Great bridge pictures from all over the country. Here's one from Westfir, Oregon, two miles from home.
North Fork of The Willamette River at Westfir
Pedestrian walkway on the side.
Pedestrian entry on right.
Built in 1945, the "Office Bridge" connected a lumbermill with the office across the river. The mill is long gone and is now a picnic area on this side of the bridge.
rivernan wrote:
I have a mavica in a case on a book shelf too....now I am going to look at the links here.
We had a lot of fun with those back in the day. :)
JohnM wrote:
Glen wrote:
JohnM wrote:
I travel as much as I can by motorcycle to as many places as possible looking for the photo opp of the day. Landscape, fur, feathers, are all of interest. When dead of winter comes I resort to 4 wheel drive and river walks.
A rank amatur after more than 40 years of taking pictures I am in hopes of improved skills by associating with knowledgeable people like those I have seen here while watching your posts from the shadows.
JohnM, I share your interest in motorcycle riding photo ops. In 2000 my wife and I took a three month ride across the USA and back with a Sony Mavica in a pouch on my waste. Mailed floppy discs home by the bushell (only 12 photos to a disk). Very poor quality photos but the camera was state of the art at the time.
Here's a link to our trip if you'd care to check it out: http://grb.smugmug.com/2000/Ride-Across-America
I now have a Nikon D300, which I took on a ride to MT St Helens in Sept. Pics here: http://grb.smugmug.com/2011/Mount-ST-Helens-Ride
quote=JohnM I travel as much as I can by motorcyc... (
show quote)
Thank you so much for shareing, what great motorcycle tours and fantastic photos. and JFYI I still have a Mavica 5 in the case here. It never comes out but I have it :-)
quote=Glen quote=JohnM I travel as much as I can... (
show quote)
I still have my Mavica also :) ... it served me well for 4 years.
My Ride .... 1998 Road King Classic
rica wrote:
My 2003 VTX1800 with Dawg and trailer at Clackamas River Oregon. @25000miles
Does Dawg have "doggles"? Here's a picture of "Elam" sporting a pair at Waldo Lake in 2005.
Bruce H wrote:
one of my bikes and a favorite place to ride...
Great shots Bruce. Is that over in the Richmond area of Central Oregon?
JohnM wrote:
I travel as much as I can by motorcycle to as many places as possible looking for the photo opp of the day. Landscape, fur, feathers, are all of interest. When dead of winter comes I resort to 4 wheel drive and river walks.
A rank amatur after more than 40 years of taking pictures I am in hopes of improved skills by associating with knowledgeable people like those I have seen here while watching your posts from the shadows.
JohnM, I share your interest in motorcycle riding photo ops. In 2000 my wife and I took a three month ride across the USA and back with a Sony Mavica in a pouch on my waste. Mailed floppy discs home by the bushell (only 12 photos to a disk). Very poor quality photos but the camera was state of the art at the time.
Here's a link to our trip if you'd care to check it out: http://grb.smugmug.com/2000/Ride-Across-America
I now have a Nikon D300, which I took on a ride to MT St Helens in Sept. Pics here: http://grb.smugmug.com/2011/Mount-ST-Helens-Ride
Robert Lindsay wrote:
Thats neat !! Is that Alvin ???
Alvin was a chipmunk :) But you probably know that.
TaraMar wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I don't have CS5 and use LR3 for most of my post processing. I do have PS Elements 10 but LR really does most everything I need it to. I see what you mean about your photo looking darker now that I took a better look. That is strange.
Glen wrote:
TaraMar wrote:
Thank you Glen. Did you use the Dodge and Burn tool to achieve this effect? and thanks for posting the before and after so I could compare.
Glen wrote:
TaraMar wrote:
Curious as to what others think about this photo? Critiques?
I think it is a great/interesting composition but was also hit with the "too dark" thought. And, as Nighthawk did, I've taken the liberty to lighten it a little, but in keeping with the "mood" you intend I just isolated the man and his horn and left the rest as it was.
Thank you Glen. Did you use the Dodge and Burn to... (
show quote)
I used the "quick select tool" in Photoshop CS5 and "feathered" in the "refine edge" feature so as not to show an obvious line around the selected area. I do notice in looking at the before/after side by side that mine looks even darker, which puzzles me because I made no adjustments except to the man. ummm?
Forgot to mention .... when I made the selection, I used the "brighten" feature under "image adjustment". Didn't use the dodge tool.
quote=TaraMar Thank you Glen. Did you use the Do... (
show quote)
Thanks for the explanation. I don't have CS5 and ... (
show quote)
PS Elements should work just fine. Great photo.... keep up the good work.
TaraMar wrote:
Thank you Glen. Did you use the Dodge and Burn tool to achieve this effect? and thanks for posting the before and after so I could compare.
Glen wrote:
TaraMar wrote:
Curious as to what others think about this photo? Critiques?
I think it is a great/interesting composition but was also hit with the "too dark" thought. And, as Nighthawk did, I've taken the liberty to lighten it a little, but in keeping with the "mood" you intend I just isolated the man and his horn and left the rest as it was.
Thank you Glen. Did you use the Dodge and Burn to... (
show quote)
I used the "quick select tool" in Photoshop CS5 and "feathered" in the "refine edge" feature so as not to show an obvious line around the selected area. I do notice in looking at the before/after side by side that mine looks even darker, which puzzles me because I made no adjustments except to the man. ummm?
Forgot to mention .... when I made the selection, I used the "brighten" feature under "image adjustment". Didn't use the dodge tool. .....I didn't think of using the dodge tool. It might accomplish the same thing. I wonder though if it would create an unwanted "halo" around the guy?
TaraMar wrote:
Curious as to what others think about this photo? Critiques?
I think it is a great/interesting composition but was also hit with the "too dark" thought. And, as Nighthawk did, I've taken the liberty to lighten it a little, but in keeping with the "mood" you intend I just isolated the man and his horn and left the rest as it was.
woody14010 wrote:
My first sunset. Right out of the camera, any suggestions?
Beautiful color and sky texture.
It would be great if you could increase exposure at the bottom. If you have Photoshop you can fix that with layers ..... Especially if the original was taken in RAW .... over expose a copy to lighten the bottom, then merge it with the other.
EricLPT wrote:
The best way to shoot high contrast photos is HDR or High Dynamic Range. Most people overprocess their HDR to look fakey or cartoonish, don't do that. Google HDR for software choices and technique. The short version is take at least 3 photos +1, correct, -1 exposure (a tripod is a must) and then combine them with the software and tweak it a bit.
I experimented with HDR some but never liked it enough to pay for a program. As a result all my HDR pics have 'photomatix' watermarked across them because I'm using the free trial version. I've attached an HDR photo below, this would have been impossible with a single exposure, either the stained glass would have been overexposed or the cathedral interior would have been black.
Good luck and remember 'less is more' with HDR.
Eric
The best way to shoot high contrast photos is HDR ... (
show quote)
Eric, I share your view about HDR in that many look cartoonish, surreal. but sometimes that is the effect people are going for. In that case, there are some unique, interesting pictrues but again in a category of their own.
Your picture is great. I would not have known it was HDR if you'd not said. I have a question about the 3 exposures. Is it possible to take 1 photo in RAW and make two copies, increasing exposure on 1 and decreasing exposure on the other to get the three levels of exposure. The reason being you might not have the convenience to get three shots at the time and only realize later, with one photo, that HDR will save it?
kinsader wrote:
My son-in-law is in a quandary: Nikon D5000 or Canon T3i. I'm a Canon devotee and want to give him objective advice. Help will be appreciated. Thanks
The reason I use a Nikon is because I started out with one in 1972 and the accumlated lenses worked on my upgrades. Same was true when I got my first digital SLR. Had the lenses already so it was a no brainer to go with Nikon, although I have heard/read so many glowing reviews on Cannon I will try that route in my next life :)
Bobbee wrote:
Glen wrote:
architect wrote:
I got mine for $600 at a Black Monday sale on Amazon. It was a one day only thing, but it might be coming up this year too. I have been using Photoshop since Photoshop 7, and I learn something new almost every week. It comes with Adobe Camera RAW and Bridge too.
What is the meaning/purpose of "Bridge" ?
Bridg is a Photo Organizer. Hassome realy net fetures for viewing and organizing and cataloging andmanaging your photos. I brought Photoshop Cafe' on CD at a show and the fort 5-8 lessons were on Bridge. I have not stoped using it since. Like you can inport you pictures from a cmera in bridge and apply EXIL metadata to it such s copyright, name,ste righton the import. You can tag pictures with additonal metadata that you can group an search on.
quote=Glen quote=architect I got mine for $600 a... (
show quote)
Thanks Bobbee, I'll check it out.