Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: A.J.R.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 next>>
Jun 4, 2014 05:45:38   #
Check out Tenba, Kata and Tamrac. Ive successfully used them all and have also owned a Hasselblad with 80 and 50mm lenses.
Go to
May 29, 2014 11:42:03   #
dparker708 wrote:
Hi A.J.R.
I've got the same printer with a blinking orange light with a message saying something needs cleaning. I tried doing it from the computer with no luck. Any idea how to do it?


Have a look at the manual

ftp://download.epson-europe.com/pub/download/3279/epson327915eu.pdf

Page 11 shows the control panel (1 & 8 mentions Flashing lights)
Hope this might help
Go to
May 29, 2014 06:03:29   #
I have had the Epson R3000 for over a year now, expensive but well worth the money. Probably wont find a better quality A3+ printer for the price though. Uses larger capacity ink cartridges cutting down on changing them after only making a few prints.
Go to
May 22, 2014 05:52:12   #
The reason that it would be best for only one catch light to show in the eye is that it is more natural. One sun would show one catch light. Likewise your photograph will be unnatural if your multiple speed lights cast more than one shadow. There should be one main light and the other guns should fill in shadow areas, unless of course you are trying for some special effect.
Go to
May 8, 2014 06:21:39   #
There are so many and it depends so much on the type of photography. I love the work of Edward Weston, Brett Weston, Irving Penn and many others photographing different types of subject matter, but my favorite subject matter is that which photographers such as Brassi and Robert Doisneau are famous for, so they rank near the top of my favorites. But more recently I have admired the work of Vivian Maier. If you have not seen her work do take a look.
http://www.vivianmaier.com/
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 12:43:03   #
Some of the greatest street photographers were French, Brassai, Robert Doisneau, Carttier-Bresson but also Vivian Maier's photographs taken mainly in New York are amongst some of the best of this genre. Sadly it is much more difficult now to have the freedom to take these type of pictures. It would be difficult for example to take photographs like Doisneau's 'Children, Place Hebert (1957) or Carttier-Bresson's Sunday Morning Errand (1958), but if shots like these hadn't been taken we would have lost a lot of great photographs.

In the 60's I took many photographs in pubs in the East end of London, mainly unobserved, but occasionally some one would object but treated with respect would except my explanation, (sometimes an offer of a drink would help). It would be difficult to take pictures in the same way now.
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 10:58:58   #
Crwiwy wrote:
Same question for UK sites - and include lens etc?


WEX, Park Cameras, and for second hand Ffords. Have also bought from Bristol Cameras and Amazon with success.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 16:17:54   #
lindmike wrote:
Gotcha Ameha. Thanks alot


Sorry that should read - subject
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 16:15:45   #
lindmike wrote:
Amehta,
What does the 1:1 ratio mean in Macro? I know it relates to magnification, but unsure as to how.

Thanks,
Mike


The same size as the original suject.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 11:15:49   #
gemlenz wrote:
I have a 7D and 6D

I think a 85mm would be a bit better for portraits on your 7D (equivalent to about 135mm on your 6D, full frame) and of course you could use bellows to get in closer, but it would not give as good results as a lens design for macro use.
A longer lens does allows for easier positioning of lights when working close.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 06:07:14   #
gemlenz wrote:
I have a Canon 100mm macro lens that I use for macro and portraits. It's a great lens. I was wondering if an 85mm f/1.8 would work as a macro lens. Anybody have experience with that?


What is your camera sensor size?
Go to
Feb 14, 2014 10:50:48   #
I have the Epson V750. Good scanner, giving excellent quality results. (although the Neg/transparency holders could be better made).
Go to
Feb 7, 2014 11:58:07   #
cranepix wrote:
Perhaps he should be drawn and 1/4 rd. , or even worse, be forced to listen to a lecture by you on ELEMENTS of STYLE, by Strunk and White, and the Chicago Manual of Style, U of C Press, so he learns how to really communicate, and be heard and still not get his tripod answer. By A.J.R. I am sure your wife and children just love you !


I thought you were in agreement with me, looking at your post-

'Your answer to the poor guy about using capitals is just KA KA !'

and mine-

'Roy asked a question. Why it cannot be answered without him being criticized for using capitals (by Bob and Morning Star) I do not know. I feel sorry that he is made to feel bad about something so trivial. I have now fallen into the same trap of wasting everyone's time and not answering his question.'

So I'm not sure what you mean by above, especially

'By A.J.R. I am sure your wife and children just love you !'

A. J. R.
Go to
Feb 7, 2014 05:41:10   #
Kuzano wrote:
It's not as trivial as you think. Research has shown that (aside from the "shouting" aspect, which I agree is trivial), on a more important note, that our comprehension of text based on all caps is very poor. So it may not be that people are offended... they are just naturally not getting full comprehension of the question.

This issue with comprehension may be more the reason why nobody is responding. Many just don't catch the impact or mission of the question.

I feel the majority of the posts regarding the All Caps issue were polite and well stated, but there is actually a more apppropriate issue. Same studies show that the two most comprehensible font are Times New Roman and Helvetica, so far as getting your message or question understood.

Now this may also seem trivial to you, but it's a big factor in communication and marketing. No fancy fonts and Upper/Lower case conventions, increase effective communication. That alone is significant in a world where we are not communicating face to face.

Now add proper spelling, short concise sentences, and many paragraph breaks and you have covered most of the offenses that detract from understanding communication on the internet.

I'm certainly not following my own advice all the time, but I try.
It's not as trivial as you think. Research has sho... (show quote)


With respect the criticisms were that Roy was shouting (which you agree is trivial), not that the question could not be understood because it was written in capitals. There has been a good response so I would be surprised if anyone had problems reading and understanding the question.
Of course some fonts are easier to read than others, but I find the biggest problem in understanding some of the questions posted is when the author does not take a bit of time to think through how best to word the question. It does not have to be grammatically correct to make clear what is being asked but sometimes the odd word that has not been spelt right (sorry to mention it but ‘same studies show’ I think should read some studies show) can throw me.
Go to
Feb 6, 2014 07:42:39   #
Roy asked a question. Why it cannot be answered without him being criticized for using capitals (by Roy and Morning Star) I do not know. I feel sorry that he is made to feel bad about something so trivial. I have now fallen into the same trap of wasting everyone's time and not answering his question.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.