Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nascar27
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 111 next>>
Jan 11, 2023 13:57:54   #
I like the effect.
Go to
Jan 11, 2023 13:56:42   #
grandpaw wrote:
Interesting


LOL....I wouldn't mess with anyone that has a face like that!
Go to
Jan 11, 2023 09:00:35   #
[quote=nascar27][quote=f8lee]This is what is generally called a variable ND filter, and yes, it is a pair of CPLs that you can twist relative to each other to achieve nore or less darkening. I've had the Singh-Ray for years, and while it works well when it works, you need to be aware of a potential issue - what is called a "maltese cross" effect. This is where an X shaped shadow appears in the image.

I know from experience that this effect depends on the specific digital camera and lens being used (it never happens with film cameras). I believe it has to do with the constructive and destructive interference effect that can become visible on a particular sensor depending on the photosite sizes and spacing. In my case, the filter worked extremely well with a Nikon D600 but later I found the problem (which led me to learning about it) on my Fuji X-T1 and later, X-T2.

The point is - you need to use the filter on your particular camera to see if it will cause the issue.[/q[/quote]

Ok thanks for your input. Reviews mentioned that there was no "maltese cross" effect however it wasn't with my specific camera which is a Sony Alpha 7III. Will have to try it out to see for sure.
Go to
Jan 11, 2023 08:58:30   #
[quote=f8lee]This is what is generally called a variable ND filter, and yes, it is a pair of CPLs that you can twist relative to each other to achieve nore or less darkening. I've had the Singh-Ray for years, and while it works well when it works, you need to be aware of a potential issue - what is called a "maltese cross" effect. This is where an X shaped shadow appears in the image.

I know from experience that this effect depends on the specific digital camera and lens being used (it never happens with film cameras). I believe it has to do with the constructive and destructive interference effect that can become visible on a particular sensor depending on the photosite sizes and spacing. In my case, the filter worked extremely well with a Nikon D600 but later I found the problem (which led me to learning about it) on my Fuji X-T1 and later, X-T2.

The point is - you need to use the filter on your particular camera to see if it will cause the issue.[/q
Go to
Jan 10, 2023 18:56:32   #
Bill_de wrote:
Fstoppers has what seems to be a well balanced review.

https://fstoppers.com/reviews/reviews-haida-cpl-vnd-pro-ii-variable-nd-filter-polarization-613452

---


Thank you for that info.
Go to
Jan 10, 2023 18:00:54   #
User ID wrote:
Two CPLs wont work. The light exiting the front CPL is not polarized light.


From the video I watched it looks like the graduated ND is behind the CPl with each having its own adjustment ring.
I've used square ND's in the past but am not sure about this product. Thanks for your reply.
Go to
Jan 10, 2023 17:41:50   #
Longshadow wrote:
I'll guess it's just 2 CPLs, you rotate the primary for the CPL alignment and the other to get the VND.
Not sure if all VNDs are 2 polarizers or not...


Thanks...I'm not sure either thus the fact finding mission.
Go to
Jan 10, 2023 17:05:39   #
Has anyone heard of or used this filter combo? I've researched it and found pretty positive results. Normally costing $109.00 on Amazon. Polarpro has a filter like this and is about 2 1/2 times the cost.Even though the reviews say very good things about it, I'm a skeptical type of person looking for more opinions. I've never owned anything by this company and know very little about them except they are based in China. Thanks for any info/opinions.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 16:15:03   #
That is beautiful...needs a frame to mount somewhere.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 16:12:40   #
Excellent set...a marvel of human engineering!
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 16:10:01   #
Your photo makes me want to go there. Beautiful!
Go to
Jan 1, 2023 19:12:37   #
StanMac wrote:
Nice shot. Sometimes you have work with what you got, as they say. The background trees and roadis no more distracting than the foreground reeds. If one could have had a viewpoint of only the dock and the boats, that would have been an ideal situation. Crop the top and see if YOU like it better.

Stan


Thanks for your reply....funny thing the foreground reeds, boats, dock & water were the primary subjects and I didn't notice the road until it was on the home monitor. Happy New Year
Go to
Jan 1, 2023 19:10:42   #
jaymatt wrote:
No. It doesn’t distract at all. I’m not sure I would have noticed it if you hadn’t pointed it out.


Thanks for your reply and Happy New Year
Go to
Dec 31, 2022 13:45:36   #
anotherview wrote:
Good morning. You could crop out the forest area and still retain a strong photo of the colorful boats amid the docking area.
Happy New Year!


Thanks and Happy New Year to you!
Go to
Dec 31, 2022 13:45:09   #
luvmypets wrote:
It depends on what you want for your main subject. I scroll the photo to see what it would look like with the road there, gone and gone by how much. If your vision of this photo is the boats, then yes, crop out the road and you could even crop to the where the water meets the land. If it is the lake with the boats as part of the scene I would leave it as is. You could crop half way between the top of the photo and the wall and not lose the story. This would make the boats a little more prominent and the land less so.

Personally, I like it the way it is.

Dodie
It depends on what you want for your main subject.... (show quote)


The boats and immediate water area was the primary subject. I'm thinking that if I would do that shot again with the same background perhaps I change my apeture setting to increase the bokeh. Thanks for your reply.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 111 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.