SteveR wrote:
At the time, that individual also had a twelve year suspended sentence for selling drugs and was on five years probation. Having violated her probation by putting her kid in the school, she plea bargained and took the five years. This detail wasn't made clear in the story by the journalist because it didn't fit his/her agenda.
Also...ask Martha Stewart about this advantage for the wealthy.
And so you think the woman's sentence was fair? Let's use the judge's word from Felicity Huffman's very case: "I am having trouble finding who was harmed here." So tell me: who do YOU think was harmed?
You, sir, are obviously part of the problem...not the solution. And stating that the journalist "had an agenda" tells me exactly what your problem is.