Posts for: aubreybogle
Aug 21, 2019 23:02:08 #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
I'm guessing that's a typo, 70D II.
I've had mine even longer and I still like it and it has never disappointed me either, although I think I hurt its feelings when I shitched it from handheld shooting to tripod mounted. I switched to the D500 for handheld shooting, primary because of lenses and weight and the D500's newer technology. But I still use my 7D mk II.
I've had mine even longer and I still like it and it has never disappointed me either, although I think I hurt its feelings when I shitched it from handheld shooting to tripod mounted. I switched to the D500 for handheld shooting, primary because of lenses and weight and the D500's newer technology. But I still use my 7D mk II.
Yep late night typo. Thanks for pointing it out.
Aug 20, 2019 22:51:14 #
mwsilvers wrote:
The 7D II is faster with a more professional and robust build with a joystick and pro level weather sealing. The more inexpensive 80D is a bit smaller and has a better sensor.
I travel internationally quite a bit. I chose the 70D II for its build quality and weatherproofing, and after 2 years or so, have never been disappointed.
Aug 20, 2019 22:35:56 #
nadelewitz wrote:
Re #1 There is an old rule to live by.....
Every generation of an image loses something from the previous generation.
The "original" scene is the "real" image. The negative on film does not contain all of the information of the original scene.
A print from the negative loses some info from the negative.
So scanning a negative, rather than scanning a print from that negative, would retain more of the original information.
Every generation of an image loses something from the previous generation.
The "original" scene is the "real" image. The negative on film does not contain all of the information of the original scene.
A print from the negative loses some info from the negative.
So scanning a negative, rather than scanning a print from that negative, would retain more of the original information.
Excellent and informative presentation.
Jul 10, 2019 22:22:03 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Reading and understanding the technical issues presented by OP's request has been embarrassingly uneven in the responses ...
True.
Jun 29, 2019 21:54:13 #
Graham Thirkill wrote:
Did I read that sign correctly? br br TOILET OUT ... (show quote)
Marvelous collection. A classic essay on why punctuation in the English language matters. I laughed out loud throughout while reading. Thank you for sharing.
Jun 28, 2019 15:52:28 #
What a marvelous and heartwarming story. Thank you for sharing..
Jun 28, 2019 15:24:26 #
We had a family that would visit us every night at home on our deck on Mercer Is, WA. I loved to watch them.
Jun 24, 2019 00:09:59 #
Bill_de wrote:
It is amazing how many people at UHH are 100% self taught and never have to concern themselves with the opinions of others. I would guess these folks never need to read a review, since they are mostly the opinions of others who may or may not be knowledgeable.
But John Donne said:
”No man is an island, entire of itself ..."
---
But John Donne said:
”No man is an island, entire of itself ..."
---
I am a self taught photographer starting with 35mm film as a teenager in the mid 50's. I recognize I still have much to learn. The complexity of all the many aspects of photography is an important part of its fascination for me. You are absolutely correct about the value of a community for learning. That is why I participate in this web site. It is how this "challenge" was posed rather than the OP seeking information and insights on the best lens choices that bothered me. I very seldom have a negative comment about a posting. Maybe its just been a long day.
Jun 23, 2019 21:59:13 #
I'm sorry, but I find this query somewhat arrogant, irrelevant, and irritating.
Jun 22, 2019 23:57:00 #
I have loved Puffins and been fascinated by Puffins since childhood, but have never been able to capture pictures of them that are as good as yours. They are marvelous; catch light or no. Keep up the good work. Thank you for sharing.
Jun 22, 2019 01:55:50 #
I can't get excited about bringing a pound or three weight or more difference in camera equipment on a cruise. I am a frequent cruiser. You come on board, unpack once, and move into your stateroom. Camera and lens selections are dependent on what you intend to photograph in the next port. No reason to lug everything you own, but don't unnecessarily short yourself on a particular shore excursion. You will probably regret the decision. Have a great trip and enjoy the magnificent photographic opportunities in the Baltics.
Jun 12, 2019 01:45:03 #
X Rite i1 Display Pro. Very satisfied. Used w/ Samsung 40"4K monitor (sorry don't remember the model # and its too late to look it up.)
Jun 12, 2019 01:35:30 #
junglejim1949 wrote:
We are planning a trip to Maui and will be renting a condo. I will be taking photo equip and want to know about UGHH recommendations.
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks,
Jim
We have a Personal Articles rider on our USAA Homeowners policy. It originally covered my wife's jewelry, sterling silver, Persian rugs, etc. Regular homeowner policies had insufficient coverage limits. In the last year, I added my camera's and lenses. Inexpensive peace of mind.
Jun 10, 2019 21:29:45 #
bleirer wrote:
I watched the first few episodes of this after you recommended it. Really worthwhile. I've got it cued up to watch the rest. He shows the math, which is cool but not intimidating, and the information on perspective in the first episode was something I hadn't considered.
I have done the same. I have finished 8 sessions. I appreciate the rigor the math gives to these concepts.
Jun 9, 2019 14:16:27 #
larryepage wrote:
Good morning! Sorry to be getting into your discu... (show quote)
Thank you for adding another superb and insightful commentary to this string.