Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: shutterbug64
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Nov 14, 2012 08:27:37   #
kurme wrote:
Festina Lente wrote:
kurme wrote:
Hi just a question i bought still shot 150 lighting off of ebay. I find they are not great it has one halogen bulb. When i use continuous lighting they are not bright enough and when i use the stobes at the lowest setting they are way to bright. Should i buy better lighting and if so what do you recommend? i don't need to make this mistake again. My friend and i bought the same set and have the same problems so she bought a way better set and all the problems went away. The only thing is i can't afford to pay 2000$ right now because i bought the 24-70 6months ago.So any suggestions of lighting that is good but won't break the bank to much;b?
Hi just a question i bought still shot 150 lightin... (show quote)

I'd like to help, but I'm not sure what you purchased and what you are using it for. Sounds like you are doing studio photography based on the halogen bulb (?).

Please provide more specifics about what you have and are doing and you will get much better suggestions from a wealth of experience here on UHH.

Standing by....
quote=kurme Hi just a question i bought still sho... (show quote)
quote=Festina Lente quote=kurme Hi just a questi... (show quote)


Are these continious lights or strobe(flash) lights? What is the brand and model#?
My bad. mafadecay answered your question.
Go to
Nov 13, 2012 07:38:45   #
The Million dollar question. In photography it is hard to put a price on investment of your time, equipment and cost of operation (lights, water, heat, office, mileage, etc.). If it were a retail store it is much simpler to figure since you can put a finger on the raw cost of operation. What will the market in your area handle. The main thing is, don't discount your work. If your selling it, you are now a professional. If you are giving it away, you are still competing with professionals. General rule of thumb for easy figuring: Take your raw cost (the money you have to pay to get the end result) and if you multiply it by 3, you might break even with overhead but probably not, if you multiply it by 6, you might make a profit, if you multiply it by 10 you are probably making a profit and so on. But it is all relative to how your perceive yourself as a professional. You are selling yourself as part of the end result. If you don't believe in your product (and yourself) then it's not worth 2 cents. How long will your product last? Is it printed on your home inkjet or professionally printed? With this digital era, your main cost is your equipment and mostly your time. What is your time worth? Don't cut yourself short.
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 20:00:09   #
Jim Peters wrote:
mikeysaling wrote:
Seems to me that wedding photographers would have a hard time in the real world - press photography . How can the moment of a lifetime be POSED ! let the uncle bills take ALL the photos and then let the B & G choose what that want to keep . Its all a scam if you ask me - who needs the 'pro' or 'overpriced' snappers. let friends and relatives do it all had hoc


I Was A Press Photographer During The Viet Nam War.Weddings Are Actually Harder Than Dodging Enemy Fire!
Over 40 Years In The business If Everyone Thought like You,Well--- My Tax Returns Don't Lie! We have Never Had a Problem With The Uncle Bills. In Fact some Of Them are The People Who Reffered us.We Have Cross Marketed Wedding To Other Types Of Business Family Groups.When I Was A News Photographer I Made A nickle Dime Income And worked Bad Hours. As Full Time Business I Do Much Better. Because BEING IN BUSINESS IS THE REAL WORLD!!
quote=mikeysaling Seems to me that wedding photog... (show quote)


Vietnam Photographer----I was a Navy Photographer in the Phillipines with short TAD's in Vietnam & Bangkok and then continued it as a business for the past 45 years. I have enjoyed dodging bullets at weddings for all of those 45 years.
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 19:50:54   #
Toby wrote:
lorne wrote:
WoW someone else who trained with Monte Zucker... What I do at weddings and have been doing it for a long time is be Professional. I look at my conduct as a stage and I am trying to get more portraits and weddings from that event. I think the point is lost here. As a professional photgrapher I feel I am that good that I can normally take better images than the guest. I will organize the party into a group and then tell the guest they can take their phots first. After they are done flashing away then I go in and arrange the group the way I want it. I think if the professional photographer is that afraid of Uncle Bob out shinny him then he should get out of photgraphy. I usually pick up 1 or 2 portraits and every second wedding I book one of the Bridesmaid for their wedding. I am their to market myself and have the confidence that I will supply the Bride and Groom with fantastic images. I have no problem with the Uncle Bob"s it just makes me a better Photographer. Keep shooting Bob and have fun. Also forgot to mention every wedding I take I wear a Tuxedo, I joke with the Bride when they see me that if the Groom doesn't show up that I will fill in...These Professional Photgrapher are just chickens and in reality are more than likely not that good.
WoW someone else who trained with Monte Zucker... ... (show quote)


Now here's a guy that knows how to solve problems
quote=lorne WoW someone else who trained with Mon... (show quote)


Studied under Monte also. Learned how to shoot an organized wedding and let the moment happen.
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 19:47:06   #
oops!
Go to
Oct 27, 2012 10:14:23   #
I'm a pro of 45 years. I quit counting how many weddings I have done. Digital has completely changed the thinking of quality and experience. The price you pay for a professional is all relevant. You get what you pay for and it's a fine line if you are paying for the photographer's ego or the service and peace of mind he provides. I quote one of the bloggers "You pay peanuts you get monkeys"! As far as other photographers and contracts, I have gone against the grain for all my years. No contract but 2 consultations with both the B&G present. I tell them that other cameras are allowed but they must stay to the side, not next to me, only take pix when I lower my camera and I will not wait for them to take pictures. Before I made this rule I was photographing a wedding and it was a slew of cameras going off and one person stated "I would have gotten that picture but the photographer got in the way". I sat my camera down, walked up to the B&G and asked if they wanted me to photograph their wedding or them. They said they wanted me and didn't know how I put up with it this long. I asked if I could speak with them, they said by all means. I took control and there was no problem the rest of the day and I added it to my requests of the B&G and guests. There is a great responsibility put on the photographer of an event that won't happen again and cannot be retaken. A professional has an investment in his experience and equipment and is spending his time to make an event remembered for a lifetime. What he is paid can only be correct if him and the other party agrees it is a fair price. The party paying it is the one that has to be satisfied. It is not up to us as outsiders to criticize it. That price for some photographers is a steal but for other photographers it is out right stealing. Let the Bride and Groom have their day. Use the images they get to make the DVD. It's their decision. Do as they say or if they sign the contract do as it says. As I tell my B&G's, "It's your day, I am there to make it happen for you." As a professional photographer I have that control and it's up to me to make sure they have the memories.
Go to
Oct 1, 2012 09:00:01   #
I shoot raw 100%. I have a 5D and a 7D and I use Canon's DPP to process and it is fast. I shoot thousands of portrait images per year. Other than showing images immediately I see no reason to shoot in jpg. I never delete the original raw image. I would never want a jpg file to go back to, to re-work with it. Why compress then compress then compress, etc., etc., etc. Storage is to cheap to delete my raw files.
Go to
Sep 22, 2012 07:58:39   #
If it's really cold, keep an extra set of batteries next to your body or in a warm place. Keep your backup camera warm also. Keep a good lens cloth handy for when a lens goes from cold to warm or is it the other way around. Your bride and groom, as most are, are living in a fantasy world, they and you should be ready to tuff it up. Have a plan B for the weather. Keep the camera next to your body under a coat when not shooting. Have an assistant to help keep your stuff warm. Good luck & practice shooting in the cold. The stuff inside will be a piece of cake in comparison.
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 11:22:30   #
snow ball wrote:
Hi all, which is the difference in between the canon program
to the others programs to process RAW images


I assume you are talking about Canon DPP program. I have used DPP since 2004 and have used no other. Why? I had a guy work for me that had a Nikon and he said the DPP was much superior to anything he used to process his raw photos. Also have a professional that shoots Fuji and he said the same thing. DPP is fast, easy to use, batch processes, Batch exposure changes, Batch color corrections, on & on. This summer I did guests at a dude ranch where I shot from horse back for 5 hours, averaged 800 shots in raw, would get in by 4:00 pm, load shots onto computer, glance through them in DPP, would fix over & under exposures, delete mis-fires, highlight all of them & change their file names/numbers, highlight them all and batch process them to jpg of size I wanted for showing in a slide show and have them all ready for showing during dinner at 6:30 pm. If I would have shot them in jpg or tiff and had to change exposure it would take twice as long. It's a powerful program and it's free with your Canon camera. Feel free to email me at chrisjd@kci.net if you need help with it.
Go to
Sep 15, 2012 10:19:48   #
Some things learned from my mentors that figure out all the technical stuff. Never compromise on the shooting of the original image. Shoot at the max resolution (raw) not with a compressed image (jpg). Storage is cheap. I have 2 external hard drives at 1.5 terabytes each and each are mirrored storage so if one goes bad I have the other as back up. Never erase "on the fly" in your camera or as you are shooting. Always download images to your computer and storage as soon as possible. Never erase your camera memory card with your computer, do it in your camera and then always re-format the card in that camera after the files are erased. Always save the original uncompressed file and keep it to fall back on. Always work on an uncompressed file (raw, tiff) and not the compressed file (jpg). Every time you resave a jpg it recompresses it and you lose more information each time.
Go to
Sep 15, 2012 08:55:49   #
If you are using the program that came with your Canon called DPP(Digital Photo Professional) there is no reason to shoot both unless you need to view them on your computer right away. Yes, shooting both takes more room on your card. I am a working pro and shoot thousands of images per year and started out shooting both, but when I finally realized what all the Canon DPP program did I quit shooting the jpg and now only shoot raw. You should always keep your raw image and you can alter a raw with DPP. In DPP you can change the exposure of your raw image and each click adjusts the brightness, contrast, hue & saturation all together, in one click. If you work with a jpg you have to do each one of those separately. It will also adjust the sharpness separately and it can white balance the image also and it can batch process many images at one time. It is a fantastic program that is free with your Canon. I only use jpg for viewing & printing. If I work on the image in other programs that won't accept the raw I work from a tiff and not the jpg. That's another post entirely.
Go to
Sep 14, 2012 07:38:42   #
General rule of thumb for car pix: 45 degree angle or if from front, showing front and side. Lower angle like on your knee. Shade or overcast and the background the same light as your car. If you have glare off of chrome or glass, try a star filter or I think you can photo shop that in if you want. A telelphoto lens is better than a wide or normal.A little flash fill might help but can't over do the available light and won't work if you are to far away. But then all of this is only for general pix. By all means try the other suggestions and be creative.
Go to
Sep 12, 2012 08:44:26   #
I to have had this problem with 2 clients. I burned them in the option of "Like a USB Flash Drive" and I checked the discs and the images were there but they won't show up on an apple. One client took the disk to Kinkos and they transfered them for her but didn't tell her how. I do not know any one in my small town that has an apple and my 2 clients are half way across the United States so I can't readily check this out but I was told that if you use the other option "With a CD/DVD Player" (Mastered) that it would work. I would like to know for sure if that works.
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 08:02:44   #
How do you burn a DVD in a PC Windows 7 that will work in an apple? I shoot from horseback, pictures of guests riding, then sell them the images on a DVD. I have a couple of them that have Apple computers and my DVD won't work in their Apple?
Go to
Sep 6, 2012 07:56:08   #
to PalePictures:Do you just change the dpi to 72 and if someone wants to use that for facebook or view it on a computer, for instance, it will look great but if they try to print it, it will not look good? Or do you resize it also?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.