Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: genocolo
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 92 next>>
Nov 8, 2023 12:16:48   #
Terrific.
Go to
Nov 8, 2023 12:15:21   #
Architect1776 wrote:
That's about 1.5 hours at 15 seconds each which is really fast.
Most people would go nuts looking at someone else's vacation photos that long.
Perhaps 20-30 at most that have discussion value.
If they are of places seen by everyone dozens of times everywhere what value?
If as background just to have running for no reason to run most TV can do that.
Most people would go


Isn’t 15 seconds per slide an awfully long time? Usually 3-5 seconds works well.
Go to
Nov 5, 2023 19:37:23   #
Spectacular wall-hangers!
Go to
Nov 1, 2023 12:45:02   #
coolhanduke wrote:
I use Sandisk SSD drives. At least a 2 TB. My MacBook Pro has 1 TB SSD drive in it.
If you are a Costco member they have good prices on the drives.
Otherwise, I buy from Amazon. A bigger selection but stay with SSD. Although more expensive, they are faster and more reliable. I think every hard drive I have no SSD has had issues after a while.


Thanks for the good advice.
Go to
Nov 1, 2023 12:36:54   #
This conversation continues to expand way beyond anything I envisioned or can understand.

My original question, many pages ago, was essentially, “should a photographer, who posts or publishes a terrific photo of a very blue tri-color heron in flight, note that it was pp to make it more blue?”

When I first saw it, it did not cross my mind that it was pp. I thought what an excellent and unique capture it was.


Maybe I should just assume that all posted photos have been pp by the photographer. (I am not taking about what camera pre and post processing.)
Go to
Nov 1, 2023 12:23:05   #
burkphoto wrote:
Apple discontinued both the 21.5" and 27" Intel iMacs about three years ago. They updated the 24" iMac from the M1 to M3 system-on-a-chip this past Monday. At the same time, they updated all the 14" and 16" MacBook Pros to M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max versions. They also killed the 13" MacBook Pro.

UNEQUIVOCALLY, YES, the M-series chips are a radical improvement over the Intel-based Macs! They use about a third of the electricity, and perform faster. The M3 should astound you. Even the base original M1 iMac is faster than the fastest Intel iMac ever made.

There have been rumors of a 27" or 30" or 32" iMac for the last five years, but nothing has materialized. Personally, I doubt they'll make a larger model, since they make the Apple Studio and the Apple Studio Display, now, instead of the iMac Pro. They are also selling more MacBook Airs and MacBook Pros than iMacs.

The 24" iMac can support one external monitor up to 6K resolution. If you need more screen real estate, and/or a bigger monitor, get an external monitor as big as you want. In 2021, I replaced by old iMac with a 2020 13" M1 MacBook Air and an LG 27UP850-W 27” UHD (3840 x 2160) IPS Monitor. I couldn't be happier, as it gives me portability and far more power than I had in the old iMac. I use my old iMac keyboard and mouse with the laptop in my home office.

It makes more sense in 2023 to get a machine with NOMINAL internal SSD storage. MOST users should be fine with 16 GB of Unified Memory (RAM shared by all processors) and 1 TB of internal storage, plus external drives. The least internal storage I would ever get on an M1, M2, or M3 Mac is 512 GB. The least internal storage I would get on the M2/M3 Pro or M2/M3 Max Macs is 1TB. That's because the base M2 and base M3 models use only one 256 GB module, while 512 GB and larger M2 and M3 models get TWO modules, which are configured in a RAID array that runs twice as fast. That means all Input/Output operations run twice as fast.

I understand the "convenience feature" of large internal storage drives, but I also understand the risk of putting all my data on one drive. I have several backup drives and long term storage drives. I use SSD drives for speed, and spinning platter hard drives for long term storage and backup.

Any file I'm "done with" goes onto an external drive AND a backup drive, and a copy of it is stored online. I've seen enough hard drives fail over the last 38 years to know I can't afford a failure! My wife lost two drives in the late 2000s. Fortunately, none of it was priceless photos or important work product, and most of it WAS backed up.

If your current iMac's internal hard drive is a spinning platter, or a "Fusion" drive (a hybrid combination of a small SSD and a much larger spinning hard drive), you will be SHOCKED at the speed difference of the M3 iMac, which can be up to four times faster than the fastest Intel iMacs.

Apple Silicon M-series Macs use completely different processing schemes from the old Intel Macs. The last four versions of MacOS have been re-written as "Universal Binary" systems that run on BOTH Intel AND Apple Silicon computers. MOST third party software has been updated or upgraded to run on Apple Silicon, so most third party software is now Universal, too.

A few older applications will run with Apple's "X86 emulator" known as Rosetta 2. Rosetta 2 is installed the first time you run an Intel-only application, and after that, the application runs seamlessly.

Even fewer old Intel applications won't run at all on Apple Silicon Macs, so if you have one, you'll need to find a substitute, or upgrade the old app if a new version is available.

If you use Intel-based plug-ins in your imaging applications, you will need to open your imaging application in Rosetta 2 mode (Accessed via the Get Info dialog for any universal app), THEN install the plug-in. After that, you usually can switch back to native mode by unchecking the "Open using Rosetta" box in the Get Info dialog. I have had to do this for one plug-in, Negative Lab Pro for Adobe Lightroom Classic. It works perfectly. You only do it once.

MOST important to realize: When you buy an M-series Mac, *it is what it is, until it dies. There are NO possible user upgrades.* So get the amount of Unified Memory and internal SSD storage you will need for the anticipated life of the machine (which should be 5-7 years, generally, because Apple won't have parts, won't provide service, and won't offer OS upgrades after that). It's expensive up front, but hassle free down the road, so long as you choose wisely.

I know that sounds like "the forced Apple Tax," or something sinister, but it really is just Apple's engineers thinking differently about speed, processing power, and reliability (fewer socketed components = fewer connections to fail from oxidation and vibration).

Without getting TOO technical, just know that MOST of the computer is integrated onto ONE small die containing all the CPU cores, GPU cores, Neural Engine cores, RAM chips used as Unified Memory for all those cores, and many other sub-system processors for video, audio, etc. (See the M1 die below.) Apple densely packs BILLIONS of transistors onto that single chip, reducing the space between them. Even at the speed of light, it takes one nanosecond for a signal to go 11 inches down a wire. When moving zillions of bits of data, the shorter the wire, the faster the data gets moved! The ARM architecture behind Apple's chip designs is a radical departure from the x86 architecture Intel has used for decades.

The Apple Silicon M3 chip uses Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's 3-nanometer layering process, which creates the fastest semiconductor circuitry available today. It also uses the least power, so Mac laptops have phenomenal battery life, and they don't slow down on battery power, as do most Intel/AMD laptops. They also generate little heat, which is why the MacBook Air has no fans.
Apple discontinued both the 21.5" and 27"... (show quote)


Thank you for your as always excellent and understandable analysis and recommendations. What external drives would you recommend for a new m3 MacBook Pro with 1tb internal and 16 gb of ram?
Go to
Oct 31, 2023 18:54:08   #
Well, I did not mean to unleash a can of worms by my inartfully worded and perhaps confusing question. Let me try again.


First let me make it clear that I am not talking about cropping or straightening, but some pp which actually alters the substance or focus of the photo.

In thinking more about my concern of the enhanced color of a specific bird, I came up with another example: suppose a photographer takes a photo of a gathering of ten men. In pp, the photographer cuts and replaces one man with a woman (maybe to give the impression of a more integrated group), and then publishes the photo. Let's assume that the identities of the subjects or the gender makeup of the group in the original photo were important to the viewer. But the viewer would not know that one man had been replaced by a woman unless the photographer revealed that the photo had been pp.


So, what then is the difference between that extreme example and the one with the enhanced color of the bird. In either case, the viewer would not know that the photo was not an accurate capture of the reality of what the photographer saw and therefore did not capture reality. Maybe there is no bird that is that blue. The photographer did not reveal that the phots had been pp.

This prompted me to do a little research on the internet and I found a number of interesting articles, such as "Do news photographs reflect reality or do they construct it?" If you are curious, google something like, "Is a photo supposed to capture reality?"

Of course, this all relates to AI and "deepfakes" too. Interesting times.
Go to
Oct 31, 2023 13:49:24   #
Terrific, all.
Go to
Oct 31, 2023 13:21:27   #
I’m not sure how to express my question or raise the issue. Maybe it begs the question of whether a photo of a living thing (like a bird, animal, or human) is subjective “art” or is a capture of objective reality?

A few days ago, I commented glowingly on a particular photo of a bird because I was struck by the intense and unique color of the bird which I had never seen before. I thought to myself how lucky and talented the photographer was to capture this unique bird. Then, in some later comments, the photographer referred to some pp.

Maybe this shows my naïveté. But I was surprised. Maybe we should assume that all published photos are pp.

Obviously I guess a photo can be both art and reality. But in this instance, I would have appreciated knowing that it really wasn’t “real” but an artistic version of realty.

What do you think?
Go to
Oct 31, 2023 13:04:19   #
imagemeister wrote:
Thanks ! , I did bump the saturation a small bit, but my main concern was making the water look presentable .....along with the feathers.


I am obviously an admirer of your work (see my prior comment). But I must say that I think when a photo depends so much on color, you should reveal that it has been pp when you post it.
Go to
Oct 29, 2023 15:00:45   #
Two of the most unbelievable bird photos I’ve ever seen.
Go to
Oct 28, 2023 13:10:32   #
Don’t bet on it
Go to
Oct 28, 2023 12:25:39   #
Jeannie88 wrote:
Yesterday, saw someone with a Nikon Bridge camera. As I am getting older, that seems like a good way to go, especially if I travel. Any one using a Nikon Bridge camera, or an olympus(if there is one)? I have used DSLRS for years and wonder if I would really like a one does it all camera?Right Now I am an Olympus User, although I was a nikon User for many years. What about Sony? Many years ago , I did have a Sony 828, I think it was called, and the color , and macros were wonderful


My “bridge camera” is an IPhone ProMax. Other than for wildlife maybe, what else do I need?
Go to
Oct 25, 2023 19:08:27   #
Fredrick wrote:
OK, against my better judgement, I have agreed to shoot a wedding for my cousin’s son’s wedding. Please don’t tell me it’s a really bad idea and that I should offer to pay for a professional photographer. I know you all mean well. I’ve already done that. As a bit of background:
I recently took a series of photos at another wedding (as a guest … they also had a professional photographer) and sent them out to a number of relatives. This groom to be (this August), his fiancée, and his parents looked at the photos and called me and begged me to shoot their wedding. I said no, no, no and downplayed any expectations, but to no avail. They loved the photos that I did as a guest at another wedding, so I just don’t see a way out of this without jeopardizing our relationship. No, I’ve not shot a wedding before. I’m mostly a landscape and street photographer.
So, I’m going to go ahead with this, and here is where I would appreciate any help and insight you could provide:
I currently own a Fuji X100V (fixed 35mm FF equiv, 26mp camera) and a Fuji X-T2 (24mm MILC camera) with plenty of zoom and prime lenses. The X100V has a leaf shutter, enabling me to fill flash up to 1/4,000 of a second. I have just a little experience using flash outdoors or indoors.
The wedding will be at my cousin's house (with a huge backyard). The ceremony will take place in the afternoon in the backyard, and reception will be in the backyard and also inside the house. Probably around 40-50 people. Lots of young adults and laid back relatives.
What I’m trying to figure out is, which camera do I use? Do I use both? What focal lengths? All the photos that I took at the other wedding as a guest was with my X100V, using fill flash with the built-in camera flash. Do I use one camera for outside and one camera for inside the house? The X100V has a built in digital teleconverter for 50mm and 70mm (in addition to the 35mm) which I can easily change. Which flash unit (if any) should I buy? I’m looking at Nissin and Godox TTL flashes (and my head is spinning). I realize if I use a flash I will have to practice quite a bit for it to become second nature to me (I have 4 months before the wedding). I plan on shooting in RAW + Jpeg, and use PSE and Luminar for post processing.
As you can see, I have some decisions to make before I start practicing. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!
OK, against my better judgement, I have agreed to ... (show quote)


Make sure at least two people shoot video even if it only with iPhone. Entrance, ceremony and after wedding. One shooter should be in first row to get sound or use external mic so that u record and can hear the ceremony. Do some research on videoing a wedding.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 13:16:44   #
Aren’t we fortunate to have such beautiful places?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 92 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.