Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Leitz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 246 next>>
Mar 9, 2015 04:06:22   #
bkblaw wrote:
I have a Sony NEX 3N - what lens cleaner would be recommended?


Lens cleaners are not generally recommend for cleaning cameras.
Go to
Mar 8, 2015 12:27:41   #
amfoto1 wrote:
I use a Tokina zoom on my Canon cameras, alongside several Canon zooms. When I first bought it I was concerned that the "reversed zoom ring direction" of the Tokina (which is same as Nikon) might be a problem in the field. But I honestly don't think I ever notice the difference.

I wonder if the zoom ring direction would change if you were south of the equator, the way the water in the toilet swirls in the opposite direction? ;) I also can't help but wonder which direction the water swirls if you live directly on the equator? :roll:

I've travelled to several countries where they drive on the "wrong side" of the road... And, no, the pedals are in the same place in either case. One problem I had was the shift lever... It felt really awkward using my left hand instead of my right (solution is to rent an automatic, rather than a stick shift!). I also had trouble using the mirror when backing up... ended up in the wrong lane a few times. Also, remembering which way to go around roundabouts is fun (and can be quite exciting when you get it wrong).

In London you'll see arrows and signs on the sidewalk at crossings, telling pedestrians which way to look before stepping out into traffic. Apparently more than a few people have gotten run over while looking the wrong direction for oncoming cars.
I use a Tokina zoom on my Canon cameras, alongside... (show quote)


It's best to not drive OR walk in London!!
Go to
Mar 8, 2015 09:54:49   #
pilotboat wrote:
My grandson was in the state championship BB tournament. I wanted to get some action shots. The gym was a middle school
gym of typical size and height. The lighting was overhead fluorescent.

I am using a Canon D60 with a Canon 70 to 200 mm , F4, L series lens. I set the white balance to fluorescent and was using a tripod as a monopod.

I could not get any shot that was clearly focused when shot with the lens set to it max. I tried TV, AV, and action modes. ASA was set at 3200.

Was I overextending the ability of the gear? Or crisp shots are not possible under the circumstances?

Any thoughts??
My grandson was in the state championship BB tourn... (show quote)


Nothing you have mentioned, white balance, AV, TV, ISO, etc., would affect the focus.
More information is needed to offer suggestions.
Go to
Mar 8, 2015 09:30:11   #
rustfarmer wrote:
I'm not sure which of us you are responding to romantic16, but I did not mean to blame the viewfinder. Daughter has been at a research facility in the amazon as well as other very damp areas in rather primative situations for several months. Now that she is back in a city for a while, just wants to know the best way to help prevent damage as much as possible. I have searched for a repair facility in her area and it seems there is not a Nikon authorized one. She says there are camera shops, but none she would trust. She thinks it might not be that difficult to remove the viewfinder but has no idea how to do it.
I'm not sure which of us you are responding to rom... (show quote)


The D3100 does not have a removable viewfinder.
Go to
Mar 8, 2015 06:48:33   #
skingfong wrote:
I used to work in a TV studio running camera. Whenever I had to zoom in, I would turn the zoom clockwise to zoom in or tighten up. This always made sense to me because when you want to go tight, turn clockwise. If you want to go loose, turn counter clockwise.

I used my Canon 24-105 lens for the first time to shoot video. I realized turning the zoom ring is opposite. Damn near got me every time I had to zoom. I went the wrong direction. Turning the ring on the lens clockwise zooms out while turning it counter clockwise zooms in. I wish Canon would have engineered their zooms the other way. :-(
I used to work in a TV studio running camera. When... (show quote)


What would happen if you moved your focusing hand 180°?
Go to
Mar 8, 2015 06:39:01   #
joer wrote:
If I take a photo with a 420mm equivalent lens and crop away everything but 10% of the image is the effective focal length 4200mm?


Shoot a scene with a 420mm lens, then with a 4,200mm lens, and compare the difference. (Yes, I am no mathematician!)
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 12:01:18   #
big-guy wrote:
I wouldn't waste my time with someone else's photos. Put em up as is and if people squawk then tell em the truth.

Just make sure your portion of the job is a quality product.


I defy anyone to top your reply! :thumbup:
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 08:56:24   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Hi Jerry. I have both of those lenses as well, I lucked out & got both for around $600. Might I ask if the 80-200 is a push-pull or the 2 ring version ?... I have the 2 ring & like it better than the older push-pull version. They both have the same optics, but the newer 2 ring has a tripod foot as well.


Scott, the D lens is a 2-ring. The 1-ring's auto focus was slow and clunky, the D lens is fast and smooth even without a built-in motor. It's great on my Df.
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 08:39:56   #
RGH wrote:
The thread was writing about a great landscape lens that turned into a lens for interior photos and to interior church photos. From there I brought up my 24 PC-E. That lens is fantastic for all of the above.


Well, the OP specified 20mm. But yes, for interior work especially, the PC-E would also be my first choice.
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 07:49:18   #
BeachLady wrote:
I need a birthday present for my boyfriend who wants to take great BIFs. He's using Nikon 5100, and sharing lenses with me (7100). We have 18-55 & 55-300 standard with camera, Tamaron 18-200, and 150-600 (I use that one! -- MY birthday present last month!!)

What one other lens should we have (that won't break the bank!!) Thanks!


While your bank account may groan, an ED prime telephoto lens will outperform your variable aperture zoom lenses any day. Since you already have it though, you'd probably want to keep the 150-600 Tamron.
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 07:30:33   #
danielb59 wrote:
Not sure if this is the correct section but here goes. My old 20/21 inch HP monitor just died (quite suddenly). I am writing this using a much older 17 inch monitor with my desktop. My question concerns the purchase of a new monitor. Based on budget and space limitations, I find that I a new replacement monitor cannot exceed a $200 and 23/24". I am a hobbyist but do take a lot of photos of flowers, grandchildren, other people, landscapes, etc. I do some limited post processing and have Lightroom 4 and Elements 11. I would like to purchase a new monitor as soon as possible. I have Googled a search and find that there are almost limitless candidates. I am not aligned with any particular name brand or model at this point. Any suggestions or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
Dan
Not sure if this is the correct section but here g... (show quote)


When my monitor died recently, I simply bought a replacement. In my case, an HP 22xi, £130 at Staples.
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 07:17:08   #
neilds37 wrote:
Excuse me for butting in, but I feel like a student eavesdropping on a conversation between two Professors. From what I gather, Dr. Dave has presented a class to the 101 level, and Dr. Floyd is comparing this to material for a 435 class.

Please correct me if i'm wrong and I'll go quietly back to my corner.


It is unfortunate that one's obstinance refuses to allow the thread to progress.
Go to
Mar 6, 2015 05:01:44   #
RGH wrote:
No one has mentioned my favorite lens. Nikon 24mm PC-E.


Could that possibly be because this thread is not about a 24 PC-E??
Go to
Mar 5, 2015 15:25:00   #
GoldenOne wrote:
Thanks, I am thinking of a Canon 65mm f/2.8 MP-5 lens on a Canon EOS camera body. I havent decided which model to get yet?????????


That looks like an incredible lens, and being able to stop down for depth of field is a major advantage over a point and shoot. I'm not familiar with Canon cameras, so can offer no suggestions there. I don't think they make a bad one.
Go to
Mar 5, 2015 13:54:23   #
GoldenOne wrote:
I have a website northernnevadagold.com that I use to sell my Mineral Specimens. First step is to photograph the pieces then load to my site.


In that case, I would say that nearly any camera similar to your defunct Fuji will more than suffice. Rather than suggest a particular model, I would suggest you check online a store such as B&H or similar, where you can compare specifications and prices. Good luck!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 246 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.