"Are the American people this shallow and willing to to take it up the ass?"

Fair question. If we were a democracy, in which every v**e that was cast was counted fairly and equally, and the popular majority chose our leaders, and the majority had chosen this Orange Pumpkinead jackass as our leader, then your question would be an "affirmative". As it stands, this Orange JackAss Nincompoop was not chosen by the majority of the American people, as his opponent received 3 million more v**es. But the American N**i Republican Party has managed to rig the e******n system in which they generally choose the President without having to win the popular v**e for president. The legislature is similarly r****d and gerrymandered, giving the Orange Nincompoop's party a permanent majority in the Senate, no matter that their party gets less v**es, and an overrepresented proportion in the lower house.

Furthermore, the Orange JackAss'es approval ratings have been consistently below half of the population during the almost 2 years in office, hovering around just over 1/3 of the population on average.

So, to answer you question, no, the American people as a whole are not this shallow and willing to to take it up the ass, but somehow the minority of assholes running the place have managed to maintain their grip on power and shove it up the asses of the majority whether they want it or not.

"Balance" is one of those words in that category of words that cause great consternation among right wingers, who prefer to see things in black and white. It's from a category of words having to do with grey areas, objectivity, moderation, complexity, etc. Attempting to use such words while discussing right winger's dogmatic beliefs (which can encompass all subject matter from reality to fantasy, or in other words, everything) can get dicey and unpredictable.

Besides causing confusion, those kinds of words somehow stimulate the Amygdala section of the brain, which generate fear and base instinct/survival types of emotions. Apparently, the prospect of dogmatic wingers recognizing shades of grey, objectivity, complexity, etc., are a source of fear that their survival/identity is being threatening.

This is the pattern, anyway, that I have observed while interacting with wingers.

It's useful for normal folk, who tend to be very comfortable with shades-of-grey type words in their normal every day discourse, to try to remember that when conversing with wingers, tossing around those shades-of-grey types of words is like tossing a grenade. It can startle and scare away wingers when you weren't trying to.

Sometimes giving a warning first before tossing it can help. "Ok, now Im' going to use a word that might cause some fear and trepidation so I thought I would give you a chance to prepare for it...ok...ready?...Here it comes........I'm a conservative who disagrees with Trump.........Hey, where are you going?"

T***SLATION: I don't recognize standard English definitions for any words that don't serve my alt right w***e s*********t narrative. As a winger consumed with fear over my own closeted homosexual tendencies, I much prefer the alternate definitions found in the Dictionary of Republican Speak.


Gotcha. Thanks.

Oh, speaking of such, check it out. The latest edition of "Speaking Republican" handy desk reference is out now.

Sure, no problem. You can find them on the right wing's favorite and most cited science journal - youtube!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Wow. You have that entire NRA script memorized. Good job!

"He should be running a mental asylum, not a wonderful country."

If he was allowed to run a mental asylum, he would sell out all the other patients to the highest bidder, after first s**mming and fleecing the patients and their families out of all their money. Either that, or he would get them all k**led with his mind boggling incompetence and dangerously poor judgement.


The only safe and proper place for an incurable malignant narcissistic psychopath with rapidly advancing Alzheimer's, is away from other people. Someone like that is not even fit to be chief dog catcher. He needs to be put out on a farm way way out in the boonies, far far away from civilization. And no twitter or facebook! OH, and this is important - a farm with no farm animals for him to abuse and torture. He needs to be "put out to pasture", as the saying goes.

After this dangerous, bumbling, treasonous, train wreck of a wannabe Banana Republic Kleptocracy is removed from the White House, and if the country, even the world, is still in one piece at that point, we need to implement new screening procedures for the 'highest office in the land'. It is incredible to me that no background checks are required for that seat. That has to change!

But Rose, if what you say is true, it would be so easy for you to prove that I am a liar and you are not by quoting the words from that document you linked to that you keep insisting was proof of your claim that Tahoe homeowners were stopped from raking their pine needles and leaves, like I have asked you to do several times now. It would be a huge validation and vindication for you to prove me a liar here. That's why I'm baffled that you aren't jumping at the opportunity to prove me a liar, and that the link you posted proves your claim that Tahoe homeowners were stopped from raking their pine needles. But you won't.

We all know why you won't do it, Rose. Because you are a pathetic liar.

You can actually stomach him for a few minutes at a time?

Wow. So you are putting words in my mouth, and then even after I corrected you, you went right back to putting your own words in my mouth insisting that you know what I meant more than I do?

You are completely nuts.

Thanks.

As I suspected, the claim that Canada had more firearms per capita than the US was way off!

There are an estimated 270 million firearms in the U.S., according to the independent research project called ‘Small Arms Survey.’ That’s 89 firearms per 100 residents, making the U.S. the No. 1 country for gun ownership.

Canada, on the other hand, ranks 13th on the study’s list, with 9.95 million firearms — or 31 per 100 residents.

Moore's claim was 100% false. Surprising, because Michael Moore is usually more careful with his claims.

Nice deflection, running defense for another of this site's most prolific liars. Yea, you lying trolls need to work together in a tag team, to bolster your strength.

"Last I knew, Canadians had more guns per capita than the US."

I seriously doubt that is true.

Post the proof that Tahoe homeowners were stopped from raking their pine needles, or admit you lied.

Spoken like a true NRA Wingnut™.