Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: maren
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 next>>
Jan 8, 2023 14:40:21   #
daldds wrote:
Look at "WeTransfer." It allows both free (fewer) and member (huge) benefits.


I will check it out, thanks.
Go to
Jan 8, 2023 14:37:52   #
niteman3d wrote:
I second the cloud storage. Flickr offers space for a thousand free photos of any size (all Flickr members can see them, but you do have an option for 50 free non-public shots.) There are several other similar free services as well, so you have a choice or try them all to see which you like the best.


I am old school, just trying to figure out the cloud storage, so thanks.
Go to
Jan 8, 2023 14:35:25   #
R.G. wrote:
If you have a photo editor with an Export function you should be able to specify the file size or find some way to reduce it. Many editors have an "Export to Internet" option which automatically resizes images.

"Export" is typically found in the FILE dropdown menu at the top of the workspace.


I will check that out. Thanks
Go to
Jan 8, 2023 14:33:55   #
maren wrote:
My photos are too large to e-mail. Is there is a safe and easy way to compress the ones I want to send?


Thank you, I will check that out.
Go to
Jan 8, 2023 02:35:20   #
My photos are too large to e-mail. Is there is a safe and easy way to compress the ones I want to send?
Go to
Jun 6, 2021 00:21:25   #
Ctrclckws wrote:
Make sure the camera is set to record raw+jpg. I think it is the image quality setting.

https://camerajabber.com/how-to-set-up-the-nikon-d850/%23:~:text%3DSet%2520the%2520Image%2520Quality" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://camerajabber.com/how-to-set-up-the-nikon-d850/%23:~:text%3DSet%2520the%2520Image%2520Quality,Lossless%2520compressed%2520and%252014%252Dbit.&ved=2ahUKEwj93YGVlPbwAhUIHM0KHUS3ArsQFjACegQIBBAF&usg=AOvVaw1_hKn9At4sTmav_N_8wlAw


Neither one of those links would come up. Both links said it was an error.
Go to
Jun 1, 2021 02:14:01   #
I have had a Nikon D 850 since the beginning of the year. I thought I had set my SD card for jpeg's and my XQD card just for Raw. Looking through my XQD card the other day, It looks like they are jpeg's as well. I have read and re-read setting up the card slots for the desired types of information saved to each card type. A salesman just told me that there was no way to set up the D 850 in such a way so the jpegs are saved to the SD card and the raw files are saved to the XQD. Is this really correct.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 16:18:13   #
no12mo wrote:
FYI: Anytime a question like is asked of UHH, the OP should post his image with best resolution , without any PP. Leave the EXIF info intact or post it along with the picture. Otherwises, we are going to be throwing ideas against the metaphorical wall to see what sticks. OP: you camera should take the cell phone to the cleaners if your settings / lens is optimal.

Alan


Hey Alan, I didn't have any specific photo in mind, only concepts that I needed to understand. Have gotten lots of info, and many good websites. I will know way more than I did before I asked the question. Some info in understandable, some confuses me, but all in all I appreciate it all. I also like when the pro's questionable each other. It is all a learning tool for me, and thankful for UHHer's answering questions they may get tired of answering. Thanks to all
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 16:09:35   #
frankraney wrote:
That is not right either. They can not send you a photo at 72dpi. DPI is printer resolution, not photo res. Photo res is ppi. A Photo 6000x4000 is 24,000,000/24 meg. you can print the photo at 1 dpi or 300 dpi and the res of 3000x4000 does not change. What changes is the printed image res. It will look different printed at different DPI and viewing at different distances.

As I said, go back up and read Gene's post. I believe this is the site he listed. If not thisa is good reading.

http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/printing/resolution/1_which_resolution_print_size_viewing_distance.htm
That is not right either. They can not send you a ... (show quote)


Got it. thanks.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 16:04:47   #
coolhanduke wrote:
Yes, that is a valid point.

Since my Epson only printed 24" wide, I always just had my customers send me the photo cropped to the size they wanted at 300 dpi and never had any issues. When I did, it was because they cropped the photo and didn't check the dpi and it was something less, like 72.


Sound like the 300 dpi is used a lot. Thanks
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 16:00:37   #
RWebb76 wrote:
Gene's exactly right. It is a combination of resolution, size and viewing distance. There are entire billboards that have photos taken with an iPhone. That is misleading because one views billboards from a longer distance away and cannot see the pixelization. It is no different than looking at mosaics in churches in Europe. They look like fine paintings at a distance, but up close one can easily see the smaller bits of tile. The same is true with photos. Or go up at 2 inches and look at your tv.

This is kinda why some of the super high resolution cameras really are an overkill for many people.
Gene's exactly right. It is a combination of reso... (show quote)


THank you. Feeling very encouraged by all. Thanks for your time.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 15:58:20   #
Uuglypher wrote:
The answer is found in Gene51’s response and posted link.
“ its all about viewing distance and human visual acuity” says it all!

Dave


Have heard that from several UHHer's. Will study that thoroughly.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 15:55:37   #
jamesl wrote:
----------------
I would use a program like "ON1 Resize" to enlarge the photo you want to print larger. With it you can get larger prints that retain good detail.


I am anxious to check that out. Thanks.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 15:53:45   #
via the lens wrote:
Your D500 images will, given that you take sharp well-done images, be able to be enlarged beyond the 1:1 ratio of the camera. You can do this in a number of software programs, including LrC and PS if you have the Adobe plan. If you go to an outside printer, like Bay Photo, they can assist you with specific information. Normally, with an outside printer, you would simply load the largest file you have. In actuality, often it does not take a really large file to create a quality print in larger sizes, depending on the image quality and the print size.
Your D500 images will, given that you take sharp w... (show quote)


Thank you. I am encouraged.
Go to
Feb 8, 2021 15:49:20   #
imagemeister wrote:
While not adding high fidelity "detail", I would venture to say that for most people, interpolated pixels, micro-contrast and questionably perceived "artifacts" are more attractive and acceptable than ragged pixelation - maybe the lesser of two evils ? - but I could be wrong - just sayin'
.

Thanks imagemeister. I am pondering that, and will probably make more sense to me after I digest everyone's information.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.