Murphy the dog thinks he is good but he has only won twice out of 9 games!!!
It is very important to understand that the ISO is "added" after the photo is taken, after the shutter is opened and closed and after the light has already hit the sensor. Back in the old days of films there was ASA which indicated how sensitive the film was and therefore how much light was needed for a "normal exposure". That is different from ISO. When you take a photo at f5.6 and 1/100 of a second a given amount of light hits the sensor. That amount of light has nothing whatever to do with the ISO setting. The inner workings of the camera then amplify the output of the sensor if, for instance, you had the ISO set to 1600 instead of 200. But it took the photo at the original ISO. While there is a slight difference, there is not a great deal of difference between taking the photo with an ISO of 1600 which is a 4 atop increase and printing it and putting the 100 ISO photo in your computer and "upping" the exposure "or brightness" 4 stops. Some difference but in terms of lighting virtually the same.
I fully understand that this is not to everyone’s taste and may look over cooked but that is what is fun about photography, I like it. I’ve also Attached the original. It amazes me what changes you can make using snapseed on the iPhone.
I have gone from 2 full frame cameras, one Nikon, one Canon, approx. 8 apsc cameras all with quality lenses, and finally went with an Olympus em-1 m2 with the 12-40 f2.8 and the 40-150 f2.8 ( I think) and got rid of both of those superb lenses and got the "pro" 12-100 f4.0 lens. I now have a very compact system that is limited only by my abilities. I have printed 24X36 photos that are tack sharp and I don't carry all that stuff with me. Granted I don't get as much Bokeh as the ff cameras but usually I am not looking for that and frankly I can add some of that in post to satisfy my needs. em1 m2 with 12-100 f4.0. Can't think of a better combination.
I may be wrong but I believe the copilot had 200 hours total, not "in type". Remember, EVERY PILOT OF EVERY PLANE INITIALLY HAS ONE HOUR IN TYPE" but hopefully there is a captain with 3000 hours in type. EVERY 737 captain has gone through 200 in type. You can't get to more than 200 hours "in type" until you pass the 200 mark. But 200 hours "in total" is absolutely insane. Quite a number of Cessna 172 and 152 pilots have more than 200 hours "in total". But training conquers all. I would fly on a 737 max 8 if the crew had the latest updated training.
It's not perfect but it is new. It will get better over time and as of the current time I am very impressed!
In my very uninformed opinion absolutely unbelievable. This is a website that is free that uses artificial intelligence to colorize a black-and-white photo.
https://colourise.sg
This is just a screenshot taken from an old photo on my iPhone And this is how it colorized it. Not perfect but I am duly impressed
A good pilot always make sure that the ailerons Are moving in the proper direction when the wheel is turned. He is getting Ready for his first solo and he’s just checking things out. Shot with an iPhone and processed with Snapseed in the back of a car
Em-1m2 and adjusted in Snapseed on an iPhone in the backseat of the car
Forget the photo itself and the fact that there are branches sticking up all over the place and disregard the halos—-
I still think that it is amazing that you can make these changes to an iPhone photo just sitting on the couch with your iPhone.
Original
Snapseed
No problem. One thing I tend to do is overdo the HDR and people look at the photo and can't really state why it doesn't look right but it just doesn't look right. So just a touch. Also if you go online and check some really good videos on snapseedt you can apply the HDR just to certain areas. I didn't know that until about two weeks ago which is really cool. Other than not having layers I don't see any reason not to use it for all my processing. Send some photos that you worked on. If you have a MacBook Pro with the pencil it is just perfect. Ray Seligman
I basically did what i usually do. I went to the first editing tool and adjusted shadows highlights, exposure etc. until I got it pretty much the way I wanted it. Then I used a blur to blur out the background a little bit. But the shirt came out that way when I did the final step which I usually do is I went to the HDR effect and added just a little bit of HDR. If you add too much you can make it look like a cartoon. But if you add just a few percent I think it brings out the texture in things like clothing. Try it and see what you think.
Took this in a rather unlit area with an olympus E-m1ii but processed it on my iPhone using snapseed. Overcooked but considering it was done on my phone in my car while riding as a passenger I'm satisfied.
Original vs snapseed
So A photographer was taking engagement photos of my daughter and her fiancé on her fancy camera and my daughter asked her to take one with her iPhone which she sent to me. It is the first one and I received it while driving from New Jersey to New York (in the passenger seat) and she asked me to “work on it“. I grant you I blew it on the left side where the garbage can was but for a teeny iPhone and my big fat thumbs and a bumpy car ride it is amazing what this little phone can do.