Posts: JP/Avery | Ugly Hedgehog

A lens or a teleconverter

I use a canon 100-400mm l series lense on a 7d which brings it to about 550 ruthly.

Feb 7, 2014 13:21:50 #

But canon do a 8-15mm l series ef lense(full frame);)

Feb 7, 2014 13:15:47 #

[Sorry but at that i had a sigma 10-30 n it mounted on my 1dsiii!quote=MT Shooter]????
Are you referring to the Canon 10-22mm EF-S lens? If so, it is crop sensor only and will NOT mount on a full frame body either.[/quote]

Feb 7, 2014 13:13:37 #

That is true I did read that u ment full frame but the 14mm is ef

MT Shooter wrote:

????
Are you referring to the Canon 10-22mm EF-S lens? If so, it is crop sensor only and will NOT mount on a full frame body either.

Feb 7, 2014 13:07:23 #

Canon do s 10-22 n a mean 14mm

MT Shooter wrote:

I would really like to see a pic of that Nikon 10-20mm FX lens. Sigma makes a 10-20mm, and Nikon makes a 10-24mm, but neither of those lenses are FX versions and are both DX lenses (DC in Sigma terms).
Unless of course there is a lens out there I am unaware of, and that's entirely possible.

Feb 7, 2014 13:03:10 #

Canon or Nikon

Canons r better because the lenses have a red ring around the edge so they work faster lol.
Its just personal choice u cant go wrong with canon or nikon.

Feb 7, 2014 12:56:36 #

which raw editor is best

Yep in cambodia anka make sure u ask ur guide to take u to lady temple early morning!
Same vote when I traveled I just used the program that came with the camera.

Feb 7, 2014 12:49:55 #

Personally I use l series 17-40mm for my canon

Feb 7, 2014 12:41:26 #

Hypothetical Question:

Well said!

lowkick wrote:

My answer to you is, "the one in my hands&quo... (show quote)

Feb 7, 2014 11:03:55 #

Hypothetical Question:

Due to the value.i get enough funny looks in some countries carrying my camera around (set up 10gs) hasselblad would fresk me out due to value.yes I travel in some remote countries. I mean 5g bodg compared to a 40g body

Terra Australis wrote:

Why? It is a lot smaller than many other suggestions here and a lot faster to use.

Feb 5, 2014 19:45:33 #

He could have the aperture too slow for the shot he is taking which can focus lets say on a subjects forhead instead of eyes.

amehta wrote:

There is the potential for camera issues, either fine-tuning the AF or the focus issues the first D800s had. But until the OP has made sure he is using the best settings and technique, I wouldn't tackle the potential camera issues.

Feb 5, 2014 12:06:02 #

http://improvephotography.com/

Feb 5, 2014 11:50:01 #

Lol if u survived u would deserve yo keep it!
quote=Wall-E]If I got to keep it afterward, I'd probably take you up on that!

I just don't understand why people feel the need to do the 'texting' thing on a forum.[/quote]

:mrgreen:

Feb 5, 2014 11:44:39 #

Wtf! I stand corrected I would like to stick the sigma 500mm apo 2.8 wer da sun dnt shine n brake da body ova ya skull.
Ur not da only person dat can b rude!!

Wall-E wrote:

Please, I'm not flaming, but could you please not treat this like a text message/tweet?
Full words with reasonable grammar and punctuation?
It's not like you're limited to 140 characters.

:evil:

Feb 5, 2014 11:27:59 #

Yep but what has thid got to do with focus?

Gene51 wrote:

A raw file has no color, no sharpening, color space, contrast enhancement, saturation or white or color balance. What you see on the back of the camera or in Lightroom etc when you open it is the jpg preview that reflects those settings. With a raw file you are free to apply as much or as little adjustment to all of those parameters as you wish. This is true for all cameras as far as I know.