Trump seems to think that any treaty he signs is just something that can be torn up as a tool when negotiating with someone else. He's just shafted S Korea, why would KJU think he wouldn't do the same to him?

Unfortunately, we are. It's just taking a little longer than expected.

No "no-go zones" here. Even if there were, it would have nothing to do with NK.

When you've nearly finished picking sides in gym class.

I try that but I keep getting sucked in.

I've answered this on a different thread. It's all about the advertisers.

Unfortunately, the attic is the most used section. It keeps the advertisers happy.

Why can't the makers of sliced loaves get together with the makers of electric toasters, and decide what size a slice of bread should be?

That's one hell of a guess considering you have nothing to base it on.

I suppose that theoretically there's no reason why a camera can't be made that allows you to set a shutter speed at a millionth of a stop. I'm not familiar with the Nikon D850, but I assume that you select the shutter speed by scrolling through those available using a dial. It would take a long time to scroll through a million speeds just to alter by one stop. The fact is that there has to be an increment by which the shutter speed can be moved, and so even if it was set at a millionth of a stop, then there would still be a setting between that you wouldn't be able to set. 1/3 of a stop has been decided upon because it's good enough. May I just ask if there's a reason why you would want to set such a precise speed?

I was defending a decision to lock a guy up, in order to prevent him from broadcasting information, that could have resulted in a miss trial, thus allowing a Muslim rape gang to walk free. How do you get that I'm totally fine with the Muslim rape gangs roaming the streets and raping girls, from that?

Just bear in mind that it may become difficult to handhold at longer zooms. In these cases, you would be better off cropping a sharper image than having a viewfinder full of camera shake.

The reason he was descended upon with such force and not just told to move along, is that he had been ordered to stop several times before. He was running the risk of the trial being declared a miss-trial because of his actions. He was broadcasting live so the damage was being done as he was doing it, so he had to be stopped immediately. There would have been no point in giving him a trial date in a couple of months time. It may seem that we have a mishmash of laws and rules, that's because we've been around long enough, well over 250 years if you can imagine such a thing, to realise that one size rarely fits all, sometimes you need to look at individual cases. No-one is turning a blind eye here. This guy is being kept out of the way so that he can't destroy the case against these people.
Given the events in Hollywood that have recently come to light, are you sure you want to talk about Jimmy Savile?

Snopes may appear to be left-wing, but that's only because they disprove a lot of right-wing bulls**t. And, at the moment, there is a lot of right-wing bulls**t out there. Although I'm not sure how much of this right-wing bulls**t is started by left-wingers in an attempt to make the right look bad.

As for freedom of speech: We're allowed to say "cunt" on television. And, nobody gets pissed off when someone insults one of our politicians.

I read the book before I saw the film. I'm not sure I would have understood the film otherwise.

I think I may have given the wrong impression here. I'm not trying to be rude or sarcastic. There seems to be a couple of ways that people say it. Sometimes they say "nice camera" as you may say "nice car" if someone pulls up alongside you in a carpark. Other times they say "that's a nice camera" as if they're telling you something you didn't already know. It's the latter that gets me confused.
It's probably just an inflexion in their voice that I obviously can't describe here.