Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: RON 11
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Sep 11, 2014 08:32:40   #
Nikon DF.
Go to
Sep 7, 2014 19:20:03   #
Uuglypher wrote:
Given that I've fought the "glare vs, non-glare" battle for a long time, I finally decided to abjure any glass with fine art prints. Four years ago I mounted an entire show as float mounts, and will never mat, glaze, and frame another print. The public specifically commented on and liked the float mount technique and several purchases were not simply for rolled prints, but specifically for float mounted prints.
I've no intent to hi-jack your thread in favor of float mounts, but for solving the glare problem they can't be beat...and they are considerably less expensive than the traditional mat/glazed/framed presentation.
Are there places that will mount your own printed photos this way?
Dave in SD
Given that I've fought the "glare vs, non-gla... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 7, 2014 09:48:43   #
What I had to do was export them with the largest file size I could muster, 16 bit TIFF to my desktop and burn file onto cd and mail it to recipient. A simpler method is to just have them sign up to dropbox.
Go to
Sep 7, 2014 09:24:06   #
A step down in price from Museum glass is Conservation glass. That can save you a considerable amount and still protect your print from harmful UV light.
Go to
Sep 6, 2014 11:12:23   #
Aperture. It has everything I need and nothing that I don't need. I did add Tonality to better process black and whites.
Go to
Aug 12, 2014 19:24:22   #
You might be better served with the 35mm 1.8G. Will work great with any DX body that you have. The 50mm 1.8G would be my second choice.
Go to
Aug 3, 2014 10:16:16   #
I very much like the screen on my IMac 21". The color is dead on and works well with my Canon 9500 Mark II to give me prints that match what I see on the screen.
Go to
Jul 21, 2014 17:30:44   #
I have the the 16-85 because i do need that wider focal length but if I did not, the 24-120 would be my hands down other choice. Use to own one and found it to be extremely versatile.
Go to
Jul 20, 2014 11:00:33   #
Apple still has some tutorial apps for Aperture on it's App Store. I use Aperture exclusively and will continue to do so for as long as possible. Just because Apple will no longer upgrade it does not mean it' going away. You will still be able to use it if itS on your computer. Aperture does everything I need an editor to do, so I am not about to switch.
Go to
Jul 20, 2014 10:52:49   #
Yes it is.
Go to
Jul 11, 2014 16:56:28   #
16-85 is a definite lens to consider. I think of it as the best dx walkabout lens. If you are thinking of moving to fx anytime soon then consider the 24-120 f4
Go to
Jul 7, 2014 17:19:59   #
I use Ilford Gold Fiber Silk when printing on my 9500. Very much like the results. It may also be necessary to show your print under museum grade glass to get more sheen to the finished product. I myself, use conservation glass as I do not favor a high sheen.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 09:25:46   #
Both the Carnegie Museum and the Frick Museum are worth a look see. When you get closer to a date let me know and I might be able to join you.
Go to
Jun 24, 2014 07:55:52   #
I use Ilford Gold Fibre and love it. That being said, Canon has some good papers also. Luster, for instance and you can probably get best results with their papers. I have downloaded Ilford's ICC files, but it was a hassle.
Go to
Jun 24, 2014 07:55:52   #
I use Ilford Gold Fibre and love it. That being said, Canon has some good papers also. Luster, for instance and you can probably get best results with their papers. I have downloaded Ilford's ICC files, but it was a hassle.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.