Posts: lamontcranston | Ugly Hedgehog

Excessive use of post processing

Bob Locher wrote:

My major interest in photography is scenics. I lov... (show quote)

I couldn't agree with you more Bob. I respect those who love to create their idea of "beauty" with over-processing but too often I see "art" that just hurts my eyes to look at it. To each his/her own.

Mar 26, 2018 13:39:44 #

DaveO wrote:

I just received this email from Nikon Tech Support... (show quote)

Good info. Thanks DaveO. I wonder what they would charge to replace the internal battery? On second thought, I probably don't want to know.

Mar 25, 2018 09:59:48 #

Raz Theo wrote:

You're a hoot Kmgw9v. And succinct.

That's certainly one way to describe him.

Mar 24, 2018 12:12:30 #

Wilsondl3 wrote:

I left my Nikon D80 in storage long enough for the internal battery to run down. I get an err message and the only way to get it to work again is to have the battery replaced witch would cost more than a used camera on eBay! Nikon could have at least had a warning. - Dave

Good info. Thank you. I think I have read that the internal battery is charged by the main battery so I think my idea to store cameras without the main battery installed may be a bad idea. Thanks to all for the informative replies.

Mar 24, 2018 10:56:33 #

Longshadow wrote:

I agree with IDguy. Mine only loose time/date (the clock no longer runs). Saved settings remain intact.

That makes sense. When setting up a new camera, time/date are the first things you enter. Thanks.

I'm wondering how long the saved settings will remain intact with no battery installed?

Mar 24, 2018 10:14:12 #

Simple question. How long will a Sony or a Nikon retain it's internal settings if it is stored without the batteries being installed in it? I ask because I have a couple of cameras that may not be used for months and I think it may be a good idea to store them with the batteries removed but I would hate for them to lose all of their internal settings.

Mar 24, 2018 09:42:22 #

Experience with aftermarket (non - OEM) camera batteries. Short survey - Results

Thanks for the detailed summary of your project. I find it interesting that Wasabi and Watson are just about tied in their positive ratings.

Mar 24, 2018 09:29:58 #

B+W UV Filter

tonyi wrote:

Hello would like to get your opinion on the use of a B+W UV filter. I am new to photography and was just wondering if it was necessary to get one.

I use B&W UV filters on all of my lenses. They are not necessary as most people will tell you but I like them because they keep dust, dirt, and other contaminants off of the front elements of my lenses and I would rather clean a filter than the front element of my lenses. B&W are top quality filters and are reasonably priced but have little or no effect on your photos. I like them simply for the protection they provide for my expensive lenses.

Mar 21, 2018 16:29:41 #

Camera Genuine Brand Batteries

I have used Wasabi batteries in my Nikon D3300 for a long time with no adverse results. I buy them on eBay at a fraction of the cost of the OEM batteries.

For the other guys: I use UV or Clear filters on all my lenses for protection. I also wear a belt AND suspenders. Can't be too careful.😋

Mar 21, 2018 16:16:40 #

" Auto Mode "

cjc2 wrote:

Would it be possible for the two of you to go private with this nonsense. I'm NOT taking sides here, but these posts add nothing for the rest of us. As far as I am concerned, you are BOTH wrong.

AMEN!! 👍👍👍

Mar 21, 2018 09:42:26 #

Tamron 18-270mm Lens

I've had the Tamron 18-270 for 3 months now and it has performed very well on my Nikon D3300. I've been very happy with it. It is an excellent walk-around lens and I have not experienced any lens creep with it yet but I expect I will as the lens gets more use. It's a non-issue though since it has a lens lock that works very well.

Too much post processing?

Mar 20, 2018 09:35:58 #

(Photo Gallery)

It's a beautiful image. Not over processed at all. I like it just the way it is.

Exposure Value - No metering used

Mar 17, 2018 09:41:17 #

(Photo Gallery)

Excellent post with beautiful photos. You can nearly always depend on the Sunny 16 rule. That little Sunny 16 insert Kodak used to include in their boxes of film was a great crutch back in the 60's when most cameras didn't have exposure meters. Thanks for an interesting post.

Mar 7, 2018 11:28:56 #

SLR to mirrorless

gwilliams6 wrote:

I recommend the new Sony A7III. I Cheers

The A7III is an excellent choice. I was interested in weight and price when I was considering a Sony mirrorless camera. I went with the A6000.

A7III body only. 650 grams

A6000 body only. 344 grams

Another factor was price. The A7III is roughly twice the price of the A6000.

Mar 7, 2018 08:48:32 #

SLR to mirrorless

If you are looking for simplicity and are on a budget and want to get your feet wet with an excellent quality mirrorless camera that produces excellent results, take a look at the Sony A6000. It can be had with an excellent 18-55 kit lens at a bargain price from B&H or Adorama. I have 2 of them and my Nikon now sits on the shelf and rarely gets used.