Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ggttc
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 330 next>>
Dec 4, 2022 10:02:21   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
My Quick Try


Thanks. It colorized pretty nice.
Go to
Dec 2, 2022 18:41:46   #
Thanks you! Much better than when i tried
Go to
Dec 2, 2022 18:40:37   #
Wow! Thanks!

Now can you fix that stupid expression on my face!!!
Go to
Dec 2, 2022 07:35:44   #
Delderby wrote:
The greatest photographers don't need Photoshop.


Amstel Adams would manipulate animage in his darkroom for weeks to make his final images.
Go to
Dec 1, 2022 12:19:57   #
This picture is 40 years old and was just sent to me by my old fishing buddy from Montan as a reminder of how stupid we were. Mistakes were made here

Any help

Thanks


(Download)
Go to
Oct 3, 2022 19:16:46   #
Canisdirus wrote:
I'm glad you understand companies need to make a profit...progress in todays world.

They examine it all very carefully...believe me.

If they think the best way to keep sales or improve it by shrinking slightly...that's what they will do.

They know the psychology of their market better than we do...that's for sure.


Please check the profits of Tyson, one if the largest suppliers of meat you buy at the grocery store. Profits are up over 40% from same quarter 2021 vs 2022..is that caused by inflation?
Go to
Aug 22, 2022 10:13:58   #
Post-processing is part of the photographic process. I think you'll find few top-flight photographers who don't use it.
Secondly, "SOOC" photographers act as if they should get a merit badge for only using half the tools.

Granted, you could by pass sharpening on a static subject, but if you're trying to shoot a plane at 300mph at 1/190 to get prop blur, intuitive sharpening is a great tool
Go to
Aug 22, 2022 10:04:22   #
First of all, post-processing is part of the photographic process. Please name a great photographer who didn't use post-processing. "SOOC" is like "I only shoot manual" ... as if you get a special merit badge.

For static subjects, you could not sharpen and it will work, but if you're shooting a plane moving at 200 mph and trying to maintain prop blur at 1/180 intuitive sharpening is a great tool
Go to
Aug 18, 2022 13:44:30   #
Fotoartist wrote:
I have never been happy with my full body shots of gorillas. Their 'humanity' only comes out in closeups where you can see their eyes in detail. And their eyes are very dark and hard to see from a distance. This is a 500mm shot of a Silverback from the Detroit Zoo.


I agree. Chimps are one of my favorite zoo subjects and facial close ups with focus on the eyes make for the most memerable shots. I have an 850 and take full advantage of the pixels.

On a lens note I would look at the Tamron 100-400. Not fast but very sharp and lightweight.
Go to
Aug 4, 2022 08:38:56   #
Nice
Go to
Jul 29, 2022 09:38:09   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Success is the photographer. Failure is the equipment.


So very true.
Go to
Jul 14, 2022 21:00:48   #
ken_stern wrote:
Yet another vote for --

Who Cares!!


Count me in!
Go to
Jun 17, 2022 09:06:36   #
I guest it worked for some people
"In 18th-century Europe, surgeons continued to use bloodletting as a treatment for fever, hypertension (high blood pressure), inflammation of the lungs, and pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lungs). Some physicians had even wider uses for this allegedly therapeutic method."
Go to
Jun 16, 2022 21:13:45   #
I've used ivermectin on horses for years. If you saw the results you wouldnt want any part of this stuff.
Go to
Jun 16, 2022 07:58:10   #
Love this.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 330 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.