Where is the OP? Has he bothered to check the responses to see the confusion he has created ? Not worthy of wasting any more time until he clarifies.
rmalarz wrote:
They are both nice. I would think it would depend on you intent for presentation. My personal preference is the first one, as it is much more like what I'm accustomed to seeing in real life. The second would be very good for a variety of illustrations.
--Bob
I agree with rmalarz also.
I use some of my Sony E lenses (aps-c) on my full frame A7Rii in crop mode. Yes, the shot will have less megapixels, but I still get the benefit of the A7Rii's better ISO, DR and color over my A6000. I am very pleased with the results I get.
Toment wrote:
Just got a new to me Rokinon Sony FE mount 35 mm f 2.8 lens.
Seems to work pretty well on my A6500.
Anybody else tried this lens?
Just askin'...
Thanks
No, but post some pics. I succumb easily to temptation.
Now that's a worthwhile upgrade !!! I'll take the old body off your hands if you aren't using it.
minniev wrote:
American photographer Diane Arbus has been described as the most radical photographer of the 20trh century. Her specialty was photographing marginalized or unusual looking people: circus performers, sideshow "freaks", prostitutes, nudists. Arbus took many noteworthy photographs of unusual people throughout her career, but this photograph of an awkward-looking child clutching a toy hand grenade remains one of her most enigmatic images. She has been accused of blatant sensationalism because of her preference for photographing these subjects. Much has been written and theorized about her attraction to the subjects she sought out, and I've linked some of these resources below. She is considered one of the most influential photographers of the 20th century, and her images have been displayed in MOMA, the Met, and most other prestigious venues. She had her own demons, and in 1971 committed suicide while still in her 40s.
"Child With A Toy Hand Grenade" is considered her most famous image. A signed print of this image of a rather peculiar looking child standing in Central Park holding a toy grenade, sold for $785,000 in 2015. Please share your thoughts about this unusual image. These questions may help you formulate your ideas.
1. Do you find this image appealing? Disturbing? How does it make you feel and why?
2. Does the selection of a child subject have affect your opinion in any way?
3. What do you think of the composition? The angle? The presentation?
4. What do you think about its recent monetary evaluation at $785,000? Is the value justified? Why or why not?
5. How do you feel about pictures of "marginalized people"? Do you take them yourself? Do share them? Feel free to share one of your images, or link to images of "marginalized people" that you think are quality images.
Links to Learn More
https://www.lomography.com/magazine/255096-influential-photographs-child-with-toy-hand-grenade-in-central-park-1962-by-diane-arbushttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Arbushttps://www.thecut.com/2016/07/diane-arbus-c-v-r.htmlhttp://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2016/diane-arbushttp://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/06/06/diane-arbus-portrait-of-a-photographerhttp://www.theartstory.org/artist-arbus-diane-artworks.htmNote: I'll be away for a couple of weeks, and am unsure how much internet access I'll have, so please don't feel unappreciated if my responses on this thread are a bit erratic. My husband and I will be with Graham and RG so, internet or not, we'll be in good hands and we'll be having fun in Scotland!American photographer Diane Arbus has been describ... (
show quote)
Obviously a picture from different times. If it was taken nowadays, we would be looking at the child's dead body on the ground surrounded by a SWAT team.
ediesaul wrote:
Critique welcomed. Not satisfied with background.
Thanks, all!
A couple of things come to mind.
1. Its a pity you didn't wait until the cloud had passed.
2. The heifer is too prominent to not be the subject of the shot, but as the subject it is lost and poorly exposed.
3. You have great eye to eye contact with the heifer, but I think you missed the opportunity to take full advantage of it.
4. Almost the entire right half of the frame is uninteresting. If the heifer was moving towards it it might serve some purpose, but she is obviously standing there looking at you.
I downloaded your picture and did some edits in PS for practice and to test my theories. I am not a frequent visitor to this section so I am not sure of the etiquette of posting edits to your picture. I apologize for any offense in posting my results.
Much better!! Lovely shot. Thanks for posting it.
Base_fiddle wrote:
I'm trying to learn how to take better pics. I've been learning to use A mode and had some success. I would appreciate some critique of compositions - there are three pictures below taken at Peggy's Cove, Nova Scotia. The subject is the same. I know that my LR editing differs...I can work on that. For now, I'd appreciate understanding which composition is better and why.
I think #2 has the most potential. However I would crop out most of the uninteresting dock on the left and crop out a some of the uninteresting sky to move the horizon off center. The boats, the sheds on the right and the reflections on the water are the interesting parts. Also, I would have tried to shoot from a point a little more to the left in order to show a bit more of the opening to the water beyond the harbor which would help to lead you more into the picture.
mksutton wrote:
Bass Harbor Light, Maine.
I think you forgot to take the lens cap off !!!
While you still can, click on 'Edit'
Then 'Choose File' ; find your file, click the box for 'store original' and then 'add attachment'. Then click on 'Update'. You only have a 30 minute window to edit the original post.
Fabulous1too wrote:
I misplaced my camera battery for my canon 5d mk3 and saw a used battery from adorama for $26, new would be $64. Is there something wrong with buying a used battery? Adorama gives me a 30 day satisfaction warranty on it, anyone ever had this experience?
I think a nice camera like that deserves a new battery. Get the used one as a back-up.