I get a daily news feed on my Apple iPad. Mixed in the list of news articles are frequent ads. One came up a month or two ago advertising what appears to have been an ingeniously designed grocery cart. I was intrigued enough to "buy it now". Well, the product source is Australia. It was rather expensive, but the design appears to suit my aging 80+years. So, hit buy it now. Got a sold out notice with promise of availability coming soon. However, no pre-order function provided. Never could locate the add again nor the name of the cart. Tried Google search using "Australian grocery cart" and/or trolley . Got loads of hits but not the one I want.
This cart has 6 wheels- four on bottom and two on front of basket. Designed to roll basket off of cart into an SUV or station wagon. To close this post without taking more time, I will quit now. My question is....can anyone provide a name for this product? US price was about $399.00.

I seem to have missed the point here. Why is everybody suggesting you give the owner of the trespassing sign the benefit of the doubt ? If it is public land 10' either side of the roads (or 20" either side of the center line seen on here so I presume the 20" was a mistake) then why the hell are farmers or landowners putting up fences and signs within that area ? We are having a war in European over the same thing - somebody wanting to fence off a new boundary just because they think they have a right. Public right of way is just that.

So, I'm photographing covered bridges (91) in the state of Indiana. Many bridges in rural areas have property owner fencing adjacent to the roadway with no trespassing signage in clear view. There intent is obvious...stay the hell off my property. But here is the thing; there is a ten foot right of way on both sides of the road, and they are eliminating access with their fencing. The dilemma: obey the signage, or assert your right to public access. To get to the waterway to photograph the bridge, I need access. I assert my rights. Additionally, some prohibit access to the waterway the same way...but here is the thing, they do not own to the shore line, only to the high water mark, which is defined by flooding. Knowing the law, I assess the situation and determine how bad I want that waterway view of the covered bridge, and act accordingly. I know the law, and I know my rights...but, I don't know the hostility that could come down on my head. I take a pocket full of money, and if necessary, I'll buy my way out of hostility, and I walk away with the shot! Got to have guts, determination, and a clear view of what you are doing. Navigable streams are owned by the state. Having fun but being cautious also. Get the shot!