Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tenny52
Page: <<prev 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 next>>
Dec 25, 2017 16:10:58   #
I just got my Nikkor 300mm with a stamped serial #53800(1977-1981), so it is a Ai model per
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/lenses.html#SuperZoom
It supposedly has a aperture stop of f4.5 - 22, but somehow when I put it on my D610, I can dial it as 2.8-16.
I notice that Nikon has a f2.8 IF-ED model for the same year, but I don't think mine belongs to this model.
Can anyone tell me what is going on, and how can I tell if mine is a real f2.8 or actually a f4.5
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 23:04:03   #
In many cases, I blow my hot breath or lick onto the filter, does it terrify anybody? Of course, I don't owe any B&W filter, only Hoya or cheaper ones.
I always find Vivitar filter package very price reasonable, 3 pieces including cir polarized for about $15 any size, which claims multi-coated glass. So whenever, I acquire a lens with different ring size, I bought a new Vivitar package.
Can I use tap water or alcohol besides lens cleaning fluid, which I always find the bottle dried up because I seldom use it.
Go to
Dec 12, 2017 14:27:20   #
I think Nikon's purpose is to keep the D610 owners happy that their camera didn't depreciate even after 2 years.
I bought mine new from this company in April 2015 during a short period sale for $1099(no tax, no shipping).
Now its regular price is a little higher.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nikon-D610-24-3-MP-CMOS-FX-Format-Digital-SLR-Camera-Body-Only-/231394553598?hash=item35e030aefe.
The conclusion, Nikon didn't depreciate over time. It is a collector's choice.
Go to
Dec 11, 2017 22:41:29   #
thanks, can anyone tell me the difference with that 55-300mm and the other 70-300mm which is much cheaper?
Go to
Dec 11, 2017 19:16:25   #
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice, but it is too expensive to my liking of birds. I think NG photographers probably use that to shoot eagle snapping up a fish.
The 55-300mm DX looks right, but it seems a little wasteful since it overlaps a partial range portion of my fx 70-200mm.
Would a 300mm DX is equivalent to a FF 400mm with an effective pixel count of 18000 down from 24000?
What would it be like looking through a DX lens on my D610? Does it still occupy the whole view finder or only partially?
Go to
Dec 11, 2017 16:29:52   #
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?
Go to
Dec 3, 2017 01:29:54   #
Great big moon, looks like a good moon shot can be taken anywhere and anytime. I shoot with my D610, so the moon shall look further.
Go to
Dec 3, 2017 00:20:28   #
it is very artistic, I have never been able to shoot a moon that big respective to a building. Next time when I travel, I should bring my long lens which only a 70-200, should that be enough?
Did you use long exposure and long lens?
Go to
Dec 2, 2017 20:05:59   #
What are the better gears and settings for shooting the moon?
Moon with distant landscape?
Moon with people's face?
It would be nice with a demo picture.
Go to
Dec 2, 2017 18:48:09   #
how come it is so yellow, may I ask what is your gears, at what setting?
Go to
Nov 29, 2017 19:37:00   #
you need a storage shed; just kidding, outdoor moisture and temperature is not good to your lens.
I find this very efficient, it has removeable individual bins inside for your bigger lens, and they are stackable.
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Husky-16-1-2-in-8-Bin-Deep-Pro-Organizer-Black-218401/203329198
Go to
Nov 29, 2017 19:17:07   #
I think you need to research also full frame or cropped? and which brand has better lens available (used, new, full frame, cropped, prime, zoom, manual/ auto Focus) per cost wise too.
It is the same idea of buying which brand of printer, color or BW? inkjet or laser ?; you also need to find out, where you can buy ink/toner cartridges, genuine or generic?
In my humble opinion, since Nikon exists longer, it has plenty of FX used lens from the film era and sellers from Japan on ebay.
I paid $1100 for my NiKon(D610) new in 4/2015 and my full time lens is AF 24-85MM used for $175 from ebay.
Go to
Nov 27, 2017 14:18:52   #
I shoot RAW+jpg. I use the output-jpg of the LR to compare with the camera-jpg. Sometimes I have trouble to surpass the camera-jpg. My LP-jpg could be off the color as the tinting could make the picture too red or green and I wouldn't perceive that without a reference.
I am a Faststone user and I found its tool:bath-convert-size feature is very useful for resizing a group of jpgs for email.
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 06:45:04   #
make sure when you open the LR, the label "Photoshop Lightroom Classic" is there. You may have opened an older version LR 6
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 05:08:37   #
/.?thank you folks, now the usage of LR Collections is much clearer to me. I am only a hobbyist. I have been using Faststone to download my photos, which creates a folder according to the date of the pictures taken. Unforturnately, FS does not have the tagging capability, so I just change the name of the folder to [date-event] and most of the times I will delete the raw files so there is no need to tag names to them. In the future, if I need to keep the raw files and categorize them, then I probably use LR collections. I think Bridge of PS allows tags to the pictures, which I didnot learn to use it yet.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.