Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dleebrick
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Nov 19, 2020 10:48:43   #
Verryl wrote:
That is a big problem in astrophotography, although lenses are not common on Refractor scopes (see
https://optcorp.com/blogs/astronomy/the-basic-telescope-types?gclid=CjwKCAiAzNj9BRBDEiwAPsL0d1NRrom9r7RZmWkEcA_m2qqNlCjFNquNrhIR8CsyGJ2K1-Yd5EZMVBoCvtUQAvD_BwE ) for scopes types. Even my 16" mirror diameter (2.5" thick glass) would fog up way Down inside the 88 inch long 21" diameter tube.

The temp equilibrium is not the prime factor; the humidity is. Eventually with enough humidity on a damp night both will fog up, but the light weight (low thermal mass) filter will go first.

We always have scopes set up and all hardware outside by dusk, but later in the evening sometimes the dew starts to get worse. At a star party with many observers/scopes it is common to hear a hair blow dryer start up and run for a few seconds to a minute. Your situation may just have been a combination of time of night (dew usually starts later as it gets cooler), and the very low thermal mass of the filter (it cools rapidly) compared to the heavy camera/scope. On some nights the hairdryers are used a lot, on other nights hardly ever.
Verryl
That is a big problem in astrophotography, althoug... (show quote)


That's the best explanation I've seen so far.
Go to
Nov 18, 2020 23:08:46   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
Did the filter come from a pocket like your pants or shirt?


Both camera and filter were left outside for 30 minutes to equilibrate with the outside conditions.
Go to
Nov 18, 2020 21:29:23   #
Tonight is clear and I am doing some night sky photography. Its 37 degrees, so have taken the camera and filter outside for 20 minutes to allow temperature equilibration to avoid fogging. Set up the camera, took a half hour sequence of shots, no problem with fogging. Added a screw-on light pollution filter and within 10 minutes, the filter, not the camera lens, is badly fogged up on the surface facing the lens. What do you think the solution might be? The filter is the Hoya Starscape filter. It does a great job of reducing light pollution.
Go to
Sep 11, 2020 10:33:27   #
mwsilvers wrote:
If you are just basing your shutter count on the SD card image number than you can not rely on it being accurate count. Understand that the number of the count on your SD card is not the same as the number of actuations of your shutter. They are two different things.


Exactly!
Go to
Jul 18, 2020 20:22:25   #
CindyHouk wrote:
Thanks for the info! I will check out that type of remote...it sounds a lot easier than the Pixel one I have. But I was able to get it to work and figured out what I was doing wrong....so at least I can play again and try and get a good star trail shot! I was able to get a cool shot of the Comet the other night as well....that was really something to see.


Can you post your comet image?
Go to
Jul 17, 2020 16:14:46   #
Go to
Jul 17, 2020 12:03:51   #
CindyHouk wrote:


Once the delay gets to 0 the camera clicks and is engaged to take the shot - now when the Pixel gets to 0 for the first shot and switches to Intvl and starts counting down 2 -1 and that's when I hear the next click.


The key observation here is that the second click does not occur until the Intvl counter has counted down. That means that the exposure did not end until then. So, I did this experiment with my Canon 80D and my Aputure TR1C Intervalometer. Using your setup with camera in manual mode, my equipment behaved exactly like yours did, ie. only every other cycle of the intervalometer produced an exposure. Switching to Bulb mode achieved the expected number of shots. What is going on is that in Manual camera mode, the exposure time is not being controlled by the intervalometer, but is being controlled by the camera. The camera is not looking for a possible signal from the intervalometer until it is all done with its manual sequence. The camera is ready for an intervalometer signal by the time your "interval" timer has expired; that's why you here a click then.
To prove that to myself, I set the "length" parameter on my intervalometer to 40 seconds, leaving the "interval" set to 2 seconds. Sure enough, the camera terminated the exposure on its own, after its timer hit 30 seconds. As soon as data writing to the SD card was complete, it was ready for the next intervalometer command. The intervalometer continued to count down to 0 seconds, then did the "interval" timing and when the next 40 second cycle started, the camera launched its next 30 second exposure.
So, to avoid the camera and the intervalometer "fighting" with each other for control of the exposure, you need to be in "bulb" mode, which you have already concluded. This experiment does clear up some confusion on my part; I'll be sure to use "bulb" mode the next time I'm doing time lapse work.
Go to
May 16, 2020 16:30:53   #
This may be part of the answer. Let's say that the 100% crop displays a part of the original image that has as many pixels as your monitor does, in other words, 1164 by 776. Now, what portion of the original image, when cropped by 75%, would just fit in your monitor? The answer if 1552 x 1034, very close to your 75% crop values. What part of the original image, after cropping 50%, would just fit in your monitor? Answer is 2328 x 1552.
Unfortunately, this rationale doesn't work for the crops larger than 100%, so I can't explain that. But maybe this is part of the answer, anyway.
Go to
May 10, 2020 21:32:46   #
Got my SharpStar 2 filter this week, tonight it is clear enough to try it out. Works just as advertised. Easy to determine best focus. Top image is at 18mm, F3.5 while lower image isw at 135mm, F5.6. Canon 80D body.




Go to
Mar 1, 2020 14:25:10   #
DA_Photo wrote:
I’m planning on a doors off helicopter tour next week on Kauai. I understand that changing lenses is a bad idea and probably not even allowed in flight. I have a Fuji XT3 (crop sensor) and my lenses are 10-24 & 50-140. Any thoughts on which of these would be the better choice?


I looked back at some of our shots from the Kauai helicopter tour and found that nearly all the shots were taken at the wide end of my zoom lens; most were around 18 mm.
You'll love the flight!


(Download)
Go to
Feb 9, 2020 13:11:01   #
Linda S. wrote:
Hello! I read that it is better to download your photos to a card reader and then go from the card reader to the computer. It was said to be better than downloading photos directly from the camera using a USB cable. I have to admit all I've ever done is use the USB cable.

Just in case I should use a card reader, is there one brand that you recommend? I have several that were given out as premiums for marketing events. I don't know if I should trust those or not.

Any insights you could share would be most appreciated. Thank you so much in advance.
Hello! I read that it is better to download your p... (show quote)


Use of a card reader is not a two step process. In other words, you don't download your photos to the card reader and then transfer from the card reader to the computer. Instead, you insert your SD card into the card reader; then your computer uses the card reader to transfer images from your SD card to your computer. The card reader will have a slot to insert your SD card into, and a USB plug to insert into your computer. Its very simple, cost effective and reliable.
Go to
Jan 24, 2020 09:42:31   #
Don't subscribe, use Corel PSP
Go to
Jan 21, 2020 09:36:29   #
We did the Egypt/Jordan/Israel trip in June and enjoyed every minute of it. Took Canon 80D and the Canon 18-135 lens. Occasionally wanted more reach, but not worth the hassle of another lens. We were part of a land tour with Israel Tour Consultants. Never felt threatened anywhere, even in downtown Cairo. Two weeks was long enough only for an introduction. Cairo, pyramids, old churches, traditional Mt. Sinai, Petra, Mt. Nebo, Tel Aviv, 2 days in the Galilee area, 3 days around Jerusalem. Backed up images from SD card every night on WD My Passport Wireless Pro. Shot everything in RAW. Trip of a lifetime.
Go to
Dec 10, 2019 09:16:14   #
via the lens wrote:
PhotoPills


Go to
Oct 6, 2019 18:57:28   #
jackm1943 wrote:
I don't know about the ideal lens, but while you are in the area you might want to also check out the Quivira National Wildlife Refuge, not far away at all, a few miles west of Sterling.


Thanks jackm1943. I plan to catch both of them, since we'll be at Sterling for 50th college reunion.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.