Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PeterBergh
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 next>>
Dec 8, 2018 09:41:46   #
rmalarz wrote:
Peter, I'd lean towards the black and white. However, processing is needed to reveal the beautiful textures that are hinted in these presented.
--Bob


THX. I am working on it.
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 09:35:53   #
Rolk wrote:
Peter, I'm flattered that you liked my edit, and as a courtesy to you,
I didn't post my edit because it's your topic. But now that you've given
permission, I'm happy to share it.

I use several different programs for post processing; Canon Digital Photo Professional 4 for importing RAW files and doing initial "tweaks,"
Photoshop Elements 2019, usually for creating special effects or add layers, and believe it or not, Apple Photo which used to be iPhoto. It's
a great little program that quite honestly offers more of those "tweaks" that I used on your image.

The first thing I did was decrease the exposure by -0.29, then increased the highlights +0.46, decreased shadows -.023, decreased
brightness -0.19 and just increased contrast by +0.07.

As you can see, no major adjustments....just little "tweaks" that, when combined, bring out more detail and texture.

That said, when it comes to converting a color image to B&W, I'm really terrible, so if anyone can take this image
and do a respectable conversion, with Peter's blessing, please go for it. I know I could never do a B&W justice.
Tim
Peter, I'm flattered that you liked my edit, and a... (show quote)


Thanks for posting
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 18:08:59   #
I have several of the 1TB Samsung T5s and am very pleased. Yes, they are formatted in exFAT so that they are usable both on Windows machines and on MACs. Since I only use Windows, I immediately reformatted them as NTFS. Warning: when I tried a Quick Format, the formatting hung. If you want to reformat them under Windows, use full format, not quick format.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 18:03:32   #
AzPicLady wrote:
The OP said to ignore the exposure while choosing. Unfortunately, I could not do that. so I ran both of them through some basic LR adjustments to come up with what I thought might be more pleasing images in both the colour and B&W. Of course, that was pleasing TO ME and might not be to either the OP or others. Once that was done, I actually liked the B&W better. The yellows can be adjusted to varying tones of grey which are quite pleasing. And the darks can be taken down to where there is a lot of contrast in the B&W - more so than in the colour version. There is detail in that foreground section that looks blown out, and that helps a lot. The colour version had a sallow look (of course! It's yellow!) that was somehow not nearly as pleasing as the B&W. And I love yellow! I played a bit with the tone of the yellow and that helped a little. But overall, I thought the B&W was a more interesting look.
The OP said to ignore the exposure while choosing.... (show quote)


THX
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 18:02:06   #
I particularly like the first one. It was a good idea to let the reflection take more space than the trees.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:59:16   #
The light when you took the picture is what makes the shot. Good catch.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:47:41   #
John Howard wrote:
... If I use a single point exposure metering, and measure the bright spot in a composition (say a bright cloud), the camera will try to produce that cloud as gray. So I need to (one method) use the exposure compensation in Aperture mode to raise the exposure about 3 stops so the cloud is white as it appears. ...


Let us, for simplicity, assume my camera has a dynamic range of 10 stops. The way I do it is to single-point meter the bright spot and then decide just how bright I want that bright spot to be. If I want it to be blank white, I would raise the exposure recommended by the meter by five stops (the meter reading recommends an exposure to make the bright spot middle grey). If I want some detail in the bright spot, I would raise the meter-recommended exposure by anything from two to four stops, depending on how much detail I want in the bright spot. I would also meter the dark areas to make sure I don't lose too much detail in them. BTW, this is Zone-System reasoning. This line of reasoning makes it unnecessary to worry about blinkies.

If I want full detail in both shadows and highlights and the brightness range of my subject is greater than my camera can handle, my only choice is to use HDR.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:25:42   #
The light on the third one is very good.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:24:43   #
[quote=markngolf]That's easy, Bill!! Forever, unless you remove it.
Mark

[quote=Bill_de]I thought the question was going to be how long you could keep pancake batter in the fridge. I really wanted the answer to that one.

--[/quote[/quote]

The only problem with keeping anything in the fridge too long is that things tend to grow microscopic life forms.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:22:07   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
I tried that myself, just out of curiosity. They add scale IMO, but a treeless image is also very effective with the limited colors and the story being more about just shapes and light.


And photography really is all about shapes and light! It's my personal belief that a photograph does not need indications of scale or depth.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:12:31   #
Flickwet wrote:
I have GAS ...


I see no reason for you to have GAS; the beautiful pictures you posted tell me that your present equipment more than suffices. Basically, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 17:06:15   #
I have had an EOS R for a couple of months and I am very pleased with it. Somebody mentioned that it "eats" batteries. For me, that is not a problem, since I make maybe 50 exposures on a successful outing. Since I don't shoot video, it does not worry me that the video is cropped. For me, it has produced some very good images with the kit lens (24-105 F4L) -- the only RF lens I have. Since I don't shoot for clients, the lonesome card slot does not bother me, either.

BTW and FWIW, Canon Rumors mentioned that a 75 MP EOS R is in the works. They mentioned a release time of the second half of 2019.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 16:54:46   #
It's a beautiful image. As I see it, the main interest is in the clouds and the mountains. Thus, I think it would benefit from cropping a bit at the bottom.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 11:26:06   #
Rolk wrote:
Longshadow, by playing around with the exposure, highlights
and shadows, this is an amazing image. I gravitate to bold colors
but the muted pastels in this rock formation are gorgeous.

I'll pm you what I came up with.
Tim


Thanks for the kind opinion. I much appreciate the edit you made. Why don't you post it so that people can see an alternative interpretation? (I am still working on bringing out the details that your edit so successfully brought out.)
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 11:09:25   #
Just Fred wrote:
Nice job in masking out the cars. Two things I would offer: 1) The top of the rock line is cut off; I think it would be better to show the peak, 2) I think you've overdone the shadow on top of the rocks.

Just my $.00002


I disagree about the shadows. I think the deep shadows add drama.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.