Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Pumble
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
Aug 4, 2020 15:42:49   #
GreenReaper wrote:
while back, somebody had mentioned a colorization program called "Codijy'. Well, I went in search of it, and it does a great job.


Those are absolutely fantastic. Like other's, I've already looked up the software and may try the trial, if for nothing else, to learn something new. You have to love this forum, always sharing and learning...
Go to
Jul 27, 2020 12:14:01   #
Nice catch looks well maintained. You have to wonder if there is a five cent glass bottle coke machine inside!!
Go to
Jul 27, 2020 07:59:17   #
MWojton wrote:
In late August, I will have one day to spend at the GC. Where and at what times are recommended for photography?
And, while I'm asking, any recommendations for Sedona would be great.

Thank you


I did both last year but spent a whole day in Sedona and the rest of the whole week in GC. Although the Pink Jeep tour we did was really nice, doing that in Sedona and then making the trek to GC, you'll spend more time riding in a vehicle than you will be enjoying the sights. Keep in mind the tours are always 2-3 hours all in and the time from Sedona to GC is some 2 hours. Given only one day, how much will you really enjoy the sights?

In the GC, Paul is right, Go near the Angel Bright Lodge, the sights on that side of the south rim are amazing. The weather is a factor, so is the smoke from any nearby brush fires burning. I have shots with this cool haze on them, albeit it looks foggy, it is the low lying smoke from the fires that were burning.

We also did a Helicopter ride https://www.papillon.com/?ref=0000 It was just unbelievable. again, 3 hours.

If you have the time and want to do something really special again another 1-2 hour ride, take a photo tour of the slot canyons. They have tours that are limited to photographers, and you must have a DSLR or Mirrorless with tripod to go on it. One photog will enable your family or loved ones to also go. This keeps out the cell phone snappers and they unreal with helping set up shots and taking you places others are not allowed to go. Unfortunately it appears they've closed due to the virus, who knows if they'll be open when you get there. Worth a call. https://www.navajoantelopecanyon.com/Photo.html

In any event, the other thing you might take advantage of is the dark sky in the GC to do some Milky Way shots at night. In short its an all day affair, from day break to after dark.

Be really careful about where you are, some are killed falling over the edge trying to get that best selfie. There's no hand rails to keep you confined. When we were there, the news reported that someone had just done this. I happened to see a Ranger giving a class about the history of the canyon and asked him how many people actually do that. We learned that 6-7 people a year go over edge from loss of situational awareness (selfies). They said another 5-7 jump and another 10-12 have the big cardiac arrest. Bring tons of water, get a hydro pack if you're going to do some hiking. Although my wife teased me, I filled mine with Lemonade and tons of ice and was able to go all day. She had boring lukewarm water. I took a picture of my dash to memorize the fact that in August 2019 it was 111 degrees when we got there.

In short, there is so much to do there you will not realize how fast the time went. It's been a year and I still haven't processed my pictures, I have so many that SOOC look amazing. Go on youtube and look for videos about the Grand Canyon, there are some real good personal ones among the silly ones. I'd go back in a heartbeat as I don't think we saw everything. I'd like to go to the North Rim in the fall for some snow and more winter scenes.



Go to
Jul 22, 2020 10:41:50   #
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
We could get into the development costs and volume of sales but I doubt it would change either of our opinions. I guess the real gift is to live in a world with so many choices... Happy shooting!


Thanks for the reply. You're right I doubt it would change my opinion unless you tell me they lower the margin on the camera body to encourage sales and try to make up the differential on the accessories. But then again, the 3rd party aftermarket houses have design and volume issues to manage too.

I agree with you that we are so fortunate to have the gift of choice. Same to you, enjoy our wonderful craft.
Go to
Jul 22, 2020 10:29:02   #
CPW wrote:
Hi Pumble,

After another reader alerted me to your post here, I found your inquiry from yesterday afternoon and can confirm we quoted you a price of $139 (as advertised on our site) for a brand new Canon BG-E22 battery grip sold by an authorized Canon dealer, free shipped to your door, with no sales tax, and a 1-year Canon USA warranty.

I'm not sure where you saw that "new price of $179" ... it was definitely not in our reply.

Regarding the out-of-country comment: yes, occasionally our street prices can take advantage of the unique situation where both Canon Canada and Canon USA supply the same product (with the same warranty valid in both countries). When there are currency fluctuations, the pricing imbalances create great opportunities for savings. If you're not comfortable with this, please stick with the great USA authorized dealer options we offer.

I hope this clarifies things.

Best regards,
Gordon of CPW
Hi Pumble, br br After another reader alerted me ... (show quote)


As I reviewed, the next cheapest price in the original link from your site was a Canadian dealer for $179, I seem to have wrongly assumed it was the same place as they're both in Canada.

In the response, without revealing the vendor, you wrote "please reply and provide your name, phone number, and billing/shipping address. I would forward this information to the store to get your order started, and let you know who the dealer is at that time. Your transaction would be directly with the store..." You also noted that it is brand new and "They are a reputable dealer (the source of several of our group buys and deals)." IMHO and I may be wrong, there's something amiss when this price for a new product can't be found anywhere else and the foreign vendor name has to be hidden. CPW must earn a commission on the referral, otherwise I can't imagine what's in this for CPW?

In the end, it raises alarms of concern with today's multiple methods of phishing information for nefarious purposes. Maybe this is liegit, and it maybe ok for others to deal this way, but I'm not comfortable with this model.
Go to
Jul 22, 2020 07:46:24   #
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
I always laugh when people suggest that huge profits are being made off of OEM grips and long lens replacement hoods.

I also thought one of the advantages of mirrorless was smaller and lighter...


I'm always glad to be a source of fun. But in reality you couldn't tell the difference in these products here other than lining the OEM pocket with extra cash. Having owned the $79 version, seems to me that the $130 isn't in the quality of the plastic, so not sure why there is such a difference other than a huge profit. It isn't like Canon is making these in the US...

$79.95 - https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1116606-REG/vello_bg_c12_battery_grip_for.html?sts=pi&pim=Y

$209 - https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081811-REG/canon_9130b001_bg_e16_battery_grip_for.html

I didn't buy mirrorless for weight or size, I bought it because it's the emerging technology, it fit my needs and it was the right price to enter the FF genre. Canon has a grip for the R, but it's $250. Notably they have one for the new R5 too, but it's $350. The accessory market is sure to beat that price by at least $100. Can't speak to lens hoods but my guess is like anything in the accessory market and a similar pricing differential.

Go to
Jul 22, 2020 07:32:54   #
Haydon wrote:
From a 10 second google search.

Canon BG-E22 Battery Grip $139.99 "brand new".

https://www.cpricewatch.com/product/06723/Canon-BG-E22-Battery-Grip-price.html?streetprice


Thanks, but in another 20 second look into the URL shows that the $140 price is a scam. You fill out a form and the response is a new price of $179. You look closer and its from an authorized dealer on ebay who lives out of the country. The other ebay prices are typically grey market, not that those may be bad but I don't want to have a controversy on a product like this. Caveat emptor. If I'm going to give money away to unknown scams, I'd rather just donate it to a charity.
Go to
Jul 21, 2020 14:04:59   #
amfoto1 wrote:
The $249 Canon BG-E22 grip for the EOS R has far more functionality than the Vello BG-C18 for the EOS RP (which Canon doesn't offer a grip for)

Look at the BG-E22 and you'll find a full set of controls for use when holding the camera vertically. The EOS R and the Canon grip for it "communicate" via a bunch of additional contacts.

The EOS RP isn't designed to accommodate a grip. The camera itself doesn't have any of the necessary electronic contacts. As a result, the Vello grip for it only has a single control.... a shutter release button. AND, to utilize that an external wire using a mini RCA plug needs to be connected from the grip to the camera's remote release socket. The Vello grip lacks any other controls, so is a lot cheaper to make and sells for only $58. They probably just slightly modified a grip they were already making for some other Canon camera that uses the same battery as the RP (LP-E17?). I've noticed some other 3rd party grips made this way for cameras that aren't designed to accommodate a grip... with only a shutter release button and the rather clumsy external wire that might be all too easily unplugged by accident.

There have been "issues" with 3rd party grips. I've always avoided them and just "paid the price" for the OEM Canon grips and, over they years, used them with over a dozen different DSLRs

With one exception Canon OEM grips have worked flawlessly. The only one that didn't... the very early BG-E2 originally sold with the 20D... simply would lose contact with the camera occasionally, when it loosened slightly. Once I knew what was happening with it, all that was needed was a quick re-tightening of the grip. Latter production of the BG-E2 solved the problem... it only occurred with early production, below a certain serial number.

I've heard far more problems that seemed to trace back to issues with the less well designed and poorly made 3rd party grips. Those problems have been everything from rapid battery drain to early failures of controls to causing the camera to throw off an error code to poor fit and more. No thanks!

BTW, I am also careful about 3rd party batteries. Until recently, there hasn't been a cheaper 3rd party replacement for Canon LP-E17. But I see one is coming soon. What I haven't been able to find out is if those are like some other 3rd party batteries, incompatible with the Canon chargers (and vice versa). For example, the Canon LP-E6/E6N has been widely copied by 3rd party "clones". BUT those must never be charged in the Canon OEM chargers and don't give full status "info" in the cameras.... Except for one offered by Watson, who seem to have figured out a way to emulate the firmware in OEM battery, which makes their #B-1544-2 work identically to the Canon LP-E6/E6N (don't yet know if there is the same cross-compatibility with the new LP-E6NH).
The $249 Canon BG-E22 grip for the EOS R has far m... (show quote)


Thanks for the reply. While I heard of issues with 3rd party grips, the cost difference is a huge incentive to try them. The Vello one you describe is clearly not worth it, sounds like simply a piece of plastic molded for the bottom. I had a Meike grip for my 7D MkII and it had the joystick, every button, and the thumbwheel on it. It also sported a 2ghz wireless shutter trigger. All for less than $75 and it worked perfectly. https://meikeglobal.com/products/meike-mk-7d2-professional-battery-grip-for-canon-eos-7d2-7d-mark-ii-dslr-cameras-as-bg-e16

Hence, I suspect there is a huge profit made on an OEM grip. I also notice that used Canon grips for the R are simply not available, I suspect when one is available, it's sold right away, others looking to save on them just like me. Just wasn't sure if anyone heard of a cheaper solution.
Go to
Jul 21, 2020 10:50:43   #
I've enjoyed using a grip on my last two cameras, a D50, and then a 7D MkII. I've always looked to the 3rd party accessory market to save some money on accessories, especially grips. I recall paying some $75 for a Vello grip for the 7D MkII v the Canon grip being over $200. I've reasoned there's no real tech in the grip, they both hold two batteries and have the same button functionality.

I bought the EOS-R last year and really enjoy using the camera, the pictures it produces are unreal. At the same time, I am amazed that there does not appear to be anyone making a grip for it other than Canon. Vello has one for the EOS-RP but not the EOS-R. I get that they need to recover the cost of making a mold, but I bet there are a lot of EOS-Rs in the market. I am confident there will be 3rd party grips available for the R5 and R6. Anyone know why there's nothing for EOS-R?
Go to
Jul 14, 2020 14:06:15   #
Samdog wrote:
Hey Folks!

I have years of b/w and color negatives, and I'd like to digitize the images. I've researched various scanners and can't make up my mind.


I really miss my HP Photosmart S20, it used to do a great job for negatives and prints. I still have it but the last OS they wrote a Twain driver for was XP. It's a no go on Windows 10. Sometimes progress is a setback.
Go to
Jul 10, 2020 11:20:15   #
joer wrote:
The new EOS R5 looks to be Canon's Sony killer...its specs are awesome.

It will be interesting to see what Sony counters with. Love competition...we all benefit sooner or latter.



Waiting to see someone comment on the R6 sensor spec - 20 MP?? The R5 sensor spec is 45MP ????? Even the EOS-R and 5D MkIV is 31 MP.

I don't get the reasoning for the sensor spec. Thoughts??
Go to
Jun 19, 2020 16:03:26   #
tca2267 wrote:
Do a lot of you use a "battery grip?"

What is th advantage of a battery grip?


I enjoy using a grip, for me it's just easier to hold the camera for a portrait orientation. I always had a Vello and enjoyed that they embedded a wireless shutter trigger into the model I had for my Canon 7D MKII.

Oddly enough though the only grip available for my EOS-R is the overpriced Canon one. I've waited and waited for Vello or anyone else to make one, but even though the camera has been out for over a year now, there's nothing on the horizon for it. I find that strange.
Go to
Jun 18, 2020 07:48:10   #
billnikon wrote:
Your post is a joke. You think Amazon did not have lawyers looking at it before proceeding with there action.


Albeit growing into a monster that some day will likely has restraints placed on it as we socialize everything, Amazon is nothing more than a multi-faceted business that in one instance hosts a website and invites others to sell their wares on it. BTW Walmart does the same thing, but the connotation of buying a EOS 5R there might not be the greatest. ie You don't find the same class of customer who want to buy a Porsche or Lamborghini Aventador at a Chevy truck dealer...

Keep in mind, its a side service that Amazon offers fulfillment and warehousing of the materials. A seller doesn't have to buy those services, but again most buyers look for the "fulfilled by Amazon" to have some assurance they're going to get their order.

For those sellers that enjoy these fulfillment services, they are subject to the Ts&Cs when they clicked "I Agree" on to get past that screen. The question is whether or not the "seller" ever really read them. Like installing a software package, most never read the terms or conditions of what they're doing, but rather consider it a general annoyance to have to hit "I Agree".

It may be Canon reached a deal with Amazon to protect and stop diluting its own authorized agents' sales, ie B&H, Adorama and the like. They likely paid Amazon a fee to "qualify" authorized sellers. Nothing but money grubbing business deals abound here.

Keep in mind, no one forces you to use Amazon and you can sell Canon products on the net if you want, just create your own website and sell like BH and others, including Amazon who built their business on a specific model and offered lower pricing and good service to attract people to the website. Now that they've grown, we're seemingly upset with their success. Remember how Amazon started, they were the online seller of books for Borders at least 25 years ago.

There is no restraint of trade here, it's just a manufacturer controlling their distribution channels. It sounds as though the emotion should be directed to Canon, not Amazon. Start a website and let us know in 25 years if you've reached 1/2 their size. I wasn't smart enough to buy Amazon stock either, but sure wish I had...
Go to
Jun 11, 2020 13:30:54   #
dayranch wrote:
I am looking for a online digital photo company that prints high quality photos from sizes wallet to 8x10, my go to place had been my local drug store are walmart, but in the last year are so, the quality of their printing had gone down hill, in the last 6 months most photos I had printed was off by some bit in technical setting.If some one can recommend online digital printing company, I will be grateful and thankful. Thanks to all.


Kinda surprised not to see Shutterfly as one listed. My picks are Printique by Adorama and Bay Photo.

I am intrigued with the others listed and will have to give them a look see. Is anyone selling prints from these entities or just using them for personal pics?
Go to
Jun 5, 2020 07:52:23   #
billnikon wrote:
Eneloop batteries hold their charge for a really long time. These are the only rechargeable batteries I use now. I also use the Panasonic chargers.


But to all - what version Eneloop are you using? Amazon has a White version, a Black version labeled Eneloop Pro, and a new Red version. The description for the Pro version says can be recharged only 500 times, the White 2000 times and the "new" Red version 2100 times. I must believe the ampacity is also different, but just curious what version you all are using.

Dave
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.