Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Exposure Value - No metering used
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 17, 2018 07:53:20   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
These photos were all taken last Saturday with a Nikon Df and Tamron 35mm f/1.8 lens. They were all developed from raw with Capture One Pro 11.

No exposure was metered in the camera. The exposure values were determined by estimation starting from the Sunny 16 rule for full sun.

All at ISO 400.

Full sun 1/1000 f/11, some shadow recovery
Full sun 1/1000 f/11, some shadow recovery...
(Download)

Full sun 1/1000 f/11 some shadow recovery
Full sun 1/1000 f/11 some shadow recovery...
(Download)

Full sun, 1/1000 f/11 some shadow recovery
Full sun, 1/1000 f/11 some shadow recovery...
(Download)

Partly cloudy, 1/1000 f/8, some shadow recovery
Partly cloudy, 1/1000 f/8, some shadow recovery...
(Download)

More cloudy, 1/500 f/8, some highlight and shadow recovery
More cloudy, 1/500 f/8, some highlight and shadow ...
(Download)

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:03:17   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Ahhh ... real photographic skills in use.

Excellent.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:06:48   #
Rich2236 Loc: E. Hampstead, New Hampshire
 
selmslie wrote:
These photos were all taken last Saturday with a Nikon Df and Tamron 35mm f/1.8 lens. They were all developed from raw with Capture One Pro 11.

No exposure was metered in the camera. The exposure values were determined by estimation starting from the Sunny 16 rule for full sun.

All at ISO 400.


Thanks selmslie, those pics of the MG brought back memories... I owned 2. The first one was a 1953 MGTD MK2 with wire wheels. And the second was a 1955 MGTF1500. Both of those cars would get upwards of 90,000 in todays market. But i did love driving them.
Rich...

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 08:30:18   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
The Sunny 16 rule (or equivalent exposure) has always worked. Nobody needs a meter on a sunny or a clear cloudy day.
Just follow Sunny 16.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:32:13   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
camerapapi wrote:
The Sunny 16 rule (or equivalent exposure) has always worked. Nobody needs a meter on a sunny or a clear cloudy day.
Just follow Sunny 16.

You don't need ETTR or EBTR either.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:35:49   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
selmslie wrote:
These photos were all taken last Saturday with a Nikon Df and Tamron 35mm f/1.8 lens. They were all developed from raw with Capture One Pro 11.

No exposure was metered in the camera. The exposure values were determined by estimation starting from the Sunny 16 rule for full sun.

All at ISO 400.


That is a mind meter. All manual as you say Sunny 16 rule. I used that a lot with B&W film in the day, less so with Slide film. Bracket a little and it will do the job even today!

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:36:37   #
Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast
 
Beautiful photos, great technique

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 09:41:17   #
lamontcranston
 
Excellent post with beautiful photos. You can nearly always depend on the Sunny 16 rule. That little Sunny 16 insert Kodak used to include in their boxes of film was a great crutch back in the 60's when most cameras didn't have exposure meters. Thanks for an interesting post.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 10:15:12   #
pesfls Loc: Oregon, USA
 
Old truths remain so. Great looking show.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:50:44   #
toxdoc42
 
Great shots. Care to show the pre-processing images?

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:44:34   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
toxdoc42 wrote:
Great shots. Care to show the pre-processing images?

I am happy to. Here are the JPEG versions straight from the camera with no processing on the computer other than to resize them. As you can see, all but the last one is deliberately underexposed a little which is why all of them needed a little boost in the shadows. Even the last one, which needed a little highlight recovery, is pretty close to correctly exposed.

None of these got the full treatment that I gave to the raw conversion which included some adjustment for clarity and structure.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 12:52:53   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
toxdoc42 wrote:
Great shots. Care to show the pre-processing images?

And here is one of the camera's JPEG images with some post processing in Picture Window Pro to adjust the exposure and shadows using only the 8-bit JPEG.

It's still not the full treatment I gave to the raw images using Capture One Pro but it demonstrates that there is a lot you can do with a JPEG without resorting to the raw file.

It does not mean that highlight and shadow detail that the camera discarded can be recovered as you can when developing from raw. However, if you are more aggressive (I had it set to Normal) in your application of Active_D lighting you can come pretty close.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 18, 2018 06:52:11   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
I'm a Corvette guy thru and thru, but have to say that Ford GT looks hot.

Reply
Mar 18, 2018 07:18:37   #
fourg1b2006 Loc: Long Island New York
 
Fantastic looking automobiles....you captured them very well. Nice work.

Reply
Mar 18, 2018 08:13:50   #
Largobob
 
selmslie wrote:
These photos were all taken last Saturday with a Nikon Df and Tamron 35mm f/1.8 lens. They were all developed from raw with Capture One Pro 11.

No exposure was metered in the camera. The exposure values were determined by estimation starting from the Sunny 16 rule for full sun.

All at ISO 400.


Very nice images. My heart leans toward the two E-Type Jaguars (last two images). I still have a Signal-red, '69 XKE 4.3 liter coupe in pristine shape.....which I drive several times a month. Will squeal rubber in three gears.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.