Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ssymeono
Page: <<prev 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 40 next>>
Aug 3, 2015 10:56:55   #
Wonderful pictures but so different from each other! Are these colors accidental or you have control over them?
Go to
Jul 31, 2015 10:21:04   #
Great shot!

I don't recall seeing this before, is it the Hairy (or Winter) Vetch? Do you have an image with leaves?

Sarantis
Go to
Jul 28, 2015 12:02:23   #
Wonderful pictures and reporting!
Go to
Jul 26, 2015 10:50:43   #
Great shots! I suspect everyone will be asking how you did it.
Go to
Jul 23, 2015 12:33:53   #
Math78 wrote:
I'd be a little skeptical of the ratings on this site. You'll also find that 42nd St Photo is at 8.05 and 47th St Photo at 9.99 (!).


I agree, this is a poorly produced site, suspiciously biased toward stores known to be bad (hard to believe 42nd St. higher than B@H!). Was this site prepared by Martians or Mafians?
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 12:15:01   #
jerrypoller wrote:
I did send an email yesterday to Nikon, but used the S/N from the Exif file. As suggested by another Hog, I finally found it barely visible on the aperture ring: 208060. I'll update my email to Nikon with the correct number and see what they say. Thanks for all the advice.


Good for you! You found it and it's a nice one, easy to remember.
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 10:58:52   #
Fkaufman3 wrote:
Send Nikon the serial number and description and see what they say. I would be interested in results


The serial number on this lens is barely visible. It has been pressed on the last black ring of the lens where it attaches to the camera. It has six digits. The OP has not provided us with it or even with a photo of the lens.
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 10:53:38   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Word of mouth amounts to verification ? I found this while researching... Nikon likely bought out plants in Thailand & China....
http://www.dslrbodies.com/nikon/about-nikon/nikon-faq/where-are-nikon-cameras-and.html

We have been discussing prime Nikkor lenses. I would keep my ears wide open for any real proof that any of them were not made by Nikon or in Japan.
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 09:51:51   #
camerapapi wrote:
You are right, the lens was manufactured by Nikon.
As far as I know Nikon does not rely on any other company to make its lenses. Tokina was founded by some optical engineers that used to work for Nikon but their resemblance stops right there.
Until today Nikon continues to manufacture its own lenses with their own raw materials.


Thank you for verifying. Please note that JPL on page 2 of this thread has actually solved the mystery as a computer mistake or camera glitch.
Go to
Jul 12, 2015 14:01:02   #
Kuzano wrote:
I encourage the OP to find a picture of the lens in question that is branded Tokina (they made the same lens) and compare the image to his Nikon Nikkor. That will help sort this out a bit.


MT Shooter has posted an image of the Tokina lens. I appreciate your effort to write an essay on manufacturers making lenses for each other. I am well aware of this practice. I was only trying to express doubt that Nikon (one of the premier lens manufacturers) would release a prime, new lens made by someone else.
Go to
Jul 12, 2015 12:03:31   #
Kuzano wrote:
Lens branding has been common for years. Sigma, Tokina, and many others have built lenses to mfr specs, (nikon, Canon, Olympus and others)and branded them to the MFR name. Still being done today. Since the lenses are to MFR spec they should be as good as the MFR would build.

However, that's not always a guarantee of excellent IQ. Nikon and others have surely even made and sold some of their own POS lenses.

You may have a Tokina built Nikkor. Entirely possible.

The tell tale is usually the serial number. If checked against Nikon listings it may give you an answer.
Lens branding has been common for years. Sigma, To... (show quote)


I have owned this lens for many years (picture attached). It was introduced in 1993 and was the predecessor of AF 17-35 and like it it maintains f/2.8 aperture throughout. It has a filter thread of 77mm, 14 elements in 11 groups. It was Nikon's first AF lens for extreme wide-angle range. The serial number of mine is 242267. There is no indication on it that it was made by Tokina or any other company.


Go to
Jul 12, 2015 11:23:45   #
Mac wrote:
http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/11-most-expensive-digital-cameras-360077/


I wonder if anyone in UHH owns one of these and could share a few shots with us!
Go to
Jul 12, 2015 09:37:02   #
jerrypoller wrote:
Since I started reading this forum about 6 months ago, I upgraded my kit to a refurbished Nikon D610 from Cameta, and found two used Nikon/Nikkor lenses on Ebay - a Nikkor 35-70 f/2.8, and a Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8. To complete my lens set, I just scored an Ebay lens that was listed as Nikon Zoom-Nikkor AF D 20-35 mm F/2.8 AF-D AF. All the markings on the lens confirm this - and it is marked Made in Japan. Yesterday I used it for the first time and when I opened the "info" window on my iMac, the lens comes up as a "Tokina AT-X 235 AF PRO (AF 20-35mm f/2.8)". What's the story here. The lens is clearly marked Nikon/ AF Nikkor. My other Nikkor lenses come up in the Apple Photos info window as Nikon manufactured lenses. Before I contact the seller, is there an explanation for the discrepancy? Thanks.
Since I started reading this forum about 6 months ... (show quote)


It would help to see an image or two of your lens.
Go to
Jul 11, 2015 10:37:25   #
Nikon and Canon also sell their products through the internet, even have discounts. Check them out!
Go to
Jul 10, 2015 17:44:06   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Here are a couple of images from the Sigma DPs I had...


Scott, I love your photos and your flickr site. You are a Nikon Man, so am I. I was simply curious about the SD 1 Merrill but so far no owner of it has replied. Is it a ghost camera?
Sarantis
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 40 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.