
Jun 17, 2021 08:41:47   #
Real Nikon Lover wrote:
Sadly as a paramedic I responded to a person who left their baby in a car seat sitting on top of the car roof and drove off. I will spare you the details. A vision that still haunts me.


I sadly also remember that baby left on top. It has happened more than once.
Go to
Jun 1, 2021 18:11:50   #
TriX wrote:
When it comes to servers, unless there’s a specific need to run a Windows server, the vast majority of my previous clients run virtualized (typically running VM) Linux machines. In fairness, I have seen one customer ever (NASCAR video productions) run Mac servers and storage. I have also seen one IB connected Mac HPC cluster built (at VA Tech) that was unsuccessful and replaced by a Linux cluster.


Servers are the domain of Microsoft and no Apple product will ever replace it. However in the consumer world Apple seems to be more dominant. Microsoft missed the boat by not having seamless devices; a few years ago they came out with a smartphone and was great (I owned one). Unfortunately for Microsoft very few people created apps and the ones that did, eventually stopped supporting them. The developers did not see any future to invest into the MS platform. Too bad because we only have two viable platforms and relatively very little competition; thus two giants control the smartphone landscape.
Go to
May 30, 2021 10:25:17   #
Longshadow wrote:
Uhhhh, a few? very few?


Good question, but have you ever tried to upgrade the RAM on a camera? That’s why we buy new cameras before the old one breaks.
Go to
May 29, 2021 19:06:58   #
TriX wrote:
Well, first of all, that’s a good reason to choose a desktop unless you need portability. But I have 2 Dell’s and a Lenovo Laptop working fine and being used daily. The Lenovo is a Thinkpad I5 with 8GB and SSD and 6 going on 7 years. It has a stack of photo aps on it. It’s light and plenty fast, but it wouldn’t be my first choice to stack 100 images. One Dell is an I5, 8GB that I updated the HD to SSD, and it’s 8-9 years old. I use both of these machines running Win 10 with multiple aps open every day, and they are by no means slow or limited. The last Dell is an old XP, 1GB machine that I use for a dedicated task (audio testing) - must be way over 10 years old. I turned it on several days ago to test a dbx expander, and it runs my audio test Ap just fine.

The net-net is I have no idea why you feel 4 years is the max life for a machine unless you never update your OS/drivers or are buying into a throw away and replace philosophy. I believe in buying the best cameras, cars, computers, tools, etc. that you can afford, maintaining them well and keeping them for a LONG time. For example, the 2006 Mercedes in my garage with 135K miles that I bought new (when I had a company car allowance) and maintained by the book looks and runs like the day I bought it. I have no intention of replacing it any time soon, if ever.
Well, first of all, that’s a good reason to choose... (show quote)


I am sure you can still use it today, only one little problem; no slide projectors available.
Go to
May 29, 2021 19:02:50   #
TriX wrote:
Well, first of all, that’s a good reason to choose a desktop unless you need portability. But I have 2 Dell’s and a Lenovo Laptop working fine and being used daily. The Lenovo is a Thinkpad I5 with 8GB and SSD and 6 going on 7 years. It has a stack of photo aps on it. One Dell is an I5, 8GB that I updated the HD to SSD, and it’s 8-9 years old. I use both of these machines running Win 10 with multiple aps open every day, and they are by no means slow or limited. The last Dell is an XP, 1GB machine that I use for a dedicated task (audio testing) - must be way over 10 years old. I turned it on several days ago to test a dbx expander, and it runs my audio test Ap just fine.

The net-net is I have no idea why you feel 4 years is the max life for a machine unless you never update your OS/drivers or are buying into a throw away and replace philosophy. I believe in buying the best cameras, cars, computers, tools, etc. that you can afford, maintaining them well and keeping them for a long time. For example the 2006 Mercedes in my garage with 135K miles that I bought new (when I had a company car allowance) and maintained by the book looks and runs like the day I bought it. I have no intention of replacing it any time soon, if ever.
Well, first of all, that’s a good reason to choose... (show quote)

When a device is used everyday for several hours a day, the equipment takes a beating. I am being careful, but the keyboard or just plain wear and tear will make the unit unreliable. I agree it can last longer, and many users like yourself are able to keep the equipment working, I am not so lucky; after about 4 years I feel I got my money's worth. However, I must confess that I have desktops, like the mini-Mac unit, longer than 4 years, just keep changing keyboards. As a side note, since technology changes drastically over the 4-year period, it is nice to have something that will work with all current software releases. That's what makes the world go around and makes Apple one of the biggest companies on the planet.
Go to
May 29, 2021 18:13:09   #
TriX wrote:
That’s one approach, but not the only valid one. My I7 desktop was assembled (by me) in 2012. I bought the fastest CPU I could afford, 16 GB, a fast video card, decent sized power supply and all SSD storage. 9 years later, other than updating the monitor, the only thing I’ve done is add another 16GB of memory when I got another camera that produced big files and some more SSD. It boots in 10-15 sec and runs 8-10 applications including PS and a dozen windows open in the browser simultaneously and I NEVER wait for the machine. When it gets too slow, I’ll update the MB and CPU and possibly the memory (DDR3 to DDR4 or 5), but everything else will stay the same. Now THAT is the way to have good computing power for many years at minimum cost.
That’s one approach, but not the only valid one. M... (show quote)


Try that same technique with a laptop. After 9 years, it will not even qualify for a paperweight.
Go to
May 29, 2021 16:08:58   #
[quote=hrblaine]
Hip Coyote wrote:


The hardware upgrades on Mac were very expensive.

As I've posted, I started with a Lisa a long time ago. Macintosh always were overpriced (IMO) and always behind Windows machines in development so when my employer stopped paying the freight, I switched to Windows when I retired. Cheaper and better, I thought which is why I switched and I've never regretted it. Harry (on an HP Pavillion laptop even as we speak.)


Who needs upgrades? Get the best you can afford and by the time you need to upgrade, you are better off buying a new machine. The old one will be too old anyway and not worth to upgrade; false economy to buy something that will need to be upgraded later. I keep my laptop for about 4 years and then get a new one, solves the upgrade problem.
Go to
May 29, 2021 13:49:50   #
I was a PC user for a long time and switched to MAC about 10 years ago. Why? Because at that time the MAC OS was simpler to use and the WIN hardware was terrible; such as poor screens. The MAC hardware was superb in comparison to any Microsoft OS laptops then. With a MAC, it was easier to set up a printer and move files around. Much of those advantages became blurred with the WIN 10 OS introduction; however I stayed with the MAC because of the seamless use between all their devices, such as phones, desktop and laptops. Some people object to the Apple ecosystem but I find it much easier to work with. Years ago, the photo and video software had a better performance on a MAC, again this difference is no longer the case. Most applications work seamlessly between both systems, with few exceptions; unless you have to use a Windows exclusive software, there is no difference. It comes down to hardware selection and price. Similar hardware configuration will perform the same on both.
Go to
May 11, 2021 20:06:09   #
Since money is no object, always buy the brand name of the camera; that's why they cost more. People feel more comfortable with the same brand of lens and camera. I think the QC and electronic compatibility is greater in the branded lens. Now, if money is an object, then i would go for the less expensive one since both are great lenses.
Go to
May 8, 2021 20:07:03   #
Micro SD card used to be bit slower and usually do not have the maximum storage capacity of the full size ones. Although, these spec differences have been shrinking over the past couple of years. However, a micro SD and full size SD with the same specs have identical performances. it is true that the adaptor introduces another point of contact and therefore potential failure, but this risk is miniscule. From a practical point, if you have micro-SD cards use them; there is no difference, except for its size of course.
Go to
May 2, 2021 14:05:54   #
JohnBoy5562 wrote:
Thank, that’s good to know. I have a Sony XQD card but always used the cable that came with the camera to import my photos. But now I’m thinking of getting the a new iMac. I have a 2015 iMac now and wanted to know do they make a cable adapter or a USB 3 cable that will work with the Nikon D850 or should I buy a card reader? Thanks in advance.

I have Sony XQD reader and had trouble with a direct C connector cable into the Mac Pro. I only got it to work with the USBa cable and a C adaptor. Weird but I could not argue with success; I think it had something to do with powering the Sony adaptor. Get an A female to C to adaptor and plug into the Mac Pro and life will be beautiful again.
Go to
Apr 28, 2021 17:48:47   #
mikeroetex wrote:
Since you are so-o-o disappointed in the Z6 (and I do know what I am talking about, since I have owned a Z6 and Z7 longer than you knew they existed) ... why don't you just send it back, get a refund and quit whining like a baby? Or do you just prefer to stay an ignorant horse's ass that cannot read a manual, much less a forum thread?


Who said I was disappointed? I am not, and I am keeping my Z6. As a matter of fact, I am buying another Z6ii or Z9 if they come out soon.

BTW, I owned this one since October 2018; is that long enough?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.