Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Bird lens
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 11, 2017 16:29:52   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:33:26   #
vonzip Loc: cape cod
 
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:41:16   #
whwiden
 
vonzip wrote:
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.


Works on fx or dx. Consider Tamron 150-600mm G2.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2017 16:42:52   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
The 200-500 is a good choice...it is an FX lens. I also use the newly acquired Tamron 150-600 G2 and it appears, so far, that the 200-500 is quicker to focus.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:46:06   #
runakid Loc: Shelbyville, TN
 
Nikon 200-500 is perfect- in my opinion.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:51:00   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
On a budget, the Nikkor 55-300 AFS VR zoom. 50% more reach, light enough for handheld, used on ebay for about $250.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:53:20   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?

Backyard birds or something else? backyard birds won't require lenses that long. I shoot them with a 300mm F4 Nikkor AF or shorter. What focal length will depend on what birds & how close...

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2017 19:16:25   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice, but it is too expensive to my liking of birds. I think NG photographers probably use that to shoot eagle snapping up a fish.
The 55-300mm DX looks right, but it seems a little wasteful since it overlaps a partial range portion of my fx 70-200mm.
Would a 300mm DX is equivalent to a FF 400mm with an effective pixel count of 18000 down from 24000?
What would it be like looking through a DX lens on my D610? Does it still occupy the whole view finder or only partially?

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 21:55:40   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
The 55-300 is equivalent to a 450mm on a FF. What you see on the DX is what you would see at 450mm on a FF. It occupies the whole frame. I never used my 55-200 again after I got the 55-300. The lens will work well on any Nikon DX camera of any MP. I got my 55-300 used on ebay for about $250.

tenny52 wrote:
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice, but it is too expensive to my liking of birds. I think NG photographers probably use that to shoot eagle snapping up a fish.
The 55-300mm DX looks right, but it seems a little wasteful since it overlaps a partial range portion of my fx 70-200mm.
Would a 300mm DX is equivalent to a FF 400mm with an effective pixel count of 18000 down from 24000?
What would it be like looking through a DX lens on my D610? Does it still occupy the whole view finder or only partially?
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice,... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 22:41:29   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
thanks, can anyone tell me the difference with that 55-300mm and the other 70-300mm which is much cheaper?

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:08:02   #
Jim Bob
 
vonzip wrote:
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.


It's a full frame lens but works extremely well on DX with the 1.5 crop factor.

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2017 08:09:41   #
Jim Bob
 
DaveO wrote:
The 200-500 is a good choice...it is an FX lens. I also use the newly acquired Tamron 150-600 G2 and it appears, so far, that the 200-500 is quicker to focus.


My observations as well. The Sigma 150-600 Contemporary is also quicker to focus than the G2.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:55:19   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Jim Bob wrote:
My observations as well. The Sigma 150-600 Contemporary is also quicker to focus than the G2.


I use manual focus with the G2 for birds not in flight or when using the 1.4X. It is easy enough to do. I need fairly decent light with the max aperture at F9. I have only used it on the D500.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:55:50   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?


I guess it depends on your budget.
I use the Sigma 100-400mm on my D7200.
You don't want to use a DX lens on your FX D610.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 09:51:26   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?


Your camera has a FF sensor so no crop factor. If it's just birds, I'd look for a prime at 300mm or 400mm with a 1.4 or 1.5 power converter. A budget limit will reduce the quality and the speed but I don't think it would be any worse than a budget telephoto zoom. The 1.5X converter would get you out to 600mm on a 400mm prime.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.